用反事实概率分析避免了野火影响建模

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY Frontiers in Forests and Global Change Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.3389/ffgc.2023.1266413
Matthew P. Thompson, John F. Carriger
{"title":"用反事实概率分析避免了野火影响建模","authors":"Matthew P. Thompson, John F. Carriger","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1266413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing the effectiveness and measuring the performance of fuel treatments and other wildfire risk mitigation efforts are challenging endeavors. Perhaps the most complicated is quantifying avoided impacts. In this study, we show how probabilistic counterfactual analysis can help with performance evaluation. We borrow insights from the disaster risk mitigation and climate event attribution literature to illustrate a counterfactual framework and provide examples using ensemble wildfire simulations. Specifically, we reanalyze previously published fire simulation data from fire-prone landscapes in New Mexico, USA, and show applications for post-event analysis as well as pre-event evaluation of fuel treatment scenarios. This approach found that treated landscapes likely would have reduced fire risk compared to the untreated scenarios. To conclude, we offer ideas for future expansions in theory and methods.","PeriodicalId":12538,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"354 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avoided wildfire impact modeling with counterfactual probabilistic analysis\",\"authors\":\"Matthew P. Thompson, John F. Carriger\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1266413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessing the effectiveness and measuring the performance of fuel treatments and other wildfire risk mitigation efforts are challenging endeavors. Perhaps the most complicated is quantifying avoided impacts. In this study, we show how probabilistic counterfactual analysis can help with performance evaluation. We borrow insights from the disaster risk mitigation and climate event attribution literature to illustrate a counterfactual framework and provide examples using ensemble wildfire simulations. Specifically, we reanalyze previously published fire simulation data from fire-prone landscapes in New Mexico, USA, and show applications for post-event analysis as well as pre-event evaluation of fuel treatment scenarios. This approach found that treated landscapes likely would have reduced fire risk compared to the untreated scenarios. To conclude, we offer ideas for future expansions in theory and methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"volume\":\"354 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1266413\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1266413","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估燃料处理和其他减轻野火风险工作的有效性和绩效是一项具有挑战性的工作。也许最复杂的是量化可避免的影响。在本研究中,我们展示了概率反事实分析如何帮助绩效评估。我们借鉴了灾害风险缓解和气候事件归因文献中的见解来说明一个反事实框架,并提供了使用集合野火模拟的示例。具体来说,我们重新分析了以前发表的美国新墨西哥州火灾多发地区的火灾模拟数据,并展示了对燃料处理场景的事后分析和事前评估的应用。该方法发现,与未处理的场景相比,处理过的景观可能会降低火灾风险。最后,我们在理论和方法上为未来的扩展提供了思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Avoided wildfire impact modeling with counterfactual probabilistic analysis
Assessing the effectiveness and measuring the performance of fuel treatments and other wildfire risk mitigation efforts are challenging endeavors. Perhaps the most complicated is quantifying avoided impacts. In this study, we show how probabilistic counterfactual analysis can help with performance evaluation. We borrow insights from the disaster risk mitigation and climate event attribution literature to illustrate a counterfactual framework and provide examples using ensemble wildfire simulations. Specifically, we reanalyze previously published fire simulation data from fire-prone landscapes in New Mexico, USA, and show applications for post-event analysis as well as pre-event evaluation of fuel treatment scenarios. This approach found that treated landscapes likely would have reduced fire risk compared to the untreated scenarios. To conclude, we offer ideas for future expansions in theory and methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
256
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal plants together shape seedling diversity in a subtropical forest Juvenile hormone III induction reveals key genes in general metabolism, pheromone biosynthesis, and detoxification in Eurasian spruce bark beetle Multi-dimensional temperature sensitivity of protected tropical mountain rain forests Accelerating decline of wildfires in China in the 21st century Factors driving carbon accumulation in forest biomass and soil organic carbon across natural forests and planted forests in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1