在阿拉巴马河上,白鲟曾经通过一个船闸和水坝结构的运动

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Transactions of The American Fisheries Society Pub Date : 2023-09-16 DOI:10.1002/tafs.10447
Byron D. Thomas, Dennis R. DeVries, Russell A. Wright, Matthew J. Catalano
{"title":"在阿拉巴马河上,白鲟曾经通过一个船闸和水坝结构的运动","authors":"Byron D. Thomas, Dennis R. DeVries, Russell A. Wright, Matthew J. Catalano","doi":"10.1002/tafs.10447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Movement of fish past dams can be facilitated by dedicated fish passage structures, navigational locks, and crested spillways, with the efficacy of a passage structure depending strongly on the nature of the systems (height of the dam, flow rate, etc.) and the fish's behavior and swimming capability. However, once past a dam whether by the use of a mitigation structure or due to active translocation, fish encounter a different habitat upstream versus in the tailrace, potentially affecting their ability to continue their upstream migration. Here we had two objectives: First, we determined whether Paddlefish Polyodon spathula that successfully passed a structure continued on their upstream migration. Because assuring passage by tagged fish required that we move fish past the dam, our second objective was to determine whether translocated fish exhibited fallback behavior (downstream drift or movement post‐release that would compromise their continued migration). We used both active and passive telemetry to quantify post‐passage movements of tagged and translocated Paddlefish. Fish translocated above Claiborne Lock and Dam (CLD) exhibited up‐river movements once translocated and exhibited no fallback (i.e., downstream movement with delayed or no continuation upstream). Timing of movement relative to spawning periods did not influence initial fish movement or the likelihood of reaching the next upstream dam (Millers Ferry Lock and Dam; MFLD, approx. 100 river km upstream) within the first 30‐days of observation, but more fish tagged and released during the early pre‐spawning period made it within 4.83 km of MFLD (the location of our closest receiver below MFLD) than did fish from pre‐spawning or spawning periods. Fish released above CLD had a lower probability of being subsequently detected downstream of their release sites compared to fish released below CLD. Our findings support that Paddlefish will continue their upstream migration once past a structure despite changes in habitat.","PeriodicalId":23214,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Movement of Paddlefish Once Past a <scp>Lock‐and‐Dam</scp> Structure on the Alabama River\",\"authors\":\"Byron D. Thomas, Dennis R. DeVries, Russell A. Wright, Matthew J. Catalano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tafs.10447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Movement of fish past dams can be facilitated by dedicated fish passage structures, navigational locks, and crested spillways, with the efficacy of a passage structure depending strongly on the nature of the systems (height of the dam, flow rate, etc.) and the fish's behavior and swimming capability. However, once past a dam whether by the use of a mitigation structure or due to active translocation, fish encounter a different habitat upstream versus in the tailrace, potentially affecting their ability to continue their upstream migration. Here we had two objectives: First, we determined whether Paddlefish Polyodon spathula that successfully passed a structure continued on their upstream migration. Because assuring passage by tagged fish required that we move fish past the dam, our second objective was to determine whether translocated fish exhibited fallback behavior (downstream drift or movement post‐release that would compromise their continued migration). We used both active and passive telemetry to quantify post‐passage movements of tagged and translocated Paddlefish. Fish translocated above Claiborne Lock and Dam (CLD) exhibited up‐river movements once translocated and exhibited no fallback (i.e., downstream movement with delayed or no continuation upstream). Timing of movement relative to spawning periods did not influence initial fish movement or the likelihood of reaching the next upstream dam (Millers Ferry Lock and Dam; MFLD, approx. 100 river km upstream) within the first 30‐days of observation, but more fish tagged and released during the early pre‐spawning period made it within 4.83 km of MFLD (the location of our closest receiver below MFLD) than did fish from pre‐spawning or spawning periods. Fish released above CLD had a lower probability of being subsequently detected downstream of their release sites compared to fish released below CLD. Our findings support that Paddlefish will continue their upstream migration once past a structure despite changes in habitat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The American Fisheries Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tafs.10447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

专门的鱼类通道结构、导航船闸和顶部溢洪道可以促进鱼类通过水坝的运动,通道结构的效果在很大程度上取决于系统的性质(水坝的高度、流量等)以及鱼类的行为和游泳能力。然而,一旦越过大坝,无论是由于使用缓解结构还是由于主动迁移,鱼类在上游遇到的栖息地与在尾流中遇到的栖息地不同,这可能会影响它们继续向上游迁移的能力。在这里,我们有两个目标:首先,我们确定成功通过结构的白鲟是否继续向上游迁移。因为确保被标记的鱼通过需要我们将鱼移过水坝,我们的第二个目标是确定被转移的鱼是否表现出退缩行为(下游漂移或释放后移动,这会影响它们的继续迁徙)。我们使用主动和被动遥测来量化标记和易位的白鲟通过后的运动。在克莱本船闸和大坝(CLD)上迁移的鱼类一旦迁移,就会表现出逆流而上的运动,并且不会表现出倒退(即下游运动延迟或上游没有继续)。相对于产卵期的运动时间并不影响最初的鱼类运动或到达下一个上游水坝的可能性(米勒轮渡船闸和水坝;MFLD,大约。在观察的前30天内,有更多的鱼在产卵前早期被标记和释放,它们进入了距离MFLD (MFLD下方最近的接收器位置)4.83公里的范围内,而不是产卵前或产卵期的鱼。在该区域上方放生的鱼类,其后在其放生地点下游被发现的可能性较低于在该区域下方放生的鱼类。我们的研究结果表明,尽管栖息地发生了变化,但白鲟一旦经过一个结构,就会继续向上游迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Movement of Paddlefish Once Past a Lock‐and‐Dam Structure on the Alabama River
Abstract Movement of fish past dams can be facilitated by dedicated fish passage structures, navigational locks, and crested spillways, with the efficacy of a passage structure depending strongly on the nature of the systems (height of the dam, flow rate, etc.) and the fish's behavior and swimming capability. However, once past a dam whether by the use of a mitigation structure or due to active translocation, fish encounter a different habitat upstream versus in the tailrace, potentially affecting their ability to continue their upstream migration. Here we had two objectives: First, we determined whether Paddlefish Polyodon spathula that successfully passed a structure continued on their upstream migration. Because assuring passage by tagged fish required that we move fish past the dam, our second objective was to determine whether translocated fish exhibited fallback behavior (downstream drift or movement post‐release that would compromise their continued migration). We used both active and passive telemetry to quantify post‐passage movements of tagged and translocated Paddlefish. Fish translocated above Claiborne Lock and Dam (CLD) exhibited up‐river movements once translocated and exhibited no fallback (i.e., downstream movement with delayed or no continuation upstream). Timing of movement relative to spawning periods did not influence initial fish movement or the likelihood of reaching the next upstream dam (Millers Ferry Lock and Dam; MFLD, approx. 100 river km upstream) within the first 30‐days of observation, but more fish tagged and released during the early pre‐spawning period made it within 4.83 km of MFLD (the location of our closest receiver below MFLD) than did fish from pre‐spawning or spawning periods. Fish released above CLD had a lower probability of being subsequently detected downstream of their release sites compared to fish released below CLD. Our findings support that Paddlefish will continue their upstream migration once past a structure despite changes in habitat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Transactions of the American Fisheries Society is a highly regarded international journal of fisheries science that has been published continuously since 1872. It features results of basic and applied research in genetics, physiology, biology, ecology, population dynamics, economics, health, culture, and other topics germane to marine and freshwater finfish and shellfish and their respective fisheries and environments.
期刊最新文献
Climate winners: Adapting to shifting species in the New England supply chain Acoustic telemetry yields stock membership clues for Coho Salmon harvested in coastal fisheries Advances in the Ecology of Stream‐Dwelling Salmonids. Edited by JavierLobon‐Cervia, PhaedraBudy, and RobertGresswell. Springer, Fish and Fisheries Series volume 44. 2024. 740 pages. $219.00 (e‐book), $279.99 (hardcover). Seasonal movements between main stem and tributaries may facilitate the persistence of Roundtail Chub and Flannelmouth Sucker within an altered stream system Spatial and temporal variability of movements among sympatric salmonids in an unfragmented inland watershed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1