Gonzalo Yáñez‐Morroni, Francisco Suárez, José F. Muñoz, Magdalena Sofía Lagos
{"title":"希拉拉河流域水文模拟。2. 用当代数据验证水文通量","authors":"Gonzalo Yáñez‐Morroni, Francisco Suárez, José F. Muñoz, Magdalena Sofía Lagos","doi":"10.1002/wat2.1696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A companion paper in this Special Issue reviewed the development of a hydrological model of the Silala River basin, using long‐term data (1969–1992) to determine the basin's water balance and plausible groundwater recharge scenarios. In the context of a remote river basin with limited in situ data, this article reviews the potential of in situ and remotely collected data, available for a relatively short period (2018–2019), to validate various aspects of the hydrological model performance. These include the spatiotemporal evolution of snow cover areal fraction (SCF), actual evapotranspiration (ET a ) in the basin's extensive alluvial deposits, and wetland ET a . The observed SCF dynamics are well represented by the model at annual and monthly timescales, with monthly mean simulated SCF biases between −5.6% and 8%. At daily timescales, the model successfully captures snowstorm occurrence, although there are limitations on snow spatial patterning. Simulated ET a over alluvial deposits agrees with in situ observations during periods of high ET a , although the simulated values underestimate site‐specific observations during low ET a periods, due to the presence of lateral subsurface flows. In the wetlands, satellite‐based ET a estimates follow the seasonal pattern of in situ observations, but with values ~50% higher than those determined from elevation‐corrected eddy‐covariance (EC) measurements. Nonetheless, this difference is within the expected precision of the remote sensing method. Although based on a limited period, the validation results are encouraging, and demonstrate the utility of satellite tools and limited period in situ data for watersheds with scarce long‐term data. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Hydrological Processes","PeriodicalId":23774,"journal":{"name":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrological modeling of the Silala River basin. 2. Validation of hydrological fluxes with contemporary data\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Yáñez‐Morroni, Francisco Suárez, José F. Muñoz, Magdalena Sofía Lagos\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wat2.1696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A companion paper in this Special Issue reviewed the development of a hydrological model of the Silala River basin, using long‐term data (1969–1992) to determine the basin's water balance and plausible groundwater recharge scenarios. In the context of a remote river basin with limited in situ data, this article reviews the potential of in situ and remotely collected data, available for a relatively short period (2018–2019), to validate various aspects of the hydrological model performance. These include the spatiotemporal evolution of snow cover areal fraction (SCF), actual evapotranspiration (ET a ) in the basin's extensive alluvial deposits, and wetland ET a . The observed SCF dynamics are well represented by the model at annual and monthly timescales, with monthly mean simulated SCF biases between −5.6% and 8%. At daily timescales, the model successfully captures snowstorm occurrence, although there are limitations on snow spatial patterning. Simulated ET a over alluvial deposits agrees with in situ observations during periods of high ET a , although the simulated values underestimate site‐specific observations during low ET a periods, due to the presence of lateral subsurface flows. In the wetlands, satellite‐based ET a estimates follow the seasonal pattern of in situ observations, but with values ~50% higher than those determined from elevation‐corrected eddy‐covariance (EC) measurements. Nonetheless, this difference is within the expected precision of the remote sensing method. Although based on a limited period, the validation results are encouraging, and demonstrate the utility of satellite tools and limited period in situ data for watersheds with scarce long‐term data. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Hydrological Processes\",\"PeriodicalId\":23774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1696\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1696","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hydrological modeling of the Silala River basin. 2. Validation of hydrological fluxes with contemporary data
Abstract A companion paper in this Special Issue reviewed the development of a hydrological model of the Silala River basin, using long‐term data (1969–1992) to determine the basin's water balance and plausible groundwater recharge scenarios. In the context of a remote river basin with limited in situ data, this article reviews the potential of in situ and remotely collected data, available for a relatively short period (2018–2019), to validate various aspects of the hydrological model performance. These include the spatiotemporal evolution of snow cover areal fraction (SCF), actual evapotranspiration (ET a ) in the basin's extensive alluvial deposits, and wetland ET a . The observed SCF dynamics are well represented by the model at annual and monthly timescales, with monthly mean simulated SCF biases between −5.6% and 8%. At daily timescales, the model successfully captures snowstorm occurrence, although there are limitations on snow spatial patterning. Simulated ET a over alluvial deposits agrees with in situ observations during periods of high ET a , although the simulated values underestimate site‐specific observations during low ET a periods, due to the presence of lateral subsurface flows. In the wetlands, satellite‐based ET a estimates follow the seasonal pattern of in situ observations, but with values ~50% higher than those determined from elevation‐corrected eddy‐covariance (EC) measurements. Nonetheless, this difference is within the expected precision of the remote sensing method. Although based on a limited period, the validation results are encouraging, and demonstrate the utility of satellite tools and limited period in situ data for watersheds with scarce long‐term data. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Hydrological Processes
期刊介绍:
The WIREs series is truly unique, blending the best aspects of encyclopedic reference works and review journals into a dynamic online format. These remarkable resources foster a research culture that transcends disciplinary boundaries, all while upholding the utmost scientific and presentation excellence. However, they go beyond traditional publications and are, in essence, ever-evolving databases of the latest cutting-edge reviews.