半城市直升机急救服务中的儿科插管:回顾性研究

Q3 Nursing Air Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.amj.2023.10.007
Sarah Morton FRCA, FFICM , Sinead Keane MSc , Matt O'Meara FRCA
{"title":"半城市直升机急救服务中的儿科插管:回顾性研究","authors":"Sarah Morton FRCA, FFICM ,&nbsp;Sinead Keane MSc ,&nbsp;Matt O'Meara FRCA","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2023.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>Although a small proportion of helicopter emergency medical service<span> (HEMS) missions are for pediatric patients, it is recognized that children do present unique challenges. This case series aims to evaluate the </span></span>intubation first-pass success rate in HEMS pediatric patients for both medical and trauma patients in a UK semiurban environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of the computerized records system was performed from January 1, 2015, to July 31, 2022, at 1 UK HEMS. Anonymous data relating to advanced airway interventions in patients<span> &lt; 16 years of age were extracted. Primary analysis related to the first-pass success rate was performed; secondary analysis relating to the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of the pediatric patients requiring prehospital anesthesia (rapid sequence induction with drugs) and first-pass success rates by clinician group was also performed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the pediatric patients, 15.8% required intubation. The overall first-pass success rate for intubation (including in cardiac arrest) was 83.5%; for prehospital anesthesia (drugs administered), it was 98.4%. First-pass success rates were lowest for those under 2 years of age (45.2% without drugs and 87.5% with drugs). There was no difference between physician background in the first-pass success rate. The median GCS for pediatric prehospital anesthesia was 7 versus 5 for adults (<em>P</em> = .012). No children with an initial GCS of 15 had prehospital anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The overall intubation first-pass success rates for pediatric patients is high at 83.5% and higher still for prehospital anesthesia (98.4%). However, it remains a rare intervention for clinicians, and children under 2 years of age require special consideration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 2","pages":"Pages 106-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Intubations in a Semiurban Helicopter Emergency Medicine Service: A Retrospective Review\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Morton FRCA, FFICM ,&nbsp;Sinead Keane MSc ,&nbsp;Matt O'Meara FRCA\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amj.2023.10.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>Although a small proportion of helicopter emergency medical service<span> (HEMS) missions are for pediatric patients, it is recognized that children do present unique challenges. This case series aims to evaluate the </span></span>intubation first-pass success rate in HEMS pediatric patients for both medical and trauma patients in a UK semiurban environment.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of the computerized records system was performed from January 1, 2015, to July 31, 2022, at 1 UK HEMS. Anonymous data relating to advanced airway interventions in patients<span> &lt; 16 years of age were extracted. Primary analysis related to the first-pass success rate was performed; secondary analysis relating to the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of the pediatric patients requiring prehospital anesthesia (rapid sequence induction with drugs) and first-pass success rates by clinician group was also performed.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the pediatric patients, 15.8% required intubation. The overall first-pass success rate for intubation (including in cardiac arrest) was 83.5%; for prehospital anesthesia (drugs administered), it was 98.4%. First-pass success rates were lowest for those under 2 years of age (45.2% without drugs and 87.5% with drugs). There was no difference between physician background in the first-pass success rate. The median GCS for pediatric prehospital anesthesia was 7 versus 5 for adults (<em>P</em> = .012). No children with an initial GCS of 15 had prehospital anesthesia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The overall intubation first-pass success rates for pediatric patients is high at 83.5% and higher still for prehospital anesthesia (98.4%). However, it remains a rare intervention for clinicians, and children under 2 years of age require special consideration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 106-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X23002432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X23002432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的虽然直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)任务中儿科病人所占比例很小,但人们认识到儿童确实是一个独特的挑战。本病例系列旨在评估在英国半城市环境中,直升机紧急医疗服务小儿患者的插管首次成功率,包括内科和创伤患者。提取了与 16 岁患者高级气道干预相关的匿名数据。进行了与首次通过成功率有关的主要分析;还进行了与需要院前麻醉(药物快速序列诱导)的儿科患者的初始格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和临床医生组首次通过成功率有关的次要分析。插管(包括心脏骤停患者)的总体首次成功率为 83.5%;院前麻醉(用药)的首次成功率为 98.4%。2 岁以下儿童的首次成功率最低(45.2% 未使用药物,87.5% 使用药物)。不同医生背景下的急救成功率没有差异。儿科院前麻醉的 GCS 中位数为 7,而成人为 5(P = .012)。结论儿科患者的总体插管首次通过成功率高达 83.5%,院前麻醉的成功率更高(98.4%)。然而,对于临床医生来说,这仍然是一项罕见的干预措施,2 岁以下的儿童需要特别考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pediatric Intubations in a Semiurban Helicopter Emergency Medicine Service: A Retrospective Review

Objective

Although a small proportion of helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) missions are for pediatric patients, it is recognized that children do present unique challenges. This case series aims to evaluate the intubation first-pass success rate in HEMS pediatric patients for both medical and trauma patients in a UK semiurban environment.

Methods

A retrospective review of the computerized records system was performed from January 1, 2015, to July 31, 2022, at 1 UK HEMS. Anonymous data relating to advanced airway interventions in patients < 16 years of age were extracted. Primary analysis related to the first-pass success rate was performed; secondary analysis relating to the initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of the pediatric patients requiring prehospital anesthesia (rapid sequence induction with drugs) and first-pass success rates by clinician group was also performed.

Results

Of the pediatric patients, 15.8% required intubation. The overall first-pass success rate for intubation (including in cardiac arrest) was 83.5%; for prehospital anesthesia (drugs administered), it was 98.4%. First-pass success rates were lowest for those under 2 years of age (45.2% without drugs and 87.5% with drugs). There was no difference between physician background in the first-pass success rate. The median GCS for pediatric prehospital anesthesia was 7 versus 5 for adults (P = .012). No children with an initial GCS of 15 had prehospital anesthesia.

Conclusion

The overall intubation first-pass success rates for pediatric patients is high at 83.5% and higher still for prehospital anesthesia (98.4%). However, it remains a rare intervention for clinicians, and children under 2 years of age require special consideration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Italian Search and Rescue Seaplanes From the 50s to the 70s: A Brave People and Mighty Aircraft Story November/December 2024 Forum Reducing Deep Sedation and Benzodiazepine Use in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During Critical Care Transport: A Quality Improvement Initiative
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1