{"title":"领导-成员交换(LMX)与工作绩效:自我决定理论在工作情境中的应用","authors":"Alexandra A. Henderson, Sophia S. Jeong","doi":"10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTUsing self-determination theory (SDT) as a guiding framework, we examined the effects of leader–member exchange (LMX) on performance through psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation. Lagged data was collected from 333 dental hygienists across four time points. We examined three forms of performance: task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), and counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). LMX was positively related to all three forms of psychological need satisfaction (competence, relatedness, autonomy), autonomy need satisfaction was positively related to intrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation was negatively related to CWB. Overall, there were significant indirect effects from LMX to all forms of performance; however, the mediating mechanisms varied. LMX was indirectly linked to task performance through competence need satisfaction and autonomy need satisfaction, to OCB through competence need satisfaction, and to CWB through the sequential effects of autonomy need satisfaction on intrinsic motivation. Our results highlight the complexity of the LMX-performance relationship and show that SDT can help to explain the relationship, depending on the type of performance being assessed.KEYWORDS: Leader–member exchangeperformanceorganizational citizenship behaviourcounterproductive work behaviourself-determination theory Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2276535Notes1. We used a Harman one-factor test (Podsakoff & Organ, Citation1986) and an instrumental variable approach (Saridakis et al., Citation2020) to assess common method variance and endogeneity, respectively. Results from these analyses indicated that these were not significant issues in our model.Additional informationFundingThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.This study was approved by the Bowling Green State University Institutional Review Board (Project #1073732).","PeriodicalId":48240,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","volume":" 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leader–member exchange (LMX) and work performance: an application of self-determination theory in the work context\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra A. Henderson, Sophia S. Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTUsing self-determination theory (SDT) as a guiding framework, we examined the effects of leader–member exchange (LMX) on performance through psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation. Lagged data was collected from 333 dental hygienists across four time points. We examined three forms of performance: task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), and counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). LMX was positively related to all three forms of psychological need satisfaction (competence, relatedness, autonomy), autonomy need satisfaction was positively related to intrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation was negatively related to CWB. Overall, there were significant indirect effects from LMX to all forms of performance; however, the mediating mechanisms varied. LMX was indirectly linked to task performance through competence need satisfaction and autonomy need satisfaction, to OCB through competence need satisfaction, and to CWB through the sequential effects of autonomy need satisfaction on intrinsic motivation. Our results highlight the complexity of the LMX-performance relationship and show that SDT can help to explain the relationship, depending on the type of performance being assessed.KEYWORDS: Leader–member exchangeperformanceorganizational citizenship behaviourcounterproductive work behaviourself-determination theory Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2276535Notes1. We used a Harman one-factor test (Podsakoff & Organ, Citation1986) and an instrumental variable approach (Saridakis et al., Citation2020) to assess common method variance and endogeneity, respectively. Results from these analyses indicated that these were not significant issues in our model.Additional informationFundingThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.This study was approved by the Bowling Green State University Institutional Review Board (Project #1073732).\",\"PeriodicalId\":48240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\" 16\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276535\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276535","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本文以自我决定理论为指导框架,从心理需求满足和内在动机两方面考察了领导-成员交换对绩效的影响。滞后数据是在四个时间点从333名牙科保健师那里收集的。我们研究了三种绩效形式:任务绩效、组织公民行为(OCB)和反生产行为(CWB)。LMX与胜任力、亲缘性、自主性三种心理需求满足均呈正相关,自主性需求满足与内在动机正相关,内在动机与CWB负相关。总体而言,LMX对所有形式的绩效都有显著的间接影响;然而,调解机制各不相同。LMX通过能力需求满足和自主需求满足与任务绩效间接相关,通过能力需求满足与组织行为间接相关,通过自主需求满足对内在动机的序贯效应与CWB间接相关。我们的研究结果突出了lmx -绩效关系的复杂性,并表明SDT可以帮助解释这种关系,这取决于所评估的绩效类型。关键词:领导-成员交换绩效组织公民行为反生产行为自我决定理论披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本文的补充数据可以在线访问https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2276535Notes1。我们分别使用Harman单因素检验(Podsakoff & Organ, Citation1986)和工具变量方法(Saridakis et al., Citation2020)来评估常见方法的方差和内质性。这些分析的结果表明,这些问题在我们的模型中并不重要。支持本研究结果的数据可在合理要求下从通讯作者处获得。这项研究由鲍灵格林州立大学机构审查委员会批准(项目#1073732)。
Leader–member exchange (LMX) and work performance: an application of self-determination theory in the work context
ABSTRACTUsing self-determination theory (SDT) as a guiding framework, we examined the effects of leader–member exchange (LMX) on performance through psychological need satisfaction and intrinsic motivation. Lagged data was collected from 333 dental hygienists across four time points. We examined three forms of performance: task performance, organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), and counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). LMX was positively related to all three forms of psychological need satisfaction (competence, relatedness, autonomy), autonomy need satisfaction was positively related to intrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation was negatively related to CWB. Overall, there were significant indirect effects from LMX to all forms of performance; however, the mediating mechanisms varied. LMX was indirectly linked to task performance through competence need satisfaction and autonomy need satisfaction, to OCB through competence need satisfaction, and to CWB through the sequential effects of autonomy need satisfaction on intrinsic motivation. Our results highlight the complexity of the LMX-performance relationship and show that SDT can help to explain the relationship, depending on the type of performance being assessed.KEYWORDS: Leader–member exchangeperformanceorganizational citizenship behaviourcounterproductive work behaviourself-determination theory Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Supplementary dataSupplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2276535Notes1. We used a Harman one-factor test (Podsakoff & Organ, Citation1986) and an instrumental variable approach (Saridakis et al., Citation2020) to assess common method variance and endogeneity, respectively. Results from these analyses indicated that these were not significant issues in our model.Additional informationFundingThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.This study was approved by the Bowling Green State University Institutional Review Board (Project #1073732).
期刊介绍:
The mission of the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology is to promote and support the development of Work and Organizational Psychology by publishing high-quality scientific articles that improve our understanding of phenomena occurring in work and organizational settings. The journal publishes empirical, theoretical, methodological, and review articles that are relevant to real-world situations. The journal has a world-wide authorship, readership and editorial board. Submissions from all around the world are invited.