上古晚期的自我和自私:普罗提诺在oikeiōsis

IF 0.7 3区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS JOURNAL OF HELLENIC STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1017/s0075426923000666
Daniel Regnier
{"title":"上古晚期的自我和自私:普罗提诺在oikeiōsis","authors":"Daniel Regnier","doi":"10.1017/s0075426923000666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Plotinus’ understanding of self is formulated largely in dialogue with the Stoics. In early works he categorically rejects the Stoic notion of the hēgemonikon (‘leading part’ or ‘commanding faculty’) of the soul. In this paper, I show how, in light of a general dissatisfaction with the Stoic account of self articulated in his early work, Plotinus deals with the Stoic notion of oikeiōsis (‘appropriation’). I argue that Plotinus’ understanding of oikeiōsis develops across the period during which he uses it. In his middle writings, Plotinus engages with Stoic oikeiōsis by exploring how it functions in contexts related to selfhood. In his later writings, he shows, on the one hand, how the concept of oikeiōsis can be Platonized, such as to account for the relation of the self to the Good, and, on the other, how the Stoic understanding of oikeiōsis is untenable for many of the same reasons that he rejects the Stoic notion of the hēgemonikon . Ultimately, Plotinus thinks that Stoic understandings of the hēgemonikon and oikeiōsis are untenable because they lead to something that could be characterized as ‘selfishness’.","PeriodicalId":46515,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF HELLENIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self and selfishness in Late Antiquity: Plotinus on <i>oikeiōsis</i>\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Regnier\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0075426923000666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Plotinus’ understanding of self is formulated largely in dialogue with the Stoics. In early works he categorically rejects the Stoic notion of the hēgemonikon (‘leading part’ or ‘commanding faculty’) of the soul. In this paper, I show how, in light of a general dissatisfaction with the Stoic account of self articulated in his early work, Plotinus deals with the Stoic notion of oikeiōsis (‘appropriation’). I argue that Plotinus’ understanding of oikeiōsis develops across the period during which he uses it. In his middle writings, Plotinus engages with Stoic oikeiōsis by exploring how it functions in contexts related to selfhood. In his later writings, he shows, on the one hand, how the concept of oikeiōsis can be Platonized, such as to account for the relation of the self to the Good, and, on the other, how the Stoic understanding of oikeiōsis is untenable for many of the same reasons that he rejects the Stoic notion of the hēgemonikon . Ultimately, Plotinus thinks that Stoic understandings of the hēgemonikon and oikeiōsis are untenable because they lead to something that could be characterized as ‘selfishness’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF HELLENIC STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF HELLENIC STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0075426923000666\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF HELLENIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0075426923000666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普罗提诺对自我的理解主要是在与斯多葛派的对话中形成的。在早期的作品中,他断然拒绝了斯多葛派关于灵魂hēgemonikon(“主导部分”或“指挥能力”)的观点。在本文中,我展示了普罗提诺在他早期的作品中对斯多葛派自我阐述的普遍不满,如何处理斯多葛派oikeiōsis(“挪用”)的概念。我认为普罗提诺对oikeiōsis的理解是随着他使用它的时期而发展的。在他的中期著作中,普罗提诺通过探索它在与自我相关的背景下如何发挥作用,与斯多葛学派oikeiōsis进行了接触。在他后来的著作中,一方面,他展示了oikeiōsis的概念是如何被柏拉图化的,例如解释自我与善的关系,另一方面,斯多葛派对oikeiōsis的理解是如何站不住脚的,原因与他拒绝hēgemonikon的斯多葛派概念相同。最后,普罗提诺认为斯多葛派对hēgemonikon和oikeiōsis的理解是站不住脚的,因为它们导致了一些可以被描述为“自私”的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self and selfishness in Late Antiquity: Plotinus on oikeiōsis
Abstract Plotinus’ understanding of self is formulated largely in dialogue with the Stoics. In early works he categorically rejects the Stoic notion of the hēgemonikon (‘leading part’ or ‘commanding faculty’) of the soul. In this paper, I show how, in light of a general dissatisfaction with the Stoic account of self articulated in his early work, Plotinus deals with the Stoic notion of oikeiōsis (‘appropriation’). I argue that Plotinus’ understanding of oikeiōsis develops across the period during which he uses it. In his middle writings, Plotinus engages with Stoic oikeiōsis by exploring how it functions in contexts related to selfhood. In his later writings, he shows, on the one hand, how the concept of oikeiōsis can be Platonized, such as to account for the relation of the self to the Good, and, on the other, how the Stoic understanding of oikeiōsis is untenable for many of the same reasons that he rejects the Stoic notion of the hēgemonikon . Ultimately, Plotinus thinks that Stoic understandings of the hēgemonikon and oikeiōsis are untenable because they lead to something that could be characterized as ‘selfishness’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hellenic Studies (JHS) is recognised internationally as one of the foremost periodicals in the field of classical scholarship. It contains articles on a wide variety of Hellenic topics including Greek language, literature, history and art and archaeology in the Ancient, Byzantine and Modern periods, as well as reviews of recent books of importance to Greek studies.
期刊最新文献
Alcaeus, Pittakos ‘son of “Hyrras”’, and the Lesbian aristocracy, or ‘How to do things with words’ (M.R.) CHRIST Xenophon and the Athenian Democracy: The Education of an Elite Citizenry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. x + 215. $29.99. 9781108797757. (S.) CONNELL (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. Pp. xvii + 355. £85. 9781107197732. (A.P.) JUDSON The Undeciphered Signs of Linear B: Interpretation and Scribal Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. xx + 352, illus. 50 figs, 21 tables. £90. 9781108494724. (E.) MACKIL and (N.) PAPAZARKADAS (eds) Greek Epigraphy and Religion: Papers in Memory of Sara B. Aleshire from the Second North American Congress of Greek and Latin Epigraphy. Leiden: Brill, 2021. Pp. xiv + 360. €120. 9789004442535
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1