奥古斯丁说教策略中的修辞学与圣经。迈克尔·格洛瓦斯基追寻基督教成熟的叙事(书评)

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY RHETORICA-A JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1353/rht.2023.a900074
{"title":"奥古斯丁说教策略中的修辞学与圣经。迈克尔·格洛瓦斯基追寻基督教成熟的叙事(书评)","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/rht.2023.a900074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation by Michael Glowasky Rafał Toczko Michael Glowasky, Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation, Supplements to Vigilae Christianae: Texts and Studies of Early Christian Life and Language 166. Leiden, NL: Brill, 2021. 195 pp. ISBN 978-90-04-44668-7. Augustine's rhetoric is experiencing a new wave of scholarly interest. Michael Glowasky's PhD monographic thesis is among the growing number of explorations of Augustine's rhetorical practice, unique in focusing solely on Augustine the preacher. The introduction (1-29) first presents the reasons for selecting this subject and reflects on the problems of studying Augustine's sermons as a coherent corpus. Next, he proposes classifying them into three categories based on the audience's \"stages of spiritual maturation\" (15): catechumens, neophytes and the faithful. This is novel, as scholars usually discern between catechumens and others, because the rules of participation in liturgy differed between them. Glowasky corroborates his decision with passages from two sermons (353 and 392) in which Augustine makes a parallel between the age of innocence of the newly baptised and infants. Glowasky's division of audiences into three categories is crucial for the whole study, constituting the basis for the selection of material and the method of communicating findings. The grouping is simple and elegant. Closing the introduction, Glowasky outlines his method for approaching Augustine's use of rhetoric and scripture in these three groups. First, he redefines the classical concept of narratio, to apply it more broadly as a way of communication that may replace logical argument to \"communicate deeper meaning with more persuasive and emotive force\" (23). Glowasky assumes that Augustine drew here on a long Latin rhetorical tradition and made use of narratio in two senses. Firstly, narratio is the story God tells the faithful through creation, history and Scripture. Secondly, the Scripture was understood as the narratio of the sermons. Furthermore, he assumes Augustine used a different type of narratio addressing different groups, applying a forensic narratio addressing neophytes, a deliberative type addressing catechumens, and, preaching to the faithful, \"draws out more fully the dialectical quality of narratio.\" Chapter 2 (30-56) explores the notion of narratio more deeply, building on John O'Banion's controversial claim that, for Quintilian, narratio was [End Page 207] \"the orator's fundamental art\" (341) and was understood as a thought process and way of communicating rather than a part of speech.1 Glowasky believes that Augustine shared this tradition and hence saw narratio as \"a ready-made tool to be used to refer to the strategic ordering of temporal events in order to convey an author's particular meaning\" (36). Narratio could substitute logical argument and be more persuasive if ordered properly. Glowasky again turns to O'Banion and Kenneth Burke to explain that Augustine treated \"narratio primarily as a tool for interpreting Scripture\" (41) but, contrary to these two scholars, links this thinking with the prior rhetorical tradition. This tradition seemingly emphasised that narratio proved to be the best tool for conveying meaning. Augustine presented Scripture as a coherent and reliable narratio in De doctrina Christiana and employed it as the narratio of his sermons. Glowasky bases his thesis on O'Banion article on Quintilian. However, Quintilian says various things about narratio throughout his vast work—some contradictory. But the main difficulty is that nothing suggests that Augustine knew the Institutiones well. They were not used as manuals of rhetoric at that time, when teaching was dominated by De inventione and Rhetorica ad Herennium and many books drawing on them, authored by Marius Victorinus, Grillius and other rhetores latini minores. Chapter 3 (57-88) is dedicated to proving the thesis that Augustine's sermons for catechumens seek to persuade them to enter the Catholic Church as the only place where salvation is attainable (57). Glowasky observes how Augustine's technical advice concerning preaching to the catechumens from De catechizandis rudibus shares much with Cicero's view of narratio in judicial oratory. Augustine's two sample speeches from the same book focus on describing the character of the Church through narratio...","PeriodicalId":44027,"journal":{"name":"RHETORICA-A JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation by Michael Glowasky (review)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rht.2023.a900074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reviewed by: Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation by Michael Glowasky Rafał Toczko Michael Glowasky, Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation, Supplements to Vigilae Christianae: Texts and Studies of Early Christian Life and Language 166. Leiden, NL: Brill, 2021. 195 pp. ISBN 978-90-04-44668-7. Augustine's rhetoric is experiencing a new wave of scholarly interest. Michael Glowasky's PhD monographic thesis is among the growing number of explorations of Augustine's rhetorical practice, unique in focusing solely on Augustine the preacher. The introduction (1-29) first presents the reasons for selecting this subject and reflects on the problems of studying Augustine's sermons as a coherent corpus. Next, he proposes classifying them into three categories based on the audience's \\\"stages of spiritual maturation\\\" (15): catechumens, neophytes and the faithful. This is novel, as scholars usually discern between catechumens and others, because the rules of participation in liturgy differed between them. Glowasky corroborates his decision with passages from two sermons (353 and 392) in which Augustine makes a parallel between the age of innocence of the newly baptised and infants. Glowasky's division of audiences into three categories is crucial for the whole study, constituting the basis for the selection of material and the method of communicating findings. The grouping is simple and elegant. Closing the introduction, Glowasky outlines his method for approaching Augustine's use of rhetoric and scripture in these three groups. First, he redefines the classical concept of narratio, to apply it more broadly as a way of communication that may replace logical argument to \\\"communicate deeper meaning with more persuasive and emotive force\\\" (23). Glowasky assumes that Augustine drew here on a long Latin rhetorical tradition and made use of narratio in two senses. Firstly, narratio is the story God tells the faithful through creation, history and Scripture. Secondly, the Scripture was understood as the narratio of the sermons. Furthermore, he assumes Augustine used a different type of narratio addressing different groups, applying a forensic narratio addressing neophytes, a deliberative type addressing catechumens, and, preaching to the faithful, \\\"draws out more fully the dialectical quality of narratio.\\\" Chapter 2 (30-56) explores the notion of narratio more deeply, building on John O'Banion's controversial claim that, for Quintilian, narratio was [End Page 207] \\\"the orator's fundamental art\\\" (341) and was understood as a thought process and way of communicating rather than a part of speech.1 Glowasky believes that Augustine shared this tradition and hence saw narratio as \\\"a ready-made tool to be used to refer to the strategic ordering of temporal events in order to convey an author's particular meaning\\\" (36). Narratio could substitute logical argument and be more persuasive if ordered properly. Glowasky again turns to O'Banion and Kenneth Burke to explain that Augustine treated \\\"narratio primarily as a tool for interpreting Scripture\\\" (41) but, contrary to these two scholars, links this thinking with the prior rhetorical tradition. This tradition seemingly emphasised that narratio proved to be the best tool for conveying meaning. Augustine presented Scripture as a coherent and reliable narratio in De doctrina Christiana and employed it as the narratio of his sermons. Glowasky bases his thesis on O'Banion article on Quintilian. However, Quintilian says various things about narratio throughout his vast work—some contradictory. But the main difficulty is that nothing suggests that Augustine knew the Institutiones well. They were not used as manuals of rhetoric at that time, when teaching was dominated by De inventione and Rhetorica ad Herennium and many books drawing on them, authored by Marius Victorinus, Grillius and other rhetores latini minores. Chapter 3 (57-88) is dedicated to proving the thesis that Augustine's sermons for catechumens seek to persuade them to enter the Catholic Church as the only place where salvation is attainable (57). Glowasky observes how Augustine's technical advice concerning preaching to the catechumens from De catechizandis rudibus shares much with Cicero's view of narratio in judicial oratory. Augustine's two sample speeches from the same book focus on describing the character of the Church through narratio...\",\"PeriodicalId\":44027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RHETORICA-A JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RHETORICA-A JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2023.a900074\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RHETORICA-A JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF RHETORIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rht.2023.a900074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经:奥古斯丁说教策略中的修辞学与圣经。格洛瓦斯基:《奥古斯丁说教策略中的修辞与圣经》。追溯基督教成熟的叙事,《基督教义警补充:早期基督徒生活和语言的文本与研究》166。莱顿,NL: Brill, 2021。195页。ISBN 978-90-04-44668-7。奥古斯丁的修辞学正经历着新一轮的学术兴趣浪潮。迈克尔·格洛瓦斯基的博士论文是对奥古斯丁修辞实践的越来越多的探索之一,其独特之处在于只关注传教士奥古斯丁。引言(1-29)首先提出了选择这个主题的原因,并反映了研究奥古斯丁的讲道作为一个连贯的语料库的问题。接下来,他建议根据听众的“精神成熟阶段”(15)将他们分为三类:慕道者、新信徒和忠实信徒。这是很新奇的,因为学者们通常会区分慕道者和其他人,因为他们参与礼仪的规则不同。格洛瓦斯基用两篇布道(353和392)中的段落证实了他的决定,其中奥古斯丁将新受洗者的天真年龄与婴儿年龄进行了比较。格洛瓦斯基将受众分为三类,这对整个研究至关重要,它构成了材料选择和研究结果交流方法的基础。分组是简单而优雅的。在引言的最后,格洛瓦斯基概述了他在这三组中研究奥古斯丁使用修辞和经文的方法。首先,他重新定义了叙事的经典概念,将其更广泛地应用于一种交流方式,可以取代逻辑论证,“以更有说服力和情感力量传达更深的意义”(23)。格洛瓦斯基认为,奥古斯丁在这里借鉴了悠久的拉丁修辞传统,并在两种意义上使用了叙事。首先,叙事是上帝通过创造、历史和圣经告诉信徒的故事。其次,圣经被理解为布道的叙述。此外,他假设奥古斯丁对不同的群体使用了不同类型的叙述,对新手使用了法医式的叙述,对慕道者使用了深思式的叙述,对信徒讲道,“更充分地引出了叙述的辩证性质”第2章(30-56)更深入地探讨了叙事的概念,建立在约翰·奥班宁(John O'Banion)有争议的主张的基础上,即对昆提利安来说,叙事是“演说家的基本艺术”(341),被理解为一种思维过程和交流方式,而不是演讲的一部分格洛瓦斯基认为奥古斯丁分享了这一传统,因此将叙事视为“一种现成的工具,用于参考时间事件的战略性排序,以传达作者的特定含义”(36)。叙事可以代替逻辑论证,如果安排得当,叙事更有说服力。格洛瓦斯基再次求助于奥巴尼恩和肯尼斯·伯克来解释奥古斯丁将“叙事主要作为解释圣经的工具”(41),但与这两位学者相反,他将这种思想与先前的修辞传统联系起来。这一传统似乎强调,叙事被证明是传达意义的最佳工具。奥古斯丁在《论基督教教义》中将《圣经》描述为连贯可靠的叙述,并将其作为布道的叙述。格洛瓦斯基的论文是基于奥巴宁关于昆提连的文章。然而,昆提连在他的巨著中说了很多关于叙事的事情——有些是矛盾的。但主要的困难在于,没有任何证据表明奥古斯丁非常了解这些机构。它们并没有被用作修辞学手册,当时的教学主要是《论发明》和《修辞学与现代》,以及许多借鉴它们的书籍,这些书籍的作者是马里乌斯·维克多里努斯、格里留斯和其他修辞学辅修者。第3章(57-88)致力于证明奥古斯丁对慕道者的布道试图说服他们进入天主教会,因为这是唯一可以获得救赎的地方(57)。格洛瓦斯基观察到奥古斯丁关于向教理问答者讲道的技术建议《教理问答》与西塞罗在司法演讲中的叙事观点有很多相似之处。奥古斯丁在同一本书中的两篇演讲样本集中于通过叙述来描述教会的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation by Michael Glowasky (review)
Reviewed by: Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation by Michael Glowasky Rafał Toczko Michael Glowasky, Rhetoric and Scripture in Augustine's Homiletic Strategy. Tracing the Narrative of Christian Maturation, Supplements to Vigilae Christianae: Texts and Studies of Early Christian Life and Language 166. Leiden, NL: Brill, 2021. 195 pp. ISBN 978-90-04-44668-7. Augustine's rhetoric is experiencing a new wave of scholarly interest. Michael Glowasky's PhD monographic thesis is among the growing number of explorations of Augustine's rhetorical practice, unique in focusing solely on Augustine the preacher. The introduction (1-29) first presents the reasons for selecting this subject and reflects on the problems of studying Augustine's sermons as a coherent corpus. Next, he proposes classifying them into three categories based on the audience's "stages of spiritual maturation" (15): catechumens, neophytes and the faithful. This is novel, as scholars usually discern between catechumens and others, because the rules of participation in liturgy differed between them. Glowasky corroborates his decision with passages from two sermons (353 and 392) in which Augustine makes a parallel between the age of innocence of the newly baptised and infants. Glowasky's division of audiences into three categories is crucial for the whole study, constituting the basis for the selection of material and the method of communicating findings. The grouping is simple and elegant. Closing the introduction, Glowasky outlines his method for approaching Augustine's use of rhetoric and scripture in these three groups. First, he redefines the classical concept of narratio, to apply it more broadly as a way of communication that may replace logical argument to "communicate deeper meaning with more persuasive and emotive force" (23). Glowasky assumes that Augustine drew here on a long Latin rhetorical tradition and made use of narratio in two senses. Firstly, narratio is the story God tells the faithful through creation, history and Scripture. Secondly, the Scripture was understood as the narratio of the sermons. Furthermore, he assumes Augustine used a different type of narratio addressing different groups, applying a forensic narratio addressing neophytes, a deliberative type addressing catechumens, and, preaching to the faithful, "draws out more fully the dialectical quality of narratio." Chapter 2 (30-56) explores the notion of narratio more deeply, building on John O'Banion's controversial claim that, for Quintilian, narratio was [End Page 207] "the orator's fundamental art" (341) and was understood as a thought process and way of communicating rather than a part of speech.1 Glowasky believes that Augustine shared this tradition and hence saw narratio as "a ready-made tool to be used to refer to the strategic ordering of temporal events in order to convey an author's particular meaning" (36). Narratio could substitute logical argument and be more persuasive if ordered properly. Glowasky again turns to O'Banion and Kenneth Burke to explain that Augustine treated "narratio primarily as a tool for interpreting Scripture" (41) but, contrary to these two scholars, links this thinking with the prior rhetorical tradition. This tradition seemingly emphasised that narratio proved to be the best tool for conveying meaning. Augustine presented Scripture as a coherent and reliable narratio in De doctrina Christiana and employed it as the narratio of his sermons. Glowasky bases his thesis on O'Banion article on Quintilian. However, Quintilian says various things about narratio throughout his vast work—some contradictory. But the main difficulty is that nothing suggests that Augustine knew the Institutiones well. They were not used as manuals of rhetoric at that time, when teaching was dominated by De inventione and Rhetorica ad Herennium and many books drawing on them, authored by Marius Victorinus, Grillius and other rhetores latini minores. Chapter 3 (57-88) is dedicated to proving the thesis that Augustine's sermons for catechumens seek to persuade them to enter the Catholic Church as the only place where salvation is attainable (57). Glowasky observes how Augustine's technical advice concerning preaching to the catechumens from De catechizandis rudibus shares much with Cicero's view of narratio in judicial oratory. Augustine's two sample speeches from the same book focus on describing the character of the Church through narratio...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Language holds a dual identity: it is both an art as well as a science, with each word expressing a unique meaning. And when words are arranged with specific purpose to persuade, or to communicate ideologies, language acquires yet another facet of identity--that of rhetoric. Rhetorica, published quarterly for the International Society for the History of Rhetoric, includes articles, book reviews and bibliographies that examine the theory and practice of rhetoric in all periods and languages and their relationship with poetics, philosophy, religion and law. The official languages of the Society, and of the journal, are English, French, German, Italian, Latin, and Spanish, with articles and features corresponding.
期刊最新文献
La Dialectique en François pour les barbiers et les chirurgiens (1553) d'Adrien L'Alemant: Première dialectique médicale en français Addresses of Contributors A Religious Polemic in Galenic Garb? Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq's (d. 260/873) Kitāb al-Karma ( On Vines ) and his Encomium of Wine Rhetoric and Medicine: Introduction Médecine et humanisme en Périgord: L'invention de la langue française selon Ervé Fayard ( Galen sur la faculté dez simples medicamans , 1548)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1