剖宫产能否预防羊水蜕膜引起的新生儿不良结局?

Amene Ranjbar , Sepideh Rezaei Ghamsari , Elham Taeidi , Vahid Mehrnoush , Fatemeh Darsareh
{"title":"剖宫产能否预防羊水蜕膜引起的新生儿不良结局?","authors":"Amene Ranjbar ,&nbsp;Sepideh Rezaei Ghamsari ,&nbsp;Elham Taeidi ,&nbsp;Vahid Mehrnoush ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Darsareh","doi":"10.1016/j.gocm.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Making decisions regarding the mode of delivery in the cases of meconium amniotic fluid (MAF) presents a challenge for healthcare providers. We aimed to compare the neonatal outcome of MAF cases delivered via cesarean section (CS) versus those delivered vaginally to determine if CS is a protective factor against the adverse neonatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective study, we assessed singleton pregnant mothers diagnosed with MAF who gave birth at a tertiary hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, between January 2020-2022. Mothers with certain adverse pregnancy conditions were excluded from the study. These conditions included: abnormal fetal heart rate and pattern, bloody amniotic fluid, malpresentation, abnormal placentation, chorioamnionitis, intrauterine growth restriction, intrauterine fetal death, obstructed labor, and maternal comorbidities. The MAF mothers were divided into two groups based on the method of delivery: those who had CS and those who had a normal vaginal delivery (NVD). Demographic factors, obstetrical factors, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 746 MAF mothers, 213 (28.5%) underwent CS, while 533 (71.4%) had NVD. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics. Among MAF mothers who had CS, 66.2% were primiparous, and 33.8% were multiparous. For those who had NVD, 35.1% were primiparous, and 64.9% were multiparous. The first and 5-min Apgar values, rates of asphyxia, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death were not statistically different between the two delivery modes. The rate of newborns who breastfed within the first hour did not differ depending on the mode of delivery. Although initial resuscitation steps were required more frequently in MAF mothers with NVD than in those with CS (11.1% vs. 2.3%), no correlation was found between the mode of delivery and the need for resuscitation using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our research findings suggest that there were no superior neonatal outcomes in terms of CS compared to NVD in MAF mothers. Further studies are needed to provide more substantial evidence to support this conclusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34826,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 241-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164623000830/pdfft?md5=53debc1b8f8317a6660d1daf74ccba7f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667164623000830-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does cesarean section prevent adverse neonatal outcomes associated with meconium amniotic fluid?\",\"authors\":\"Amene Ranjbar ,&nbsp;Sepideh Rezaei Ghamsari ,&nbsp;Elham Taeidi ,&nbsp;Vahid Mehrnoush ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Darsareh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gocm.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Making decisions regarding the mode of delivery in the cases of meconium amniotic fluid (MAF) presents a challenge for healthcare providers. We aimed to compare the neonatal outcome of MAF cases delivered via cesarean section (CS) versus those delivered vaginally to determine if CS is a protective factor against the adverse neonatal outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective study, we assessed singleton pregnant mothers diagnosed with MAF who gave birth at a tertiary hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, between January 2020-2022. Mothers with certain adverse pregnancy conditions were excluded from the study. These conditions included: abnormal fetal heart rate and pattern, bloody amniotic fluid, malpresentation, abnormal placentation, chorioamnionitis, intrauterine growth restriction, intrauterine fetal death, obstructed labor, and maternal comorbidities. The MAF mothers were divided into two groups based on the method of delivery: those who had CS and those who had a normal vaginal delivery (NVD). Demographic factors, obstetrical factors, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 746 MAF mothers, 213 (28.5%) underwent CS, while 533 (71.4%) had NVD. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics. Among MAF mothers who had CS, 66.2% were primiparous, and 33.8% were multiparous. For those who had NVD, 35.1% were primiparous, and 64.9% were multiparous. The first and 5-min Apgar values, rates of asphyxia, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death were not statistically different between the two delivery modes. The rate of newborns who breastfed within the first hour did not differ depending on the mode of delivery. Although initial resuscitation steps were required more frequently in MAF mothers with NVD than in those with CS (11.1% vs. 2.3%), no correlation was found between the mode of delivery and the need for resuscitation using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our research findings suggest that there were no superior neonatal outcomes in terms of CS compared to NVD in MAF mothers. Further studies are needed to provide more substantial evidence to support this conclusion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 241-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164623000830/pdfft?md5=53debc1b8f8317a6660d1daf74ccba7f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667164623000830-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164623000830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667164623000830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对于医护人员来说,在出现羊水过多(MAF)的情况下决定分娩方式是一项挑战。在这项回顾性研究中,我们对 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间在伊朗 Bandar Abbas 一家三级医院分娩的确诊为羊水过多症的单胎孕妇进行了评估。患有某些不良妊娠情况的母亲被排除在研究之外。这些情况包括:胎心率和胎型异常、血性羊水、胎位不正、胎盘异常、绒毛膜羊膜炎、胎儿宫内生长受限、胎儿宫内死亡、难产和产妇合并症。MAF产妇根据分娩方式分为两组:CS产妇和阴道正常分娩(NVD)产妇。结果 在 746 名 MAF 母亲中,213 人(28.5%)进行了 CS 分娩,533 人(71.4%)进行了 NVD 分娩。两组在人口统计学特征方面无明显差异。在进行CS的MAF母亲中,66.2%为初产妇,33.8%为多产妇。在进行 NVD 的产妇中,35.1% 为初产妇,64.9% 为多产妇。两种分娩方式的第一和5分钟Apgar值、窒息率、新生儿重症监护室入院率和新生儿死亡率没有统计学差异。在第一小时内进行母乳喂养的新生儿比率在分娩方式上没有差异。结论我们的研究结果表明,在 MAF 母亲中,CS 与 NVD 相比,新生儿结局并无优势。我们的研究结果表明,与 NVD 相比,CS 对 MAF 母亲的新生儿预后没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does cesarean section prevent adverse neonatal outcomes associated with meconium amniotic fluid?

Background

Making decisions regarding the mode of delivery in the cases of meconium amniotic fluid (MAF) presents a challenge for healthcare providers. We aimed to compare the neonatal outcome of MAF cases delivered via cesarean section (CS) versus those delivered vaginally to determine if CS is a protective factor against the adverse neonatal outcomes.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we assessed singleton pregnant mothers diagnosed with MAF who gave birth at a tertiary hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran, between January 2020-2022. Mothers with certain adverse pregnancy conditions were excluded from the study. These conditions included: abnormal fetal heart rate and pattern, bloody amniotic fluid, malpresentation, abnormal placentation, chorioamnionitis, intrauterine growth restriction, intrauterine fetal death, obstructed labor, and maternal comorbidities. The MAF mothers were divided into two groups based on the method of delivery: those who had CS and those who had a normal vaginal delivery (NVD). Demographic factors, obstetrical factors, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

Out of 746 MAF mothers, 213 (28.5%) underwent CS, while 533 (71.4%) had NVD. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics. Among MAF mothers who had CS, 66.2% were primiparous, and 33.8% were multiparous. For those who had NVD, 35.1% were primiparous, and 64.9% were multiparous. The first and 5-min Apgar values, rates of asphyxia, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death were not statistically different between the two delivery modes. The rate of newborns who breastfed within the first hour did not differ depending on the mode of delivery. Although initial resuscitation steps were required more frequently in MAF mothers with NVD than in those with CS (11.1% vs. 2.3%), no correlation was found between the mode of delivery and the need for resuscitation using logistic regression.

Conclusions

Our research findings suggest that there were no superior neonatal outcomes in terms of CS compared to NVD in MAF mothers. Further studies are needed to provide more substantial evidence to support this conclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of physical activity status and food patterns in adolescents with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: an analytical approach Chemotherapy response assessment using ultrasound in ovarian cancer Minimally invasive methods with no fibroid surgical removal to treat uterine fibroids: utility or advertising? Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection an add-on to conventional in vitro fertilisation for infertility without severe male factors? Relationship between the change of ATP level controlled by ectonucleotidases and endometriosis-associated infertility and pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1