UV-C光和漂白剂联合使用对重症监护病房表面消毒是否比单独使用漂白剂效果差?

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100307
Nur Shazlin Shek Daud, Mark Dunn, Olga Lucia Moncayo-Nieto, Alasdair Hay
{"title":"UV-C光和漂白剂联合使用对重症监护病房表面消毒是否比单独使用漂白剂效果差?","authors":"Nur Shazlin Shek Daud,&nbsp;Mark Dunn,&nbsp;Olga Lucia Moncayo-Nieto,&nbsp;Alasdair Hay","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chlorine-based disinfectants, such as bleach, are commonly used for cleaning in healthcare settings to prevent the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. To enhance the efficacy of disinfection, ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light systems have been proposed to supplement standard cleaning procedures. As bleach decomposes in UV light, we hypothesised that the use of UV-C light as an adjunct to manual cleaning with bleach, may decrease the efficacy of disinfection instead.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the laboratory, stainless steel sheets and plastic keyboards were inoculated with <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (∼10<sup>6</sup> CFU/ml) and subjected to treatment with either UV-C light only, bleach only or a combination of UV-C light and bleach. The residual bioburden (CFU/ml) was quantified through conventional microbiological techniques. Results were compared to non-exposed control surfaces and against each treatment strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On tested surfaces, there were statistically significant reductions in <em>P. aeruginosa</em> when surfaces were treated with UV-C light only (&gt;2.5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction), bleach only (&gt;5.6 log<sub>10</sub> reduction) and a combination of UV-C light and bleach (&gt;6.3 log<sub>10</sub> reduction) compared to positive control (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, all treatment strategies). No significant differences were observed when surfaces were treated with the addition of UV-C light to bleach compared to treatment with bleach alone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no difference in the efficacy of disinfection against <em>P. aeruginosa</em> with the combined treatment strategy of UV-C light and bleach compared to bleach alone under laboratory conditions. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the effectiveness of this technology on other healthcare-associated pathogens.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"5 4","pages":"Article 100307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000409/pdfft?md5=8b0611e0d8c892d8d41b59870f441dba&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088923000409-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the combination of UV-C light and bleach less effective than bleach alone for intensive care unit surface disinfection?\",\"authors\":\"Nur Shazlin Shek Daud,&nbsp;Mark Dunn,&nbsp;Olga Lucia Moncayo-Nieto,&nbsp;Alasdair Hay\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infpip.2023.100307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Chlorine-based disinfectants, such as bleach, are commonly used for cleaning in healthcare settings to prevent the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. To enhance the efficacy of disinfection, ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light systems have been proposed to supplement standard cleaning procedures. As bleach decomposes in UV light, we hypothesised that the use of UV-C light as an adjunct to manual cleaning with bleach, may decrease the efficacy of disinfection instead.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the laboratory, stainless steel sheets and plastic keyboards were inoculated with <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> (∼10<sup>6</sup> CFU/ml) and subjected to treatment with either UV-C light only, bleach only or a combination of UV-C light and bleach. The residual bioburden (CFU/ml) was quantified through conventional microbiological techniques. Results were compared to non-exposed control surfaces and against each treatment strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On tested surfaces, there were statistically significant reductions in <em>P. aeruginosa</em> when surfaces were treated with UV-C light only (&gt;2.5 log<sub>10</sub> reduction), bleach only (&gt;5.6 log<sub>10</sub> reduction) and a combination of UV-C light and bleach (&gt;6.3 log<sub>10</sub> reduction) compared to positive control (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001, all treatment strategies). No significant differences were observed when surfaces were treated with the addition of UV-C light to bleach compared to treatment with bleach alone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no difference in the efficacy of disinfection against <em>P. aeruginosa</em> with the combined treatment strategy of UV-C light and bleach compared to bleach alone under laboratory conditions. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the effectiveness of this technology on other healthcare-associated pathogens.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000409/pdfft?md5=8b0611e0d8c892d8d41b59870f441dba&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088923000409-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Prevention in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088923000409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景氯基消毒剂,如漂白剂,通常用于卫生保健机构的清洁,以防止院内病原体的传播。为了提高消毒效果,建议使用紫外线- c (UV-C)光系统来补充标准的清洁程序。由于漂白剂在紫外线下分解,我们假设使用UV- c光辅助使用漂白剂进行人工清洁可能会降低消毒效果。方法在实验室中,用铜绿假单胞菌(~ 106 CFU/ml)接种不锈钢片和塑料键盘,分别用UV-C光、漂白剂或UV-C光和漂白剂联合处理。剩余生物负荷(CFU/ml)通过常规微生物学技术进行定量。结果与未暴露的对照面和每种处理策略进行了比较。结果在测试表面上,与阳性对照(P < P < P)相比,单独用UV-C光(减少>2.5 log10)、单独用漂白剂(减少>5.6 log10)和UV-C光与漂白剂联合(减少>6.3 log10)处理表面的铜绿假单胞菌数量有统计学意义上的显著减少。0.001,所有治疗策略)。在漂白剂中加入UV-C光与单独使用漂白剂相比,表面处理没有显著差异。结论在实验室条件下,UV-C光与漂白剂联合处理对铜绿假单胞菌的消毒效果与单独使用漂白剂无显著差异。进一步的研究需要阐明该技术对其他卫生保健相关病原体的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the combination of UV-C light and bleach less effective than bleach alone for intensive care unit surface disinfection?

Background

Chlorine-based disinfectants, such as bleach, are commonly used for cleaning in healthcare settings to prevent the transmission of nosocomial pathogens. To enhance the efficacy of disinfection, ultraviolet-C (UV-C) light systems have been proposed to supplement standard cleaning procedures. As bleach decomposes in UV light, we hypothesised that the use of UV-C light as an adjunct to manual cleaning with bleach, may decrease the efficacy of disinfection instead.

Methods

In the laboratory, stainless steel sheets and plastic keyboards were inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (∼106 CFU/ml) and subjected to treatment with either UV-C light only, bleach only or a combination of UV-C light and bleach. The residual bioburden (CFU/ml) was quantified through conventional microbiological techniques. Results were compared to non-exposed control surfaces and against each treatment strategy.

Results

On tested surfaces, there were statistically significant reductions in P. aeruginosa when surfaces were treated with UV-C light only (>2.5 log10 reduction), bleach only (>5.6 log10 reduction) and a combination of UV-C light and bleach (>6.3 log10 reduction) compared to positive control (P < 0.001, all treatment strategies). No significant differences were observed when surfaces were treated with the addition of UV-C light to bleach compared to treatment with bleach alone.

Conclusion

There was no difference in the efficacy of disinfection against P. aeruginosa with the combined treatment strategy of UV-C light and bleach compared to bleach alone under laboratory conditions. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the effectiveness of this technology on other healthcare-associated pathogens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in paediatric patients: a multivariate analysis Feasibility of hand disinfection in paediatric advanced life support (PALS): A simulation study Reassessing the need for scheduled replacement of short term central venous catheters: A narrative comprehensive review Rapid implementation of a clinical decision-support workflow during the national blood culture bottle shortage Low prevalence of borderline oxacillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a tertiary care hospital in South Carolina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1