社会化代理人在支持新专业人员学习和调整时遇到的障碍:对定性证据的系统回顾

IF 4 2区 心理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276532
Elin Frögéli, Lena Backström Eriksson
{"title":"社会化代理人在支持新专业人员学习和调整时遇到的障碍:对定性证据的系统回顾","authors":"Elin Frögéli, Lena Backström Eriksson","doi":"10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New professionals’ learning and adjustment have implications for individuals and organizations alike. Some of the most important learning events happen when newcomers proactively engage in learning behaviours in everyday work contexts. Socialization agents (e.g., co-workers and supervisors) play an important role by encouraging and responding to proactive behaviours, but they are not always able to provide this support. Knowledge of the obstacles standing in their way could inform the design of programmes to increase their support of newcomers’ learning and adjustment. The objective of this study was to systematically review qualitative evidence of such obstacles in different occupations internationally. The search strategy included the electronic databases, Web of Science and Scopus. Twenty studies with 446 participants in total were included. Findings were synthesized using an analytical method for identifying what needs to be changed for a behaviour to be more likely to occur. The analysis showed that socialization agents’ support of new professionals’ learning is limited due to a lack of formal recognition of this work. We present a model of key obstacles to address to increase socialization agents’ capabilities, opportunities, and motivation for supporting new professionals’ learning and adjustment. OSF Registration: osf.io/wsczh/","PeriodicalId":48240,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","volume":"63 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstacles experienced by socialization agents as they support new professionals’ learning and adjustment: a systematic review of qualitative evidence\",\"authors\":\"Elin Frögéli, Lena Backström Eriksson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"New professionals’ learning and adjustment have implications for individuals and organizations alike. Some of the most important learning events happen when newcomers proactively engage in learning behaviours in everyday work contexts. Socialization agents (e.g., co-workers and supervisors) play an important role by encouraging and responding to proactive behaviours, but they are not always able to provide this support. Knowledge of the obstacles standing in their way could inform the design of programmes to increase their support of newcomers’ learning and adjustment. The objective of this study was to systematically review qualitative evidence of such obstacles in different occupations internationally. The search strategy included the electronic databases, Web of Science and Scopus. Twenty studies with 446 participants in total were included. Findings were synthesized using an analytical method for identifying what needs to be changed for a behaviour to be more likely to occur. The analysis showed that socialization agents’ support of new professionals’ learning is limited due to a lack of formal recognition of this work. We present a model of key obstacles to address to increase socialization agents’ capabilities, opportunities, and motivation for supporting new professionals’ learning and adjustment. OSF Registration: osf.io/wsczh/\",\"PeriodicalId\":48240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276532\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2023.2276532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新专业人士的学习和适应对个人和组织都有影响。一些最重要的学习事件发生在新员工在日常工作环境中主动参与学习行为的时候。社会化代理人(例如,同事和主管)在鼓励和回应主动行为方面发挥着重要作用,但他们并不总是能够提供这种支持。了解阻碍他们的障碍可以为设计方案提供信息,以增加他们对新来者学习和适应的支持。本研究的目的是系统地审查国际上不同职业中这种障碍的定性证据。搜索策略包括电子数据库、Web of Science和Scopus。20项研究共纳入446名参与者。研究结果是用一种分析方法合成的,该方法确定了需要改变什么才能使一种行为更有可能发生。分析表明,社会化代理人对新专业人员学习的支持是有限的,因为缺乏对这项工作的正式认可。我们提出了一个关键障碍的模型,以解决增加社会化代理人的能力、机会和动机,以支持新专业人员的学习和适应。OSF注册:OSF .io/wsczh/
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obstacles experienced by socialization agents as they support new professionals’ learning and adjustment: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
New professionals’ learning and adjustment have implications for individuals and organizations alike. Some of the most important learning events happen when newcomers proactively engage in learning behaviours in everyday work contexts. Socialization agents (e.g., co-workers and supervisors) play an important role by encouraging and responding to proactive behaviours, but they are not always able to provide this support. Knowledge of the obstacles standing in their way could inform the design of programmes to increase their support of newcomers’ learning and adjustment. The objective of this study was to systematically review qualitative evidence of such obstacles in different occupations internationally. The search strategy included the electronic databases, Web of Science and Scopus. Twenty studies with 446 participants in total were included. Findings were synthesized using an analytical method for identifying what needs to be changed for a behaviour to be more likely to occur. The analysis showed that socialization agents’ support of new professionals’ learning is limited due to a lack of formal recognition of this work. We present a model of key obstacles to address to increase socialization agents’ capabilities, opportunities, and motivation for supporting new professionals’ learning and adjustment. OSF Registration: osf.io/wsczh/
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology is to promote and support the development of Work and Organizational Psychology by publishing high-quality scientific articles that improve our understanding of phenomena occurring in work and organizational settings. The journal publishes empirical, theoretical, methodological, and review articles that are relevant to real-world situations. The journal has a world-wide authorship, readership and editorial board. Submissions from all around the world are invited.
期刊最新文献
Antecedents of physical sickness presenteeism during the COVID-19 pandemic Target pressure and corporate scandals: a natural language processing investigation of how organizational culture underlies institutional failures When identification with your group matters: leader consultation in response to constructive follower voice Can Harman’s single-factor test reliably distinguish between research designs? Not in published management studies Expertise and specialization in organizations: a social network analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1