莱布尼茨关于微积分基本定理的论证在GeoGebra中的可视化

IF 1.9 3区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, APPLIED Axioms Pub Date : 2023-10-23 DOI:10.3390/axioms12101000
Weimar Muñoz, Olga Lucía León, Vicenç Font
{"title":"莱布尼茨关于微积分基本定理的论证在GeoGebra中的可视化","authors":"Weimar Muñoz, Olga Lucía León, Vicenç Font","doi":"10.3390/axioms12101000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the literature, it is usually assumed that Leibniz described proof for the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) in 1693. However, did he really prove it? If the answer is no from today’s perspective, are there works in which Leibniz introduced arguments that can be understood as formulations and justifications of the FTC? In order to answer this question, we used a historiographic methodology with expert triangulation. From the study of Leibniz’s manuscripts describing the inverse problem of tangents and its relationship with the quadrature problem, we found evidence of a geometrical argument from which the FTC can be inferred. We present this argument using technological resources and modern notation. This result can be used to teach the FTC due to the existence of dynamic and geometrical software, which makes it suitable for the classroom. Moreover, it provides another interpretation of the FTC complementary to the interpretation using Riemann sums.","PeriodicalId":53148,"journal":{"name":"Axioms","volume":"53 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Visualization in GeoGebra of Leibniz’s Argument on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus\",\"authors\":\"Weimar Muñoz, Olga Lucía León, Vicenç Font\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/axioms12101000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the literature, it is usually assumed that Leibniz described proof for the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) in 1693. However, did he really prove it? If the answer is no from today’s perspective, are there works in which Leibniz introduced arguments that can be understood as formulations and justifications of the FTC? In order to answer this question, we used a historiographic methodology with expert triangulation. From the study of Leibniz’s manuscripts describing the inverse problem of tangents and its relationship with the quadrature problem, we found evidence of a geometrical argument from which the FTC can be inferred. We present this argument using technological resources and modern notation. This result can be used to teach the FTC due to the existence of dynamic and geometrical software, which makes it suitable for the classroom. Moreover, it provides another interpretation of the FTC complementary to the interpretation using Riemann sums.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Axioms\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Axioms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12101000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Axioms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12101000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在文献中,通常假设莱布尼茨在1693年描述了微积分基本定理(FTC)的证明。然而,他真的证明了这一点吗?如果从今天的角度来看,答案是否定的,那么莱布尼茨在其中引入的论点是否可以被理解为联邦贸易委员会的表述和理由?为了回答这个问题,我们使用了史学方法和专家三角测量法。通过对莱布尼茨描述切线逆问题及其与正交问题关系的手稿的研究,我们发现了可以推断出FTC的几何论证的证据。我们使用技术资源和现代符号来提出这个论点。由于动态和几何软件的存在,这一结果可以用于FTC的教学,使其适合于课堂。此外,它还提供了对FTC的另一种解释,以补充使用黎曼和的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Visualization in GeoGebra of Leibniz’s Argument on the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
In the literature, it is usually assumed that Leibniz described proof for the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (FTC) in 1693. However, did he really prove it? If the answer is no from today’s perspective, are there works in which Leibniz introduced arguments that can be understood as formulations and justifications of the FTC? In order to answer this question, we used a historiographic methodology with expert triangulation. From the study of Leibniz’s manuscripts describing the inverse problem of tangents and its relationship with the quadrature problem, we found evidence of a geometrical argument from which the FTC can be inferred. We present this argument using technological resources and modern notation. This result can be used to teach the FTC due to the existence of dynamic and geometrical software, which makes it suitable for the classroom. Moreover, it provides another interpretation of the FTC complementary to the interpretation using Riemann sums.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Axioms
Axioms Mathematics-Algebra and Number Theory
自引率
10.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Axiomatic theories in physics and in mathematics (for example, axiomatic theory of thermodynamics, and also either the axiomatic classical set theory or the axiomatic fuzzy set theory) Axiomatization, axiomatic methods, theorems, mathematical proofs Algebraic structures, field theory, group theory, topology, vector spaces Mathematical analysis Mathematical physics Mathematical logic, and non-classical logics, such as fuzzy logic, modal logic, non-monotonic logic. etc. Classical and fuzzy set theories Number theory Systems theory Classical measures, fuzzy measures, representation theory, and probability theory Graph theory Information theory Entropy Symmetry Differential equations and dynamical systems Relativity and quantum theories Mathematical chemistry Automata theory Mathematical problems of artificial intelligence Complex networks from a mathematical viewpoint Reasoning under uncertainty Interdisciplinary applications of mathematical theory.
期刊最新文献
Modified Two-Parameter Liu Estimator for Addressing Multicollinearity in the Poisson Regression Model Results of Third-Order Strong Differential Subordinations A Probabilistic Physico-Chemical Diffusion Model of the Key Drifting Parameter of Measuring Equipment Finite-Time Passivity and Synchronization for a Class of Fuzzy Inertial Complex-Valued Neural Networks with Time-Varying Delays Integer-Valued Split-BREAK Process with a General Family of Innovations and Application to Accident Count Data Modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1