什么能预测大学生的反馈素养?认知信念的影响与批判性思维的中介作用

IF 2.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1080/13562517.2023.2280268
Ying Zhan, Zhi Hong Wan, Munty Khon
{"title":"什么能预测大学生的反馈素养?认知信念的影响与批判性思维的中介作用","authors":"Ying Zhan, Zhi Hong Wan, Munty Khon","doi":"10.1080/13562517.2023.2280268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTStudent feedback literacy is emphasised in recent literature as a critical attribute of university graduates. Although the impacts of epistemic beliefs on specific dimensions of student feedback literacy have been discussed in the literature, there is still a lack of quantitative research to investigate the strength of such impacts. This study explores the impact of epistemic beliefs on student feedback literacy among 727 Cambodian undergraduate students, using structural equation modelling. Results reveal that the complexity dimension of epistemic beliefs positively influences student feedback literacy, both directly and indirectly through critical thinking. Meanwhile, the source dimension directly influences student feedback literacy positively, but indirectly negatively through critical thinking. The justification dimension indirectly benefits student feedback literacy through critical thinking, while the certainty dimension has a direct negative effect. The study concludes that nurturing dialectic epistemic beliefs and critical thinking is vital for developing feedback-literate students in higher education.KEYWORDS: Student feedback literacyCambodian undergraduate studentsepistemic beliefscritical thinking Ethical disclosure statementThis study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at Author 1’s university. A reference number is 2021-2022-0328. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by The Education University of Hong Kong: [Grant Number RG76/2020-2021R].","PeriodicalId":22198,"journal":{"name":"Teaching in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What predicts undergraduates’ student feedback literacy? Impacts of epistemic beliefs and mediation of critical thinking\",\"authors\":\"Ying Zhan, Zhi Hong Wan, Munty Khon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13562517.2023.2280268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTStudent feedback literacy is emphasised in recent literature as a critical attribute of university graduates. Although the impacts of epistemic beliefs on specific dimensions of student feedback literacy have been discussed in the literature, there is still a lack of quantitative research to investigate the strength of such impacts. This study explores the impact of epistemic beliefs on student feedback literacy among 727 Cambodian undergraduate students, using structural equation modelling. Results reveal that the complexity dimension of epistemic beliefs positively influences student feedback literacy, both directly and indirectly through critical thinking. Meanwhile, the source dimension directly influences student feedback literacy positively, but indirectly negatively through critical thinking. The justification dimension indirectly benefits student feedback literacy through critical thinking, while the certainty dimension has a direct negative effect. The study concludes that nurturing dialectic epistemic beliefs and critical thinking is vital for developing feedback-literate students in higher education.KEYWORDS: Student feedback literacyCambodian undergraduate studentsepistemic beliefscritical thinking Ethical disclosure statementThis study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at Author 1’s university. A reference number is 2021-2022-0328. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by The Education University of Hong Kong: [Grant Number RG76/2020-2021R].\",\"PeriodicalId\":22198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2280268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2280268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要学生反馈素养作为大学毕业生的一项重要素质,受到近年来文献的重视。虽然已有文献讨论了认知信念对学生反馈素养具体维度的影响,但仍缺乏定量研究来调查这种影响的强度。本研究利用结构方程模型,探讨了认知信念对727名柬埔寨大学生反馈素养的影响。结果表明,认知信念的复杂性维度通过批判性思维直接和间接地影响学生的反馈素养。同时,源维度通过批判性思维对学生反馈素养产生正向直接影响,但间接产生负向影响。正当性维度通过批判性思维间接促进学生反馈素养,而确定性维度对学生反馈素养有直接的负面影响。研究认为,培养辩证认知信念和批判性思维对于培养具有反馈素养的高等教育学生至关重要。关键词:学生反馈素养柬埔寨大学生传染病信仰批判性思维伦理披露声明本研究已获得作者1所在大学人类研究伦理委员会批准。参考号码:2021-2022-0328。作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由香港教育大学资助:[资助号:RG76/2020-2021R]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What predicts undergraduates’ student feedback literacy? Impacts of epistemic beliefs and mediation of critical thinking
ABSTRACTStudent feedback literacy is emphasised in recent literature as a critical attribute of university graduates. Although the impacts of epistemic beliefs on specific dimensions of student feedback literacy have been discussed in the literature, there is still a lack of quantitative research to investigate the strength of such impacts. This study explores the impact of epistemic beliefs on student feedback literacy among 727 Cambodian undergraduate students, using structural equation modelling. Results reveal that the complexity dimension of epistemic beliefs positively influences student feedback literacy, both directly and indirectly through critical thinking. Meanwhile, the source dimension directly influences student feedback literacy positively, but indirectly negatively through critical thinking. The justification dimension indirectly benefits student feedback literacy through critical thinking, while the certainty dimension has a direct negative effect. The study concludes that nurturing dialectic epistemic beliefs and critical thinking is vital for developing feedback-literate students in higher education.KEYWORDS: Student feedback literacyCambodian undergraduate studentsepistemic beliefscritical thinking Ethical disclosure statementThis study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at Author 1’s university. A reference number is 2021-2022-0328. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by The Education University of Hong Kong: [Grant Number RG76/2020-2021R].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching in Higher Education
Teaching in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Teaching in Higher Education has become an internationally recognised field, which is more than ever open to multiple forms of contestation. However, the intellectual challenge which teaching presents has been inadequately acknowledged and theorised in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education addresses this gap by publishing scholarly work that critically examines and interrogates the values and presuppositions underpinning teaching, introduces theoretical perspectives and insights drawn from different disciplinary and methodological frameworks, and considers how teaching and research can be brought into a closer relationship. The journal welcomes contributions that aim to develop sustained reflection, investigation and critique, and that critically identify new agendas for research, for example by: examining the impact on teaching exerted by wider contextual factors such as policy, funding, institutional change and the expectations of society; developing conceptual analyses of pedagogical issues and debates, such as authority, power, assessment and the nature of understanding; exploring the various values which underlie teaching including those concerned with social justice and equity; offering critical accounts of lived experiences of higher education pedagogies which bring together theory and practice. Authors are strongly encouraged to engage with and build on previous contributions and issues raised in the journal. Please note that the journal does not publish: -descriptions and/or evaluations of policy and/or practice; -localised case studies that are not contextualized and theorised; -large-scale surveys that are not theoretically and critically analysed; -studies that simply replicate previous work without establishing originality.
期刊最新文献
Students as co-researchers: participatory methods for decolonising research in teaching and learning in higher education Authentic assessment as relational pedagogy ‘See us’: an urgent call to collaborate with colleagues in crisis environments around the world Why we need a cyberfeminist perspective for quality online higher education Proverbial teachings on sustainability: critical dialogues on traditional proverbs and zine-making in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1