RCA指标的时间平稳性、形状和顺序排序偏差:一套新的度量方法

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of World Economics Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.1007/s10290-023-00512-6
Rémi Stellian, Jair N. Ojeda-Joya, Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago
{"title":"RCA指标的时间平稳性、形状和顺序排序偏差:一套新的度量方法","authors":"Rémi Stellian, Jair N. Ojeda-Joya, Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago","doi":"10.1007/s10290-023-00512-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A new set of tools to measure the time stationarity, shape and ordinal ranking bias of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) indexes is suggested. The aim is to help select the most consistent RCA index for a given set of countries, products and time periods, which is especially relevant for economic policy based on comparative advantages. The GMM estimation of an AR(1) process based on RCA indexes provides three measures of time stationarity that are more rational than the measures available in the literature. Furthermore, we revise the statistics that are commonly used to capture shape. Finally, with respect to ordinal ranking bias, we modify the use of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient in Leromain and Orefice (Int Econ 139:48–70, 2014) and generalize the non-parametric measure of Stellian and Danna-Buitrago (J Appl Econ 22(1):349–379, 2019). We discuss different methods of ranking RCA indexes according to all proposed measures. An application to 33 RCA indexes, 67 trade areas and three product classifications shows that, on average, the most accurate RCA indexes are Contribution-to-the-Trade-Balance indexes, Revealed Competitiveness indexes and regression-based indexes.","PeriodicalId":47405,"journal":{"name":"Review of World Economics","volume":"22 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time stationarity, shape and ordinal ranking bias of RCA indexes: a new set of measures\",\"authors\":\"Rémi Stellian, Jair N. Ojeda-Joya, Jenny P. Danna-Buitrago\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10290-023-00512-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A new set of tools to measure the time stationarity, shape and ordinal ranking bias of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) indexes is suggested. The aim is to help select the most consistent RCA index for a given set of countries, products and time periods, which is especially relevant for economic policy based on comparative advantages. The GMM estimation of an AR(1) process based on RCA indexes provides three measures of time stationarity that are more rational than the measures available in the literature. Furthermore, we revise the statistics that are commonly used to capture shape. Finally, with respect to ordinal ranking bias, we modify the use of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient in Leromain and Orefice (Int Econ 139:48–70, 2014) and generalize the non-parametric measure of Stellian and Danna-Buitrago (J Appl Econ 22(1):349–379, 2019). We discuss different methods of ranking RCA indexes according to all proposed measures. An application to 33 RCA indexes, 67 trade areas and three product classifications shows that, on average, the most accurate RCA indexes are Contribution-to-the-Trade-Balance indexes, Revealed Competitiveness indexes and regression-based indexes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of World Economics\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of World Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-023-00512-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of World Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-023-00512-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要提出了一套新的工具来衡量显示性比较优势(RCA)指数的时间平稳性、形状和顺序排序偏差。其目的是帮助为一组给定的国家、产品和时期选择最一致的区域消费偏好指数,这与基于比较优势的经济政策特别有关。基于RCA指标的AR(1)过程的GMM估计提供了三种比文献中可用的度量更合理的时间平稳性度量。此外,我们修改了通常用于捕获形状的统计数据。最后,对于有序排序偏差,我们修改了Leromain和Orefice (Int Econ 139:48-70, 2014)中Spearman等级相关系数的使用,并推广了Stellian和Danna-Buitrago (J应用经济学22(1):349-379,2019)的非参数度量。根据所提出的各项指标,讨论了不同的RCA指标排序方法。对33个RCA指数、67个贸易领域和3种产品分类的应用表明,平均而言,最准确的RCA指数是贸易平衡贡献指数、显示竞争力指数和基于回归的指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time stationarity, shape and ordinal ranking bias of RCA indexes: a new set of measures
Abstract A new set of tools to measure the time stationarity, shape and ordinal ranking bias of Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) indexes is suggested. The aim is to help select the most consistent RCA index for a given set of countries, products and time periods, which is especially relevant for economic policy based on comparative advantages. The GMM estimation of an AR(1) process based on RCA indexes provides three measures of time stationarity that are more rational than the measures available in the literature. Furthermore, we revise the statistics that are commonly used to capture shape. Finally, with respect to ordinal ranking bias, we modify the use of Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient in Leromain and Orefice (Int Econ 139:48–70, 2014) and generalize the non-parametric measure of Stellian and Danna-Buitrago (J Appl Econ 22(1):349–379, 2019). We discuss different methods of ranking RCA indexes according to all proposed measures. An application to 33 RCA indexes, 67 trade areas and three product classifications shows that, on average, the most accurate RCA indexes are Contribution-to-the-Trade-Balance indexes, Revealed Competitiveness indexes and regression-based indexes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Review of World Economics is a quarterly journal. Under the name Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, it was founded in 1913 as the world''s first journal with a focus on international economics. The Review has retained this focus, with particular emphasis on research in trade and trade policies, foreign direct investment, global supply chains, migration, international finance, currency systems and exchange rates, monetary and fiscal policies in open economies. The objective of the Review is to publish contributions of the highest quality and retain its status as one of the leading journals in international economics. Officially cited as: Rev World Econ
期刊最新文献
Gravity and trade in video on demand services Patterns of global and regional integration in the East African Community The evolution of manufacturing comparative advantage along global value chains: the amplifying role of logistics performance Trade, productivity, and services input intensity Do investors reward sovereign catastrophe bond issuance? Evidence from a panel of 26 disaster-prone countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1