功能性平衡能力测量:衡量脑卒中后患者整个功能活动范围内平衡能力的方法

Jasmine J. Cash MS , Craig A. Velozo PhD, OTR/L , Mark G. Bowden PT, PhD , Bryant A. Seamon PT, DPT, PhD
{"title":"功能性平衡能力测量:衡量脑卒中后患者整个功能活动范围内平衡能力的方法","authors":"Jasmine J. Cash MS ,&nbsp;Craig A. Velozo PhD, OTR/L ,&nbsp;Mark G. Bowden PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Bryant A. Seamon PT, DPT, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether the measurement properties of an instrument that combines items from the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) called the <em>Functional Balance Ability Measure (FBAM)</em> supports measuring balance across the functional mobility spectrum<em>.</em></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Item-level data were from an archival research database.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Ambulatory individuals (N=93, BBS=50 [29-56], FGA=16 [0-30], Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremities=27 [14-34], self-selected walking speed=0.4±0.2 m/s, mean age ± SD, 61.7±11.3y; 30.1% female) with chronic stroke (≥6 months).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Unidimensionality was evaluated with a principal components analysis (PCA) of residuals. FBAM rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation were investigated using the Andrich Rating Scale Model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PCA findings indicate the FBAM is sufficiently unidimensional. Rating scale structure was appropriate without modifying the original BBS and FGA scoring systems. Item hierarchy aligned with clinical and theoretical predictions (hardest item: FGA-gait with narrow base of support, easiest item: BBS-sitting unsupported). One item (BBS-standing on 1 foot) misfit, however, removal marginally affected person measures and model statistics. The FBAM demonstrated high person reliability (0.9) and 6 people (∼6%) misfit the expected response pattern. The FBAM separated participants into 4 statistically distinct strata, without a floor or ceiling effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The FBAM is a unidimensional measure for balance ability across a continuum of functional tasks. Rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation support the FBAM's measurement properties in persons with chronic stroke. Future work should investigate measurement with fewer items and whether the FBAM addresses barriers to adoption of standardized balance measures in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000587/pdfft?md5=449e9ebb1ab368c0936ce40389fc7227&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000587-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Functional Balance Ability Measure: A Measure of Balance Across the Spectrum of Functional Mobility in Persons Post-Stroke\",\"authors\":\"Jasmine J. Cash MS ,&nbsp;Craig A. Velozo PhD, OTR/L ,&nbsp;Mark G. Bowden PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Bryant A. Seamon PT, DPT, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine whether the measurement properties of an instrument that combines items from the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) called the <em>Functional Balance Ability Measure (FBAM)</em> supports measuring balance across the functional mobility spectrum<em>.</em></p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Item-level data were from an archival research database.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Ambulatory individuals (N=93, BBS=50 [29-56], FGA=16 [0-30], Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremities=27 [14-34], self-selected walking speed=0.4±0.2 m/s, mean age ± SD, 61.7±11.3y; 30.1% female) with chronic stroke (≥6 months).</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Not applicable.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Unidimensionality was evaluated with a principal components analysis (PCA) of residuals. FBAM rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation were investigated using the Andrich Rating Scale Model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PCA findings indicate the FBAM is sufficiently unidimensional. Rating scale structure was appropriate without modifying the original BBS and FGA scoring systems. Item hierarchy aligned with clinical and theoretical predictions (hardest item: FGA-gait with narrow base of support, easiest item: BBS-sitting unsupported). One item (BBS-standing on 1 foot) misfit, however, removal marginally affected person measures and model statistics. The FBAM demonstrated high person reliability (0.9) and 6 people (∼6%) misfit the expected response pattern. The FBAM separated participants into 4 statistically distinct strata, without a floor or ceiling effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The FBAM is a unidimensional measure for balance ability across a continuum of functional tasks. Rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation support the FBAM's measurement properties in persons with chronic stroke. Future work should investigate measurement with fewer items and whether the FBAM addresses barriers to adoption of standardized balance measures in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000587/pdfft?md5=449e9ebb1ab368c0936ce40389fc7227&pid=1-s2.0-S2590109523000587-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109523000587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 确定一种结合了伯格平衡量表(BBS)和功能步态评估(FGA)项目的测量工具--功能平衡能力测量(FBAM)的测量特性是否支持测量整个功能移动范围内的平衡能力。参与者慢性中风(≥6 个月)患者(93 人,BBS=50 [29-56],FGA=16 [0-30],Fugl-Meyer 下肢评估=27 [14-34],自选步行速度=0.4±0.2 m/s,平均年龄(± SD),61.7±11.3 岁;女性占 30.1%).干预措施不适用.主要结果测量残差的主成分分析(PCA)评估了多维性。使用 Andrich 评定量表模型研究了 FBAM 评定量表的特征、项目层次、项目与人的匹配度以及人与人的分离。评分量表结构适当,无需修改原始的 BBS 和 FGA 评分系统。项目层次结构符合临床和理论预测(最难的项目:FGA-步态支撑基础狭窄,最简单的项目:BBS-无支撑坐姿)。然而,有一个项目(BBS-单脚站立)不符合要求,去除后对个人测量和模型统计略有影响。FBAM 显示出较高的人际可靠性(0.9),6 人(6%)与预期的反应模式不符。FBAM将参与者分为4个不同的统计分层,没有下限或上限效应。评分量表特征、项目层次结构、项目与人的契合度以及人与人的分离度都支持 FBAM 对慢性中风患者的测量特性。未来的工作应研究用更少的项目进行测量,以及 FBAM 是否能解决临床实践中采用标准化平衡测量的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Functional Balance Ability Measure: A Measure of Balance Across the Spectrum of Functional Mobility in Persons Post-Stroke

Objective

To determine whether the measurement properties of an instrument that combines items from the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) called the Functional Balance Ability Measure (FBAM) supports measuring balance across the functional mobility spectrum.

Design

Retrospective cohort.

Setting

Item-level data were from an archival research database.

Participants

Ambulatory individuals (N=93, BBS=50 [29-56], FGA=16 [0-30], Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremities=27 [14-34], self-selected walking speed=0.4±0.2 m/s, mean age ± SD, 61.7±11.3y; 30.1% female) with chronic stroke (≥6 months).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Unidimensionality was evaluated with a principal components analysis (PCA) of residuals. FBAM rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation were investigated using the Andrich Rating Scale Model.

Results

PCA findings indicate the FBAM is sufficiently unidimensional. Rating scale structure was appropriate without modifying the original BBS and FGA scoring systems. Item hierarchy aligned with clinical and theoretical predictions (hardest item: FGA-gait with narrow base of support, easiest item: BBS-sitting unsupported). One item (BBS-standing on 1 foot) misfit, however, removal marginally affected person measures and model statistics. The FBAM demonstrated high person reliability (0.9) and 6 people (∼6%) misfit the expected response pattern. The FBAM separated participants into 4 statistically distinct strata, without a floor or ceiling effect.

Conclusions

The FBAM is a unidimensional measure for balance ability across a continuum of functional tasks. Rating-scale characteristics, item hierarchy, item and person fit, and person separation support the FBAM's measurement properties in persons with chronic stroke. Future work should investigate measurement with fewer items and whether the FBAM addresses barriers to adoption of standardized balance measures in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies Effects of Pilates on Body Posture: A Systematic Review Randomized Trial to Evaluate Effects of Peer- and Clinician-Led Interventions for Caregivers of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury Creation of a Limb Loss and Preservation Registry for Improving the Quality of Patient Care in the United States Comparison of Diagnosis-Related Group Rehabilitation Reimbursement Payments With Those of a Novel Patient Classification-Based Payment System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1