《非洲的兽性与殖民主体性:尼日利亚的人类与非人类生物》作者:萨希德·阿德托

{"title":"《非洲的兽性与殖民主体性:尼日利亚的人类与非人类生物》作者:萨希德·阿德托","authors":"","doi":"10.2979/at.2023.a905853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria by Saheed Aderinto Odinaka Kingsley Eze Aderinto, Saheed. 2022. Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria. New African Histories. Athens: Ohio University Press. 261 pp. $80.00 (hardcover), $36.95 (paperback). Since the 1990s, African historians have been encouraged to investigate the complexities of the colonial past, the intricacies of its operation and imagination, and the interplay of power beyond the locale in a more extensive manner, one that would demonstrate the connectivity of Africa's past with global history while writing for African audiences. Saheed Aderinto's Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa not only answers this call, but charts innovative and groundbreaking terrain in African historiography. In only a few books on African history will readers find interactions between humans and animals, involving symbolism, representation, and embedded characterization of animal personae in historical narratives, as Aderinto has done—which compels us to rethink and reimagine what we know about history, how we interpret it, why we choose a particular narrative over another, and the implications of what we decide to write about in the present. Indeed, Aderinto's prescient inclination makes this book capable of stimulating other scholars to undertake further research in this field. Moreover, writing a history that includes animals not only assigns agency to them, but lifts them from their position as objects to subjects, whose place is not \"at the nibbling edge\" in the footnotes of African historical texts, conferences, and journals (5). Aderinto boldly seeks to challenge the conceptualization of history as a discipline that has concentrated on the human past, sidelining animals despite ubiquitous relationships forged between them and humans since time immemorial. Therefore, Aderinto insists that \"we may not truly comprehend the extent of imperial domination until we bring animals into our understanding of colonialism\" (3). He uses animals to portray familiar themes in African historiographies, such as colonial modernity and civilization, ideology and subjecthood, ethnicity, violence, resistance and hegemony, and colonial power and nationalism. For instance, discussing dogs, he contends that dogs owned by British colonial administrators enjoyed more privileges than their counterparts that belonged to Africans. [End Page 103] Similarly, Aderinto weaves donkeys, cattle, and horses into the tapestry of the colonial political economy. Donkeys and horses were significant for transportation—which made them accomplices in colonial conquest and consolidation, utilized by the British colonial power to exploit Nigeria's resources. Donkeys conveyed mineral resources and agricultural products, but horses were the most reliable means of moving across unmotorable topographies and a spectacle of imperial domination. As these animals assisted the British colonizers in actualizing their day-to-day administration, Aderinto investigates their role in colonial modernity. Such discussions as the tons of materials a donkey should carry; the ways that the stables of horses should be built, cared for, and transported; the method to slaughter cattle for consumption to ensure it met public health standards; the control of stray dogs; combating the ritual murder of horses in southeastern Nigeria; and the restriction of wild animals in built environments are all elements of modernity that Aderinto observes have dotted the relationship of people and animals during the colonial period. In two equally paradoxical but complementary sections, Aderinto employs different animals to locate the convergence of the built environment, veterinary and human medicine, welfare, modernism, and nationalism. In chapter 1, he introduces the history of meat consumption in colonial Nigeria and how beef emerged as \"the primary source of protein in twentieth-century Nigeria\" (36). In chapter 2, he examines the roles that animals such as donkeys and horses played \"as combatants, working animals, symbols of pride and power and athletes\" (65). However, while beef became a protein staple, and horses and donkeys became spectacular animals in the colonial economy, Aderinto complicates this narrative by stressing how various colonial welfare policies attempted to control the consumption and management of these animals, whether as beasts of burden, athletes, or meat (chaps. 7–8). Furthermore, while chapter 3 features the \"social history of dogs in colonial Nigeria\" (93), chapter 5 highlights the pathology of rabies, its dreadfulness, and implications in colonial...","PeriodicalId":39703,"journal":{"name":"Africa Today","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria by Saheed Aderinto (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/at.2023.a905853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria by Saheed Aderinto Odinaka Kingsley Eze Aderinto, Saheed. 2022. Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria. New African Histories. Athens: Ohio University Press. 261 pp. $80.00 (hardcover), $36.95 (paperback). Since the 1990s, African historians have been encouraged to investigate the complexities of the colonial past, the intricacies of its operation and imagination, and the interplay of power beyond the locale in a more extensive manner, one that would demonstrate the connectivity of Africa's past with global history while writing for African audiences. Saheed Aderinto's Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa not only answers this call, but charts innovative and groundbreaking terrain in African historiography. In only a few books on African history will readers find interactions between humans and animals, involving symbolism, representation, and embedded characterization of animal personae in historical narratives, as Aderinto has done—which compels us to rethink and reimagine what we know about history, how we interpret it, why we choose a particular narrative over another, and the implications of what we decide to write about in the present. Indeed, Aderinto's prescient inclination makes this book capable of stimulating other scholars to undertake further research in this field. Moreover, writing a history that includes animals not only assigns agency to them, but lifts them from their position as objects to subjects, whose place is not \\\"at the nibbling edge\\\" in the footnotes of African historical texts, conferences, and journals (5). Aderinto boldly seeks to challenge the conceptualization of history as a discipline that has concentrated on the human past, sidelining animals despite ubiquitous relationships forged between them and humans since time immemorial. Therefore, Aderinto insists that \\\"we may not truly comprehend the extent of imperial domination until we bring animals into our understanding of colonialism\\\" (3). He uses animals to portray familiar themes in African historiographies, such as colonial modernity and civilization, ideology and subjecthood, ethnicity, violence, resistance and hegemony, and colonial power and nationalism. For instance, discussing dogs, he contends that dogs owned by British colonial administrators enjoyed more privileges than their counterparts that belonged to Africans. [End Page 103] Similarly, Aderinto weaves donkeys, cattle, and horses into the tapestry of the colonial political economy. Donkeys and horses were significant for transportation—which made them accomplices in colonial conquest and consolidation, utilized by the British colonial power to exploit Nigeria's resources. Donkeys conveyed mineral resources and agricultural products, but horses were the most reliable means of moving across unmotorable topographies and a spectacle of imperial domination. As these animals assisted the British colonizers in actualizing their day-to-day administration, Aderinto investigates their role in colonial modernity. Such discussions as the tons of materials a donkey should carry; the ways that the stables of horses should be built, cared for, and transported; the method to slaughter cattle for consumption to ensure it met public health standards; the control of stray dogs; combating the ritual murder of horses in southeastern Nigeria; and the restriction of wild animals in built environments are all elements of modernity that Aderinto observes have dotted the relationship of people and animals during the colonial period. In two equally paradoxical but complementary sections, Aderinto employs different animals to locate the convergence of the built environment, veterinary and human medicine, welfare, modernism, and nationalism. In chapter 1, he introduces the history of meat consumption in colonial Nigeria and how beef emerged as \\\"the primary source of protein in twentieth-century Nigeria\\\" (36). In chapter 2, he examines the roles that animals such as donkeys and horses played \\\"as combatants, working animals, symbols of pride and power and athletes\\\" (65). However, while beef became a protein staple, and horses and donkeys became spectacular animals in the colonial economy, Aderinto complicates this narrative by stressing how various colonial welfare policies attempted to control the consumption and management of these animals, whether as beasts of burden, athletes, or meat (chaps. 7–8). Furthermore, while chapter 3 features the \\\"social history of dogs in colonial Nigeria\\\" (93), chapter 5 highlights the pathology of rabies, its dreadfulness, and implications in colonial...\",\"PeriodicalId\":39703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa Today\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/at.2023.a905853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/at.2023.a905853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《非洲的动物和殖民主体:尼日利亚的人类和非人类生物》,作者:萨希德·阿德托,奥迪娜卡·金斯利。非洲的动物和殖民主体:尼日利亚的人类和非人类生物。《新非洲史》雅典:俄亥俄大学出版社,261页,精装版80.00美元,平装版36.95美元。自20世纪90年代以来,非洲历史学家被鼓励以更广泛的方式调查殖民历史的复杂性,其运作和想象的复杂性,以及超越区域的权力相互作用,这种方式将在为非洲读者写作的同时展示非洲过去与全球历史的联系。Saheed Aderinto的《非洲的动物性和殖民主体性》不仅回应了这一呼吁,而且在非洲史学中描绘了创新和开创性的领域。在少数几本关于非洲历史的书中,读者会发现人类与动物之间的互动,包括象征主义、代表性,以及在历史叙事中嵌入的动物人物特征,就像阿德托所做的那样——这迫使我们重新思考和重新想象我们对历史的了解,我们如何解释它,为什么我们选择一种特定的叙述而不是另一种叙述,以及我们决定在当前写作的内容的含义。的确,Aderinto的先见之明使得这本书能够激励其他学者在这一领域进行进一步的研究。此外,写一部包括动物在内的历史不仅赋予了它们代理的权力,而且将它们从客体的位置提升到主体的位置,在非洲历史文本、会议和期刊的脚注中,主体的位置不是“在小边缘”(5)。adderinto大胆地试图挑战历史的概念化,即历史是一门学科,专注于人类的过去,忽视了动物,尽管自古以来它们与人类之间就建立了无处不在的关系。因此,Aderinto坚持认为“只有将动物纳入我们对殖民主义的理解,我们才能真正理解帝国统治的程度”(3)。他用动物来描绘非洲史学中常见的主题,如殖民的现代性与文明、意识形态与主体性、种族、暴力、抵抗与霸权、殖民权力与民族主义。例如,在讨论狗时,他认为英国殖民统治者拥有的狗比非洲人拥有的狗享有更多的特权。同样地,Aderinto把驴、牛和马编织到殖民地政治经济的织锦中。驴和马在运输上很重要,这使它们成为殖民征服和巩固的帮凶,被英国殖民势力用来开发尼日利亚的资源。驴子运送矿产资源和农产品,但马是穿越不可移动的地形和帝国统治奇观的最可靠手段。当这些动物帮助英国殖民者实现他们的日常管理时,Aderinto调查了它们在殖民现代性中的作用。比如一头驴应该驮多少吨的东西;马厩的建造、照料和运输方式;屠宰供消费的牛以确保其符合公共卫生标准的方法;控制流浪狗;在尼日利亚东南部打击杀马仪式;以及在人造环境中对野生动物的限制,都是Aderinto观察到的点缀在殖民时期人与动物关系中的现代性元素。在两个同样矛盾但又互补的部分中,Aderinto使用不同的动物来定位建筑环境、兽医和人类医学、福利、现代主义和民族主义的交汇点。在第一章中,他介绍了尼日利亚殖民时期肉类消费的历史,以及牛肉如何成为“20世纪尼日利亚蛋白质的主要来源”(36)。在第二章中,他研究了驴和马等动物“作为战士、工作动物、骄傲和权力的象征以及运动员”所扮演的角色(65)。然而,当牛肉成为一种蛋白质主食,马和驴成为殖民地经济中引人注目的动物时,Aderinto强调各种殖民福利政策如何试图控制这些动物的消费和管理,无论是作为驮马,运动员还是肉类(第11章),使这种叙述变得复杂。7 - 8)。此外,第3章的特点是“尼日利亚殖民地的狗的社会历史”(93),第5章强调狂犬病的病理,它的可怕,以及在殖民地的影响……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria by Saheed Aderinto (review)
Reviewed by: Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria by Saheed Aderinto Odinaka Kingsley Eze Aderinto, Saheed. 2022. Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria. New African Histories. Athens: Ohio University Press. 261 pp. $80.00 (hardcover), $36.95 (paperback). Since the 1990s, African historians have been encouraged to investigate the complexities of the colonial past, the intricacies of its operation and imagination, and the interplay of power beyond the locale in a more extensive manner, one that would demonstrate the connectivity of Africa's past with global history while writing for African audiences. Saheed Aderinto's Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa not only answers this call, but charts innovative and groundbreaking terrain in African historiography. In only a few books on African history will readers find interactions between humans and animals, involving symbolism, representation, and embedded characterization of animal personae in historical narratives, as Aderinto has done—which compels us to rethink and reimagine what we know about history, how we interpret it, why we choose a particular narrative over another, and the implications of what we decide to write about in the present. Indeed, Aderinto's prescient inclination makes this book capable of stimulating other scholars to undertake further research in this field. Moreover, writing a history that includes animals not only assigns agency to them, but lifts them from their position as objects to subjects, whose place is not "at the nibbling edge" in the footnotes of African historical texts, conferences, and journals (5). Aderinto boldly seeks to challenge the conceptualization of history as a discipline that has concentrated on the human past, sidelining animals despite ubiquitous relationships forged between them and humans since time immemorial. Therefore, Aderinto insists that "we may not truly comprehend the extent of imperial domination until we bring animals into our understanding of colonialism" (3). He uses animals to portray familiar themes in African historiographies, such as colonial modernity and civilization, ideology and subjecthood, ethnicity, violence, resistance and hegemony, and colonial power and nationalism. For instance, discussing dogs, he contends that dogs owned by British colonial administrators enjoyed more privileges than their counterparts that belonged to Africans. [End Page 103] Similarly, Aderinto weaves donkeys, cattle, and horses into the tapestry of the colonial political economy. Donkeys and horses were significant for transportation—which made them accomplices in colonial conquest and consolidation, utilized by the British colonial power to exploit Nigeria's resources. Donkeys conveyed mineral resources and agricultural products, but horses were the most reliable means of moving across unmotorable topographies and a spectacle of imperial domination. As these animals assisted the British colonizers in actualizing their day-to-day administration, Aderinto investigates their role in colonial modernity. Such discussions as the tons of materials a donkey should carry; the ways that the stables of horses should be built, cared for, and transported; the method to slaughter cattle for consumption to ensure it met public health standards; the control of stray dogs; combating the ritual murder of horses in southeastern Nigeria; and the restriction of wild animals in built environments are all elements of modernity that Aderinto observes have dotted the relationship of people and animals during the colonial period. In two equally paradoxical but complementary sections, Aderinto employs different animals to locate the convergence of the built environment, veterinary and human medicine, welfare, modernism, and nationalism. In chapter 1, he introduces the history of meat consumption in colonial Nigeria and how beef emerged as "the primary source of protein in twentieth-century Nigeria" (36). In chapter 2, he examines the roles that animals such as donkeys and horses played "as combatants, working animals, symbols of pride and power and athletes" (65). However, while beef became a protein staple, and horses and donkeys became spectacular animals in the colonial economy, Aderinto complicates this narrative by stressing how various colonial welfare policies attempted to control the consumption and management of these animals, whether as beasts of burden, athletes, or meat (chaps. 7–8). Furthermore, while chapter 3 features the "social history of dogs in colonial Nigeria" (93), chapter 5 highlights the pathology of rabies, its dreadfulness, and implications in colonial...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Africa Today
Africa Today Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Africa Today, a leading journal for more than 50 years, has been in the forefront of publishing Africanist reform-minded research, and provides access to the best scholarly work from around the world on a full range of political, economic, and social issues. Active electronic and combined electronic/print subscriptions to this journal include access to the online backrun.
期刊最新文献
From Militia to Army: Ganda Koy's Struggle for Political Legitimacy in Mali Fragments of Legitimacy: Symbolic Constructions of Political Leadership in Twenty-First-Century Mali Prismatic Performances: Queer South Africa and the Fracturing of the Rainbow Nation by April Sizemore-Barber (review) Coups d'État, Political Legitimacy, and Instability in Mali Animality and Colonial Subjecthood in Africa: The Human and Nonhuman Creatures of Nigeria by Saheed Aderinto (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1