创建全州评估和支持服务,预防血液透析患者感染

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.10.015
Chelsea M. Ludington MPH, CIC (is Unit Manager for the Infection Prevention Resource and Assessment Team (IPRAT), Infectious Disease Bureau, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.), Renee E. Brum MSN-IPC, RN, CIC, CPHQ (formerly Infection Preventionist, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, is Quality, Safety, and Experience Manager, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.), Denise I. Parr MSN-IPC, RN, CIC (is Dialysis and non-AR HAI Outbreak Lead for, IPRAT, Infectious Disease Bureau, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Please address correspondence to Chelsea M. Ludington)
{"title":"创建全州评估和支持服务,预防血液透析患者感染","authors":"Chelsea M. Ludington MPH, CIC (is Unit Manager for the Infection Prevention Resource and Assessment Team (IPRAT), Infectious Disease Bureau, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.),&nbsp;Renee E. Brum MSN-IPC, RN, CIC, CPHQ (formerly Infection Preventionist, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, is Quality, Safety, and Experience Manager, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.),&nbsp;Denise I. Parr MSN-IPC, RN, CIC (is Dialysis and non-AR HAI Outbreak Lead for, IPRAT, Infectious Disease Bureau, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Please address correspondence to Chelsea M. Ludington)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.10.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients who receive hemodialysis are at higher risk of developing health care–associated infections due to multiple factors, including direct and recurrent access to the bloodstream. Therefore, an effective infection prevention program should be in place to decrease the likelihood of these infections. Failure to assess gaps in systems and processes impedes the implementation of quality and performance improvement initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multidisciplinary team created an infection prevention dialysis evaluation program by using Six Sigma's Define-Measure-Analyze-Design-Verify model. These elements included content within the dialysis-specific Infection Control Assessment and Response Tool from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with supporting program assessment items. From August 2021 through August 2022, the team completed 17 inpatient dialysis assessments within the cohort's 17 facilities (long-term and acute care hospitals). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis, and the final analysis included 1,086 observations from the developed assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Deficiencies were grouped into seven major infection prevention categories among the 17 assessments, with the highest number of deficiencies seen within the categories of cleaning and disinfection (100%), hand hygiene (52.9%), and </span>personal protective equipment (PPE) use (52.9%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our program was successful at detecting gaps in dialysis-based infection prevention. By conducting data analysis of assessment findings, we can assist organizations in establishing priorities for quality and performance improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating a Statewide Assessment and Support Service to Prevent Infections in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea M. Ludington MPH, CIC (is Unit Manager for the Infection Prevention Resource and Assessment Team (IPRAT), Infectious Disease Bureau, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services.),&nbsp;Renee E. Brum MSN-IPC, RN, CIC, CPHQ (formerly Infection Preventionist, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, is Quality, Safety, and Experience Manager, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.),&nbsp;Denise I. Parr MSN-IPC, RN, CIC (is Dialysis and non-AR HAI Outbreak Lead for, IPRAT, Infectious Disease Bureau, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Please address correspondence to Chelsea M. Ludington)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.10.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients who receive hemodialysis are at higher risk of developing health care–associated infections due to multiple factors, including direct and recurrent access to the bloodstream. Therefore, an effective infection prevention program should be in place to decrease the likelihood of these infections. Failure to assess gaps in systems and processes impedes the implementation of quality and performance improvement initiatives.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A multidisciplinary team created an infection prevention dialysis evaluation program by using Six Sigma's Define-Measure-Analyze-Design-Verify model. These elements included content within the dialysis-specific Infection Control Assessment and Response Tool from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with supporting program assessment items. From August 2021 through August 2022, the team completed 17 inpatient dialysis assessments within the cohort's 17 facilities (long-term and acute care hospitals). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis, and the final analysis included 1,086 observations from the developed assessment tool.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Deficiencies were grouped into seven major infection prevention categories among the 17 assessments, with the highest number of deficiencies seen within the categories of cleaning and disinfection (100%), hand hygiene (52.9%), and </span>personal protective equipment (PPE) use (52.9%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our program was successful at detecting gaps in dialysis-based infection prevention. By conducting data analysis of assessment findings, we can assist organizations in establishing priorities for quality and performance improvement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725023002660\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725023002660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景接受血液透析的患者由于多种因素(包括直接和反复进入血流),发生医护相关感染的风险较高。因此,应制定有效的感染预防计划来降低发生这些感染的可能性。方法一个多学科团队利用六西格玛的定义-测量-分析-设计-验证模型创建了一个预防感染透析评估项目。这些要素包括美国疾病控制和预防中心的透析专用感染控制评估和响应工具中的内容,以及支持计划的评估项目。从 2021 年 8 月到 2022 年 8 月,该团队在同组的 17 家机构(长期和急症护理医院)内完成了 17 次住院透析评估。通过描述性统计分析对数据进行了分析,最终分析包括了从开发的评估工具中观察到的 1,086 项数据。结果在 17 项评估中,缺陷被分为七大感染预防类别,其中清洁和消毒(100%)、手部卫生(52.9%)和个人防护设备 (PPE) 使用(52.9%)类别中的缺陷数量最多。通过对评估结果进行数据分析,我们可以帮助医疗机构确定质量和绩效改进的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creating a Statewide Assessment and Support Service to Prevent Infections in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

Background

Patients who receive hemodialysis are at higher risk of developing health care–associated infections due to multiple factors, including direct and recurrent access to the bloodstream. Therefore, an effective infection prevention program should be in place to decrease the likelihood of these infections. Failure to assess gaps in systems and processes impedes the implementation of quality and performance improvement initiatives.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team created an infection prevention dialysis evaluation program by using Six Sigma's Define-Measure-Analyze-Design-Verify model. These elements included content within the dialysis-specific Infection Control Assessment and Response Tool from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with supporting program assessment items. From August 2021 through August 2022, the team completed 17 inpatient dialysis assessments within the cohort's 17 facilities (long-term and acute care hospitals). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis, and the final analysis included 1,086 observations from the developed assessment tool.

Results

Deficiencies were grouped into seven major infection prevention categories among the 17 assessments, with the highest number of deficiencies seen within the categories of cleaning and disinfection (100%), hand hygiene (52.9%), and personal protective equipment (PPE) use (52.9%).

Conclusion

Our program was successful at detecting gaps in dialysis-based infection prevention. By conducting data analysis of assessment findings, we can assist organizations in establishing priorities for quality and performance improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 50th Anniversary Article Collections: Diagnostic Excellence Supporting Professionalism in a Crisis Requires Leadership and a Well-Developed Plan. Quality and Simulation Professionals Should Collaborate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1