学生对创伤相关课程内容的反应

IF 2.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teaching in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1080/13562517.2023.2259810
Jessica D. Cless, Briana S. Nelson Goff
{"title":"学生对创伤相关课程内容的反应","authors":"Jessica D. Cless, Briana S. Nelson Goff","doi":"10.1080/13562517.2023.2259810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTHigher education courses frequently utilize trauma-related content material as part of the curriculum. To reduce the potential for secondary traumatic stress, it has been recommended that instructors be purposeful and cautious with the use of trauma-related materials in the classroom. Most recommendations for implementation of these materials are based on theory, as few empirical studies examine actual student reactions to this content. This study, guided by Hill's ABC-X Model, presents mixed methods survey data from undergraduate students enrolled in a trauma course across three semesters to measure trauma exposure and subjective reactions to course materials. Qualitative results indicated a range of emotional reactions to course content, with both positive and negative effects. Results support the notion that coping resources and appraisal of the content itself may influence how course content is experienced by students. Implications for teaching, policy, and future research are discussed.KEYWORDS: Traumatrauma-informedcollege teachingpedagogy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a University Small Research Grant and a College of Human Ecology Faculty Research Grant, both through a large Midwestern university.","PeriodicalId":22198,"journal":{"name":"Teaching in Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student reactions to trauma-related course content\",\"authors\":\"Jessica D. Cless, Briana S. Nelson Goff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13562517.2023.2259810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTHigher education courses frequently utilize trauma-related content material as part of the curriculum. To reduce the potential for secondary traumatic stress, it has been recommended that instructors be purposeful and cautious with the use of trauma-related materials in the classroom. Most recommendations for implementation of these materials are based on theory, as few empirical studies examine actual student reactions to this content. This study, guided by Hill's ABC-X Model, presents mixed methods survey data from undergraduate students enrolled in a trauma course across three semesters to measure trauma exposure and subjective reactions to course materials. Qualitative results indicated a range of emotional reactions to course content, with both positive and negative effects. Results support the notion that coping resources and appraisal of the content itself may influence how course content is experienced by students. Implications for teaching, policy, and future research are discussed.KEYWORDS: Traumatrauma-informedcollege teachingpedagogy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a University Small Research Grant and a College of Human Ecology Faculty Research Grant, both through a large Midwestern university.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching in Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2259810\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2259810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育课程经常使用与创伤相关的内容材料作为课程的一部分。为了减少继发性创伤压力的可能性,建议教师在课堂上使用与创伤相关的材料时要有目的和谨慎。大多数关于实施这些材料的建议都是基于理论的,因为很少有实证研究检查学生对这些内容的实际反应。本研究在Hill的ABC-X模型的指导下,采用混合方法调查了三个学期的创伤课程本科生的数据,以衡量创伤暴露和对课程材料的主观反应。定性结果显示了对课程内容的一系列情绪反应,既有积极的影响,也有消极的影响。结果支持这样的观点,即应对资源和对内容本身的评价可能会影响学生对课程内容的体验。讨论了对教学、政策和未来研究的影响。关键词:创伤知情大学教学教育学披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。本研究由一所大学小额研究基金和一所人类生态学院教员研究基金支持,这两所大学都是通过中西部一所大型大学进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Student reactions to trauma-related course content
ABSTRACTHigher education courses frequently utilize trauma-related content material as part of the curriculum. To reduce the potential for secondary traumatic stress, it has been recommended that instructors be purposeful and cautious with the use of trauma-related materials in the classroom. Most recommendations for implementation of these materials are based on theory, as few empirical studies examine actual student reactions to this content. This study, guided by Hill's ABC-X Model, presents mixed methods survey data from undergraduate students enrolled in a trauma course across three semesters to measure trauma exposure and subjective reactions to course materials. Qualitative results indicated a range of emotional reactions to course content, with both positive and negative effects. Results support the notion that coping resources and appraisal of the content itself may influence how course content is experienced by students. Implications for teaching, policy, and future research are discussed.KEYWORDS: Traumatrauma-informedcollege teachingpedagogy Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research was supported by a University Small Research Grant and a College of Human Ecology Faculty Research Grant, both through a large Midwestern university.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teaching in Higher Education
Teaching in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Teaching in Higher Education has become an internationally recognised field, which is more than ever open to multiple forms of contestation. However, the intellectual challenge which teaching presents has been inadequately acknowledged and theorised in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education addresses this gap by publishing scholarly work that critically examines and interrogates the values and presuppositions underpinning teaching, introduces theoretical perspectives and insights drawn from different disciplinary and methodological frameworks, and considers how teaching and research can be brought into a closer relationship. The journal welcomes contributions that aim to develop sustained reflection, investigation and critique, and that critically identify new agendas for research, for example by: examining the impact on teaching exerted by wider contextual factors such as policy, funding, institutional change and the expectations of society; developing conceptual analyses of pedagogical issues and debates, such as authority, power, assessment and the nature of understanding; exploring the various values which underlie teaching including those concerned with social justice and equity; offering critical accounts of lived experiences of higher education pedagogies which bring together theory and practice. Authors are strongly encouraged to engage with and build on previous contributions and issues raised in the journal. Please note that the journal does not publish: -descriptions and/or evaluations of policy and/or practice; -localised case studies that are not contextualized and theorised; -large-scale surveys that are not theoretically and critically analysed; -studies that simply replicate previous work without establishing originality.
期刊最新文献
Students as co-researchers: participatory methods for decolonising research in teaching and learning in higher education Authentic assessment as relational pedagogy ‘See us’: an urgent call to collaborate with colleagues in crisis environments around the world Why we need a cyberfeminist perspective for quality online higher education Proverbial teachings on sustainability: critical dialogues on traditional proverbs and zine-making in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1