{"title":"高等教育学生满意度与网络学习成功:一个生态学的视角","authors":"Asmahan Masry-Herzallah, Peleg Dor-Haim","doi":"10.29333/iji.2023.16448a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined Jewish and Arab graduate students` satisfaction and success in an asynchronous online course (OC) in Israel, analyzing the correlations between student characteristics/background, design features and learning outcomes. Guided by Bronfenbrener`s ecological model, the study employed quantitative and qualitative approaches. 174 students studying for master's degrees in education at a college in central Israel participated in the research, responding to a specially constructed online questionnaire as well as 12 semi-structured interviews. Additionally, the grades received by the students for their course assignments were analysed. Quantitative data analysis found: 1. Students` technological self-efficacy (TSE) predicts a correlation between intrinsic motivation and OC satisfaction. 2. The variables that predict the students' satisfaction with the OC: positive perception of the course assignments as understandable and useful; effectiveness of the learning process and good quality of communication with the lecturer. 3. The sector variable (Arab / Jewish) was found to moderate the correlation of the Jewish students' (JS) and Arab students' (AS) final grades with a contribution from various means of learning. Thus, when AS felt that they received a contribution from the use of more learning means, they achieved higher grades. The AS found it difficult to adapt to the independent learning style needed for the OC. Qualitative data, gathered from the open-ended questions and interviews with the students` were triangulated, reinforcing findings and explaining the quantitative data. Findings revealed three categories described the differences in satisfaction between the JS and AS throughout the course: Learners' attitude toward a course built from assignments, learning independently, Contacting the lecturer for assistance. Theoretical and practical implications are noted.","PeriodicalId":46858,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Instruction","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher Education Student Satisfaction and Success in Online Learning: An Ecological Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Asmahan Masry-Herzallah, Peleg Dor-Haim\",\"doi\":\"10.29333/iji.2023.16448a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined Jewish and Arab graduate students` satisfaction and success in an asynchronous online course (OC) in Israel, analyzing the correlations between student characteristics/background, design features and learning outcomes. Guided by Bronfenbrener`s ecological model, the study employed quantitative and qualitative approaches. 174 students studying for master's degrees in education at a college in central Israel participated in the research, responding to a specially constructed online questionnaire as well as 12 semi-structured interviews. Additionally, the grades received by the students for their course assignments were analysed. Quantitative data analysis found: 1. Students` technological self-efficacy (TSE) predicts a correlation between intrinsic motivation and OC satisfaction. 2. The variables that predict the students' satisfaction with the OC: positive perception of the course assignments as understandable and useful; effectiveness of the learning process and good quality of communication with the lecturer. 3. The sector variable (Arab / Jewish) was found to moderate the correlation of the Jewish students' (JS) and Arab students' (AS) final grades with a contribution from various means of learning. Thus, when AS felt that they received a contribution from the use of more learning means, they achieved higher grades. The AS found it difficult to adapt to the independent learning style needed for the OC. Qualitative data, gathered from the open-ended questions and interviews with the students` were triangulated, reinforcing findings and explaining the quantitative data. Findings revealed three categories described the differences in satisfaction between the JS and AS throughout the course: Learners' attitude toward a course built from assignments, learning independently, Contacting the lecturer for assistance. Theoretical and practical implications are noted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Instruction\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16448a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16448a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Higher Education Student Satisfaction and Success in Online Learning: An Ecological Perspective
This study examined Jewish and Arab graduate students` satisfaction and success in an asynchronous online course (OC) in Israel, analyzing the correlations between student characteristics/background, design features and learning outcomes. Guided by Bronfenbrener`s ecological model, the study employed quantitative and qualitative approaches. 174 students studying for master's degrees in education at a college in central Israel participated in the research, responding to a specially constructed online questionnaire as well as 12 semi-structured interviews. Additionally, the grades received by the students for their course assignments were analysed. Quantitative data analysis found: 1. Students` technological self-efficacy (TSE) predicts a correlation between intrinsic motivation and OC satisfaction. 2. The variables that predict the students' satisfaction with the OC: positive perception of the course assignments as understandable and useful; effectiveness of the learning process and good quality of communication with the lecturer. 3. The sector variable (Arab / Jewish) was found to moderate the correlation of the Jewish students' (JS) and Arab students' (AS) final grades with a contribution from various means of learning. Thus, when AS felt that they received a contribution from the use of more learning means, they achieved higher grades. The AS found it difficult to adapt to the independent learning style needed for the OC. Qualitative data, gathered from the open-ended questions and interviews with the students` were triangulated, reinforcing findings and explaining the quantitative data. Findings revealed three categories described the differences in satisfaction between the JS and AS throughout the course: Learners' attitude toward a course built from assignments, learning independently, Contacting the lecturer for assistance. Theoretical and practical implications are noted.
期刊介绍:
nternational Journal of Instruction is an internationally recognized journal in the field of education and is published four times a year (in January, April, July & October). The aim of this journal is to publish high quality studies in the areas of instruction, learning, teaching, curriculum development, learning environments, teacher education, educational technology, educational developments. Studies may relate to any age level - from infants to adults. IJI, being an international journal, our editorial advisory board members are from various countries around the world. The articles sent to the Journal are always reviewed by two members of the Editorial Advisory Board (double blind peer review), and in some cases, if necessary, by another member of the Board. Depending on the evaluation reports of the members of the Editorial Advisory Board, articles are published or not. Article evaluation process takes approximately three months. The authors are responsible for the errors, if any, in their published articles. The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously.