维吉尔牧歌1.55的Meleager和Catullus

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 0 CLASSICS CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1086/726409
Taylor S. Coughlan
{"title":"维吉尔牧歌1.55的Meleager和Catullus","authors":"Taylor S. Coughlan","doi":"10.1086/726409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meleager’s pair of epigrams on a grasshopper and cicada (AP 7.195 = HE 12 and AP 7.196 = HE 13) were popular with Roman poets of the late Republic. Allusions to the companion epigrams feature in two of the most programmatically significant poems of the period, Catullus 2 and Vergil Eclogue 1. In this note, I propose a previously unrecognized allusive relationship between these two Latin poems and their engagement with the grasshopper epigram of Meleager. Both Catullus and Vergil recall the address to Meleager’s grasshopper at AP 7.195 as a παραμύθιον, but they interpret the meaning of the epithet quite differently. παραμύθιον has the attested meanings of either “encouragement/exhortation” or “consolation.” I argue that Vergil’s translation of παραμύθιον ὕπνου into somnum suadebit inire at Eclogue 1.55 is a direct response to Catullus’ earlier interpretation of παραμύθιον as solaciolum at 2.7. Vergil’s allusion to Catullus 2 serves to highlight the differences in erotic scenarios for the speaker of Catullus 2 and Tityrus and to demonstrate Vergil’s ability to creatively integrate Catullan erotic lyric into his bucolic poetic mode.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meleager and Catullus at Vergil <i>Eclogue</i> 1.55\",\"authors\":\"Taylor S. Coughlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Meleager’s pair of epigrams on a grasshopper and cicada (AP 7.195 = HE 12 and AP 7.196 = HE 13) were popular with Roman poets of the late Republic. Allusions to the companion epigrams feature in two of the most programmatically significant poems of the period, Catullus 2 and Vergil Eclogue 1. In this note, I propose a previously unrecognized allusive relationship between these two Latin poems and their engagement with the grasshopper epigram of Meleager. Both Catullus and Vergil recall the address to Meleager’s grasshopper at AP 7.195 as a παραμύθιον, but they interpret the meaning of the epithet quite differently. παραμύθιον has the attested meanings of either “encouragement/exhortation” or “consolation.” I argue that Vergil’s translation of παραμύθιον ὕπνου into somnum suadebit inire at Eclogue 1.55 is a direct response to Catullus’ earlier interpretation of παραμύθιον as solaciolum at 2.7. Vergil’s allusion to Catullus 2 serves to highlight the differences in erotic scenarios for the speaker of Catullus 2 and Tityrus and to demonstrate Vergil’s ability to creatively integrate Catullan erotic lyric into his bucolic poetic mode.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726409\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

梅莱格尔的一对关于蚱蜢和蝉的警句(AP 7.195 = HE 12和AP 7.196 = HE 13)在共和国后期的罗马诗人中很受欢迎。在这一时期最具程序性意义的两首诗中,《卡图卢斯2》和《维吉尔牧歌1》都有对同伴警句的暗示。在这篇笔记中,我提出了一种以前未被认识到的暗示关系,在这两首拉丁诗和它们与Meleager的蚱蜢警句之间的关系。卡图勒斯和维吉尔都记得,在AP 7.195,米莱格尔对蚱蜢的称呼是παραμ ν,但他们对这个称呼的解释却截然不同。παραμ ον有“鼓励/劝勉”或“安慰”的意思。我认为,维吉尔将παραμ ζ ον ν ν υ翻译成《牧歌》1.55章的somnum suadebit inire是对卡图卢斯早期在2.7章对παραμ ζ ον as solaciolum的解释的直接回应。维吉尔对卡图卢斯2的暗示是为了突出卡图卢斯2的讲述者和提蒂罗斯在情爱场景中的不同,并展示维吉尔创造性地将卡图卢斯2的情爱抒情融入他的田园诗歌模式的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meleager and Catullus at Vergil Eclogue 1.55
Meleager’s pair of epigrams on a grasshopper and cicada (AP 7.195 = HE 12 and AP 7.196 = HE 13) were popular with Roman poets of the late Republic. Allusions to the companion epigrams feature in two of the most programmatically significant poems of the period, Catullus 2 and Vergil Eclogue 1. In this note, I propose a previously unrecognized allusive relationship between these two Latin poems and their engagement with the grasshopper epigram of Meleager. Both Catullus and Vergil recall the address to Meleager’s grasshopper at AP 7.195 as a παραμύθιον, but they interpret the meaning of the epithet quite differently. παραμύθιον has the attested meanings of either “encouragement/exhortation” or “consolation.” I argue that Vergil’s translation of παραμύθιον ὕπνου into somnum suadebit inire at Eclogue 1.55 is a direct response to Catullus’ earlier interpretation of παραμύθιον as solaciolum at 2.7. Vergil’s allusion to Catullus 2 serves to highlight the differences in erotic scenarios for the speaker of Catullus 2 and Tityrus and to demonstrate Vergil’s ability to creatively integrate Catullan erotic lyric into his bucolic poetic mode.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.
期刊最新文献
:Homer in Wittenberg: Rhetoric, Scholarship, Prayer :Co-workers in the Kingdom of Culture: Classics and Cosmopolitanism in the Thought of W. E. B. Du Bois Maius opus moveo: Vergil’s Hidden Signature in Aeneid 7.45? Matronymics at Work: Female Succession Techniques in Lucian’s Dialogi meretricii and Some Early Thecla Literature Hesiodic Justice and the Canonicity of the Catalogue of Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1