{"title":"从实际角度平衡修正:结果值得付出代价吗?","authors":"Bun Chan, Junming Ho","doi":"10.1071/ch23101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study, we have examined the utility of counterpoise (CP) corrections, the zero-cost geometric counterpoise (gCP) correction, and the double-ζ vDZP basis set, in representative examples of computational chemistry investigations. The tests include reaction energies and barriers in mechanisms of catalysis, and binding of substrates with enzyme active sites. Drawbacks of the CP approach include: it is more costly than calculations with the same basis set without applying CP corrections, multiple computations may be required where a single species is used in multiple instances, and it is only applicable to intermolecular interactions. In comparison, using gCP or vDZP is less costly. Their overall accuracy is comparable to CP, although the three approaches show variable performances for different systems. Thus, the use of a large basis set remains more consistent in obtaining results that are closer to the basis-set limit. Where the computational cost poses a challenge, the use of gCP or vDZP would be more advantageous than CP in terms of cost and simplicity.","PeriodicalId":8575,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Chemistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Counterpoise correction from a practical perspective: is the result worth the cost?\",\"authors\":\"Bun Chan, Junming Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/ch23101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present study, we have examined the utility of counterpoise (CP) corrections, the zero-cost geometric counterpoise (gCP) correction, and the double-ζ vDZP basis set, in representative examples of computational chemistry investigations. The tests include reaction energies and barriers in mechanisms of catalysis, and binding of substrates with enzyme active sites. Drawbacks of the CP approach include: it is more costly than calculations with the same basis set without applying CP corrections, multiple computations may be required where a single species is used in multiple instances, and it is only applicable to intermolecular interactions. In comparison, using gCP or vDZP is less costly. Their overall accuracy is comparable to CP, although the three approaches show variable performances for different systems. Thus, the use of a large basis set remains more consistent in obtaining results that are closer to the basis-set limit. Where the computational cost poses a challenge, the use of gCP or vDZP would be more advantageous than CP in terms of cost and simplicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/ch23101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/ch23101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Counterpoise correction from a practical perspective: is the result worth the cost?
In the present study, we have examined the utility of counterpoise (CP) corrections, the zero-cost geometric counterpoise (gCP) correction, and the double-ζ vDZP basis set, in representative examples of computational chemistry investigations. The tests include reaction energies and barriers in mechanisms of catalysis, and binding of substrates with enzyme active sites. Drawbacks of the CP approach include: it is more costly than calculations with the same basis set without applying CP corrections, multiple computations may be required where a single species is used in multiple instances, and it is only applicable to intermolecular interactions. In comparison, using gCP or vDZP is less costly. Their overall accuracy is comparable to CP, although the three approaches show variable performances for different systems. Thus, the use of a large basis set remains more consistent in obtaining results that are closer to the basis-set limit. Where the computational cost poses a challenge, the use of gCP or vDZP would be more advantageous than CP in terms of cost and simplicity.
期刊介绍:
Australian Journal of Chemistry - an International Journal for Chemical Science publishes research papers from all fields of chemical science. Papers that are multidisciplinary or address new or emerging areas of chemistry are particularly encouraged. Thus, the scope is dynamic. It includes (but is not limited to) synthesis, structure, new materials, macromolecules and polymers, supramolecular chemistry, analytical and environmental chemistry, natural products, biological and medicinal chemistry, nanotechnology, and surface chemistry.
Australian Journal of Chemistry is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.