高等教育中的流行病教学法:用体验式学习探索理论

Lacee R. Boschetto
{"title":"高等教育中的流行病教学法:用体验式学习探索理论","authors":"Lacee R. Boschetto","doi":"10.14307/jfcs115.3.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"March 2020 will be etched in time as a significant pivot in the landscape of education. For many educators, transitioning to remote learning initiated a survival mode in which previously unutilized strategies were implemented to salvage curriculum. The lack of in-person interaction halted traditional instruction methods, altering opportunities to incorporate sufficient rigor. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning in higher education increased in popularity, despite perceptions of inconsistent online design and implementation (Meyer, 2002). The sudden shift to a remote learning environment sparked a return of student concern toward online learning. Shortly after the spring 2020 semester, 72.5% of students reported the online format required “more effort to complete my coursework” (Motz et al., 2021). The lack of proper training in online instruction often resulted in educators—unfamiliar with online tools designed for student engagement—who associated rigor with a robust amount of coursework (Tobin, 2020). As observed in the Motz et al. (2020) study, the intent to supplement in-person lectures with additional resources did not lead to learning. Recent research indicated that increased coursework with more time spent on assignments resulted in lower grades and decreased students' perceived success (Motz et al., 2021).","PeriodicalId":91905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of family and consumer sciences","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic Pedagogy in Higher Education: Exploring Theories With Experiential Learning\",\"authors\":\"Lacee R. Boschetto\",\"doi\":\"10.14307/jfcs115.3.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"March 2020 will be etched in time as a significant pivot in the landscape of education. For many educators, transitioning to remote learning initiated a survival mode in which previously unutilized strategies were implemented to salvage curriculum. The lack of in-person interaction halted traditional instruction methods, altering opportunities to incorporate sufficient rigor. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning in higher education increased in popularity, despite perceptions of inconsistent online design and implementation (Meyer, 2002). The sudden shift to a remote learning environment sparked a return of student concern toward online learning. Shortly after the spring 2020 semester, 72.5% of students reported the online format required “more effort to complete my coursework” (Motz et al., 2021). The lack of proper training in online instruction often resulted in educators—unfamiliar with online tools designed for student engagement—who associated rigor with a robust amount of coursework (Tobin, 2020). As observed in the Motz et al. (2020) study, the intent to supplement in-person lectures with additional resources did not lead to learning. Recent research indicated that increased coursework with more time spent on assignments resulted in lower grades and decreased students' perceived success (Motz et al., 2021).\",\"PeriodicalId\":91905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of family and consumer sciences\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of family and consumer sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14307/jfcs115.3.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of family and consumer sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14307/jfcs115.3.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年3月将成为教育版图上的一个重要转折点。对于许多教育工作者来说,向远程学习的过渡开启了一种生存模式,在这种模式中,以前未使用的策略被实施来挽救课程。缺乏面对面的交流使传统的教学方法停滞不前,改变了融入足够严谨的机会。在COVID-19大流行之前,尽管人们认为在线设计和实施不一致,但高等教育中的在线学习越来越受欢迎(Meyer, 2002年)。突然转向远程学习环境引发了学生对在线学习的关注。2020年春季学期结束后不久,72.5%的学生报告说,在线形式需要“更多的努力来完成我的课程”(Motz et al., 2021)。缺乏适当的在线教学培训往往导致教育工作者不熟悉为学生参与而设计的在线工具,他们将严格性与大量的课程作业联系在一起(Tobin, 2020)。正如Motz等人(2020)的研究所观察到的那样,用额外的资源补充现场讲座的意图并没有导致学习。最近的研究表明,增加的课程和更多的时间花在作业上导致较低的成绩和降低学生的感知成功(Motz等人,2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pandemic Pedagogy in Higher Education: Exploring Theories With Experiential Learning
March 2020 will be etched in time as a significant pivot in the landscape of education. For many educators, transitioning to remote learning initiated a survival mode in which previously unutilized strategies were implemented to salvage curriculum. The lack of in-person interaction halted traditional instruction methods, altering opportunities to incorporate sufficient rigor. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, online learning in higher education increased in popularity, despite perceptions of inconsistent online design and implementation (Meyer, 2002). The sudden shift to a remote learning environment sparked a return of student concern toward online learning. Shortly after the spring 2020 semester, 72.5% of students reported the online format required “more effort to complete my coursework” (Motz et al., 2021). The lack of proper training in online instruction often resulted in educators—unfamiliar with online tools designed for student engagement—who associated rigor with a robust amount of coursework (Tobin, 2020). As observed in the Motz et al. (2020) study, the intent to supplement in-person lectures with additional resources did not lead to learning. Recent research indicated that increased coursework with more time spent on assignments resulted in lower grades and decreased students' perceived success (Motz et al., 2021).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Literature Review: Relevance of Communication Anxiety in Early Childhood and Game Media The Father's Parenting Involvement and Adolescent Resilience in Families with Working Spouses in Depok City Building Quality of Human Capital through Pre-Marital School for Teenagers in Ciherang Village The Role of Social and Economic Dimensions of The Family in Preventing and Reducing Stunting in Bekasi District Self-Adjustment and Psychological Well-being of Santri at the Asshiddiqiyah 2 Islamic Boarding School, Tangerang, Banten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1