Pedro David Delgado-López, Antonio Montalvo-Afonso, Javier Martín-Alonso, Vicente Martín-Velasco, Rubén Diana-Martín, José Manuel Castilla-Díez
{"title":"通过客观估计表面不规则程度预测无症状脑膜瘤的组织学分级","authors":"Pedro David Delgado-López, Antonio Montalvo-Afonso, Javier Martín-Alonso, Vicente Martín-Velasco, Rubén Diana-Martín, José Manuel Castilla-Díez","doi":"10.1016/j.neucir.2023.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Predicting the histopathologic grade of meningioma is relevant because local recurrence is significantly greater in WHO grade II–III compared to WHO grade I tumors, which would ideally benefit from a more aggressive surgical strategy. It has been suggested that higher WHO grade tumors are more irregularly-shaped. However, irregularity is a subjective and observer-dependent feature. In this study, the tumor surface irregularity of a large series of meningiomas, measured upon preoperative MRI, is quantified and correlated with the WHO grade.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unicentric retrospective observational study of a cohort of symptomatic meningiomas surgically removed in the time period between January 2015 and December 2022. Using specific segmentation software, the surface factor (SF) was calculated for each meningioma. SF is an objective parameter that compares the surface of a sphere (minimum surface area for a given volume) with the same volume of the tumor against the actual surface of the tumor. This ratio varies from 0 to 1, being 1 the maximum sphericity. Since irregularly-shaped meningiomas present proportionally greater surface area, the SF tends to decrease as irregularity increases. SF was correlated with WHO grade and its predictive power was estimated with ROC curve analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 176 patients (64.7% females) were included in the study; 120 WHO grade I (71.9%), 43 WHO grade II (25.7%) and 4 WHO grade III (2.4%). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean SF of WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III tumors (0.8651<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.049 versus 0.7081<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.105, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001). Globally, the SF correctly classified more than 90% of cases (area under ROC curve 0.940) with 93.3% sensibility and 80.9% specificity. A cutoff value of 0.79 yielded the maximum precision, with positive and negative predictive powers of 82.6% and 92.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis yielded SF as an independent prognostic factor of WHO grade.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The <em>surface factor</em> is an objective and quantitative parameter that helps to identify aggressive meningiomas preoperatively. A cutoff value of 0.79 allowed differentiation between WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III with high precision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51145,"journal":{"name":"Neurocirugia","volume":"35 3","pages":"Pages 113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicción del grado histológico en meningiomas sintomáticos mediante una estimación objetiva de la irregularidad de su superficie\",\"authors\":\"Pedro David Delgado-López, Antonio Montalvo-Afonso, Javier Martín-Alonso, Vicente Martín-Velasco, Rubén Diana-Martín, José Manuel Castilla-Díez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neucir.2023.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Predicting the histopathologic grade of meningioma is relevant because local recurrence is significantly greater in WHO grade II–III compared to WHO grade I tumors, which would ideally benefit from a more aggressive surgical strategy. It has been suggested that higher WHO grade tumors are more irregularly-shaped. However, irregularity is a subjective and observer-dependent feature. In this study, the tumor surface irregularity of a large series of meningiomas, measured upon preoperative MRI, is quantified and correlated with the WHO grade.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unicentric retrospective observational study of a cohort of symptomatic meningiomas surgically removed in the time period between January 2015 and December 2022. Using specific segmentation software, the surface factor (SF) was calculated for each meningioma. SF is an objective parameter that compares the surface of a sphere (minimum surface area for a given volume) with the same volume of the tumor against the actual surface of the tumor. This ratio varies from 0 to 1, being 1 the maximum sphericity. Since irregularly-shaped meningiomas present proportionally greater surface area, the SF tends to decrease as irregularity increases. SF was correlated with WHO grade and its predictive power was estimated with ROC curve analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 176 patients (64.7% females) were included in the study; 120 WHO grade I (71.9%), 43 WHO grade II (25.7%) and 4 WHO grade III (2.4%). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean SF of WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III tumors (0.8651<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.049 versus 0.7081<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.105, <em>p</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.0001). Globally, the SF correctly classified more than 90% of cases (area under ROC curve 0.940) with 93.3% sensibility and 80.9% specificity. A cutoff value of 0.79 yielded the maximum precision, with positive and negative predictive powers of 82.6% and 92.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis yielded SF as an independent prognostic factor of WHO grade.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The <em>surface factor</em> is an objective and quantitative parameter that helps to identify aggressive meningiomas preoperatively. A cutoff value of 0.79 allowed differentiation between WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III with high precision.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocirugia\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 113-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocirugia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147323003901\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocirugia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130147323003901","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:预测脑膜瘤的组织病理学分级具有重要意义,因为与WHO分级为I级的肿瘤相比,WHO分级为II-III级的肿瘤的局部复发率要高得多。有人认为,WHO 分级越高的肿瘤形状越不规则。然而,不规则是一种主观的、依赖观察者的特征。本研究对术前核磁共振成像测量的大量脑膜瘤的肿瘤表面不规则度进行了量化,并将其与WHO分级相关联。方法对2015年1月至2022年12月期间手术切除的一组无症状脑膜瘤进行了非中心回顾性观察研究。使用特定的分割软件计算每个脑膜瘤的表面因子(SF)。SF 是一个客观参数,用于比较具有相同体积肿瘤的球体表面(给定体积的最小表面积)与肿瘤的实际表面。该比率从 0 到 1 不等,1 为最大球形度。由于形状不规则的脑膜瘤表面积按比例增大,因此 SF 值会随着不规则程度的增加而减小。研究共纳入 176 名患者(64.7% 为女性),其中 120 名为 WHO I 级(71.9%),43 名为 WHO II 级(25.7%),4 名为 WHO III 级(2.4%)。WHO I级和WHO II-III级肿瘤的平均SF值差异有统计学意义(0.8651 ± 0.049对0.7081 ± 0.105,p <0.0001)。在全球范围内,SF 能对 90% 以上的病例进行正确分类(ROC 曲线下面积为 0.940),灵敏度为 93.3%,特异度为 80.9%。截断值为 0.79 的精确度最高,阳性和阴性预测能力分别为 82.6% 和 92.6%。结论表面因子是一个客观的定量参数,有助于术前识别侵袭性脑膜瘤。0.79的临界值可以高精度地区分WHO I级和WHO II-III级。
Predicción del grado histológico en meningiomas sintomáticos mediante una estimación objetiva de la irregularidad de su superficie
Introduction
Predicting the histopathologic grade of meningioma is relevant because local recurrence is significantly greater in WHO grade II–III compared to WHO grade I tumors, which would ideally benefit from a more aggressive surgical strategy. It has been suggested that higher WHO grade tumors are more irregularly-shaped. However, irregularity is a subjective and observer-dependent feature. In this study, the tumor surface irregularity of a large series of meningiomas, measured upon preoperative MRI, is quantified and correlated with the WHO grade.
Methods
Unicentric retrospective observational study of a cohort of symptomatic meningiomas surgically removed in the time period between January 2015 and December 2022. Using specific segmentation software, the surface factor (SF) was calculated for each meningioma. SF is an objective parameter that compares the surface of a sphere (minimum surface area for a given volume) with the same volume of the tumor against the actual surface of the tumor. This ratio varies from 0 to 1, being 1 the maximum sphericity. Since irregularly-shaped meningiomas present proportionally greater surface area, the SF tends to decrease as irregularity increases. SF was correlated with WHO grade and its predictive power was estimated with ROC curve analysis.
Results
A total of 176 patients (64.7% females) were included in the study; 120 WHO grade I (71.9%), 43 WHO grade II (25.7%) and 4 WHO grade III (2.4%). A statistically significant difference was found between the mean SF of WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III tumors (0.8651 ± 0.049 versus 0.7081 ± 0.105, p < 0.0001). Globally, the SF correctly classified more than 90% of cases (area under ROC curve 0.940) with 93.3% sensibility and 80.9% specificity. A cutoff value of 0.79 yielded the maximum precision, with positive and negative predictive powers of 82.6% and 92.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis yielded SF as an independent prognostic factor of WHO grade.
Conclusion
The surface factor is an objective and quantitative parameter that helps to identify aggressive meningiomas preoperatively. A cutoff value of 0.79 allowed differentiation between WHO grade I and WHO grade II–III with high precision.
期刊介绍:
Neurocirugía is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Neurosurgery (SENEC). It is published every 2 months (6 issues per year). Neurocirugía will consider for publication, original clinical and experimental scientific works associated with neurosurgery and other related neurological sciences.
All manuscripts are submitted for review by experts in the field (peer review) and are carried out anonymously (double blind). The Journal accepts works written in Spanish or English.