臂丛腋窝阻断使用60ml 0.5%普拉卡因vs. 40ml 1%普拉卡因。对144例患者进行了注射后中心静脉血浓度测定和神经丛筋膜下压测定的临床研究。

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1990-07-01
J Jage, W Kossatz, J Biscoping, K U Zink, W Wagner
{"title":"臂丛腋窝阻断使用60ml 0.5%普拉卡因vs. 40ml 1%普拉卡因。对144例患者进行了注射后中心静脉血浓度测定和神经丛筋膜下压测定的临床研究。","authors":"J Jage,&nbsp;W Kossatz,&nbsp;J Biscoping,&nbsp;K U Zink,&nbsp;W Wagner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We estimated in this study the efficacy of axillary plexus blockade with 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% (300 mg). Following electrostimulation of the median, radial or ulnar nerve (depending on the area of the hand to be operated on), we injected prilocaine in two groups of patients (large volume group, 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% in 20 s; n = 114 patients; normal volume group, 40 ml prilocaine 1% in 20 s; n = 30 patients). Anesthesia of the median and ulnar nerves was virtually complete in all patients, but anesthesia of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves was complete in only 67% (radial) and 75% (musculocutaneous) in the group with normal injection volume. The injection of a larger volume but a lower concentration of prilocaine (300 mg) achieved better anesthesia of the radial (81%) and musculocutaneous (92%) nerves by 30-60 min after the injection. This difference was significant (p less than 0.05). The measurement of higher subfascial pressure in the axillary plexus following the larger volume of 60 ml than after 40 ml could explain the improved efficacy in overcoming anatomical hindrances in the plexus space. Estimation of the prilocaine concentration in the central venous blood 120 min after injection did not reveal different plasma concentrations in the two groups. The plasma concentrations were far below toxic levels. Only the time of plasma peak was earlier in the group with the larger volume, which was attributed to the larger area of diffusion of the vascular system in the plexus space.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"13 5","pages":"112-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Axillary blockade of the brachial plexus using 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% vs. 40 ml prilocaine 1%. A clinical study of 144 patients carried out by the determination of the prilocaine concentration in the central venous blood and by the measurement of the subfascial pressure in the plexus following the injection].\",\"authors\":\"J Jage,&nbsp;W Kossatz,&nbsp;J Biscoping,&nbsp;K U Zink,&nbsp;W Wagner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We estimated in this study the efficacy of axillary plexus blockade with 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% (300 mg). Following electrostimulation of the median, radial or ulnar nerve (depending on the area of the hand to be operated on), we injected prilocaine in two groups of patients (large volume group, 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% in 20 s; n = 114 patients; normal volume group, 40 ml prilocaine 1% in 20 s; n = 30 patients). Anesthesia of the median and ulnar nerves was virtually complete in all patients, but anesthesia of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves was complete in only 67% (radial) and 75% (musculocutaneous) in the group with normal injection volume. The injection of a larger volume but a lower concentration of prilocaine (300 mg) achieved better anesthesia of the radial (81%) and musculocutaneous (92%) nerves by 30-60 min after the injection. This difference was significant (p less than 0.05). The measurement of higher subfascial pressure in the axillary plexus following the larger volume of 60 ml than after 40 ml could explain the improved efficacy in overcoming anatomical hindrances in the plexus space. Estimation of the prilocaine concentration in the central venous blood 120 min after injection did not reveal different plasma concentrations in the two groups. The plasma concentrations were far below toxic levels. Only the time of plasma peak was earlier in the group with the larger volume, which was attributed to the larger area of diffusion of the vascular system in the plexus space.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"112-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们估计用0.5% (300mg)的60毫升丙罗卡因阻断腋窝神经丛的疗效。在电刺激正中神经、桡神经或尺神经(取决于待手术手的面积)后,两组患者注射丙拉卡因(大容量组,丙拉卡因60ml 0.5%, 20 s;N = 114例;正常容积组,1%丙胺卡因40 ml, 20 s;N = 30例)。在所有患者中,正中神经和尺神经的麻醉几乎完全,而在注射量正常的组中,桡神经和肌皮神经的麻醉完全率仅为67%(桡神经)和75%(肌皮神经)。大体积低浓度的丙罗卡因(300 mg)在注射后30-60 min对桡骨神经(81%)和肌皮神经(92%)的麻醉效果较好。差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。60ml容积大于40ml容积后腋窝神经丛的筋膜下压力升高,可以解释克服臂丛间隙解剖障碍的效果提高。注射后120 min中心静脉血浓度测定未见两组血药浓度差异。血浆浓度远低于中毒水平。只是体积越大的组血浆峰时间越早,这是由于血管系统在神经丛空间的扩散面积越大。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Axillary blockade of the brachial plexus using 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% vs. 40 ml prilocaine 1%. A clinical study of 144 patients carried out by the determination of the prilocaine concentration in the central venous blood and by the measurement of the subfascial pressure in the plexus following the injection].

We estimated in this study the efficacy of axillary plexus blockade with 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% (300 mg). Following electrostimulation of the median, radial or ulnar nerve (depending on the area of the hand to be operated on), we injected prilocaine in two groups of patients (large volume group, 60 ml prilocaine 0.5% in 20 s; n = 114 patients; normal volume group, 40 ml prilocaine 1% in 20 s; n = 30 patients). Anesthesia of the median and ulnar nerves was virtually complete in all patients, but anesthesia of the radial and musculocutaneous nerves was complete in only 67% (radial) and 75% (musculocutaneous) in the group with normal injection volume. The injection of a larger volume but a lower concentration of prilocaine (300 mg) achieved better anesthesia of the radial (81%) and musculocutaneous (92%) nerves by 30-60 min after the injection. This difference was significant (p less than 0.05). The measurement of higher subfascial pressure in the axillary plexus following the larger volume of 60 ml than after 40 ml could explain the improved efficacy in overcoming anatomical hindrances in the plexus space. Estimation of the prilocaine concentration in the central venous blood 120 min after injection did not reveal different plasma concentrations in the two groups. The plasma concentrations were far below toxic levels. Only the time of plasma peak was earlier in the group with the larger volume, which was attributed to the larger area of diffusion of the vascular system in the plexus space.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1