调查卫生保健工作者在南非推广COVID-19疫苗的意愿:明确证据基础的重要性

Gavin George, Phiwe B. Nota, Michael Strauss, Emma Lansdell, Remco P.H. Peters, Petra Brysiewicz, Nisha Nadesan-Reddy, Douglas Wassenaar
{"title":"调查卫生保健工作者在南非推广COVID-19疫苗的意愿:明确证据基础的重要性","authors":"Gavin George, Phiwe B. Nota, Michael Strauss, Emma Lansdell, Remco P.H. Peters, Petra Brysiewicz, Nisha Nadesan-Reddy, Douglas Wassenaar","doi":"10.61473/001c.75321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Studies have shown that healthcare workers (HCWs) are considered trusted sources of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) information in their communities, ideally placing them as effective vaccine advocates. However, limited data exist on the role of HCWs in the promotion of vaccines, and whether they feel adequately equipped to fulfil this role. This study therefore aimed to determine the willingness of HCWs in promoting COVID-19 vaccines, how this correlated with their own vaccination behaviour and attitudes to alternative therapies, and whether they felt they had adequate knowledge and skills to communicate effectively with patients. Methods A mixed-methods design was adopted, involving an online web-based survey and in-depth interviews (IDIs). HCWs were recruited for the online survey from an integrated health system database in South Africa using voluntary response sampling, with follow-up qualitative interviews conducted with HCWs who indicated interest in participating in an interview. Univariate and multivariate logistical regression models were used to understand how demographic characteristics, HCW roles, vaccination status, attitudes and practices around alternative medications, and information on COVID-19 vaccines were related to the willingness of HCWs to recommend vaccination to their patients. Results Most of the survey sample were vaccinated (90.7%) and indicated that they would recommend vaccination (81.7%). However, a significant proportion of the sample (58.6%) felt that they did not have enough information on COVID-19 vaccines, while 59.8% felt that they required additional guidance on how to educate their patients on COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccinated HCWs were more likely to recommend vaccination (OR=10.63 [95% CI: 6.53-17.31]) than their unvaccinated counterparts. The qualitative results provide further insights into why HCWs were willing or unwilling to administer and promote vaccines, with three themes emerging: (i) HCWs’ belief in the value of vaccines and their promotion strategies; (ii) challenges facing HCWs in fulfilling their mandate of administering and promoting COVID-19 vaccination; and (iii) the rationale for HCWs discouraging vaccination and promoting alternative medicines for COVID-19 prevention and treatment. Conclusions This study posits that if HCWs are key to the success of national vaccination programmes, then they will need to be provided with clear, contextual, up-to-date information in order to enhance patient communication and vaccine uptake.","PeriodicalId":21814,"journal":{"name":"South African Health Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining healthcare worker willingness to promote COVID-19 vaccines in South Africa: the importance of a clear evidence base\",\"authors\":\"Gavin George, Phiwe B. Nota, Michael Strauss, Emma Lansdell, Remco P.H. Peters, Petra Brysiewicz, Nisha Nadesan-Reddy, Douglas Wassenaar\",\"doi\":\"10.61473/001c.75321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Studies have shown that healthcare workers (HCWs) are considered trusted sources of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) information in their communities, ideally placing them as effective vaccine advocates. However, limited data exist on the role of HCWs in the promotion of vaccines, and whether they feel adequately equipped to fulfil this role. This study therefore aimed to determine the willingness of HCWs in promoting COVID-19 vaccines, how this correlated with their own vaccination behaviour and attitudes to alternative therapies, and whether they felt they had adequate knowledge and skills to communicate effectively with patients. Methods A mixed-methods design was adopted, involving an online web-based survey and in-depth interviews (IDIs). HCWs were recruited for the online survey from an integrated health system database in South Africa using voluntary response sampling, with follow-up qualitative interviews conducted with HCWs who indicated interest in participating in an interview. Univariate and multivariate logistical regression models were used to understand how demographic characteristics, HCW roles, vaccination status, attitudes and practices around alternative medications, and information on COVID-19 vaccines were related to the willingness of HCWs to recommend vaccination to their patients. Results Most of the survey sample were vaccinated (90.7%) and indicated that they would recommend vaccination (81.7%). However, a significant proportion of the sample (58.6%) felt that they did not have enough information on COVID-19 vaccines, while 59.8% felt that they required additional guidance on how to educate their patients on COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccinated HCWs were more likely to recommend vaccination (OR=10.63 [95% CI: 6.53-17.31]) than their unvaccinated counterparts. The qualitative results provide further insights into why HCWs were willing or unwilling to administer and promote vaccines, with three themes emerging: (i) HCWs’ belief in the value of vaccines and their promotion strategies; (ii) challenges facing HCWs in fulfilling their mandate of administering and promoting COVID-19 vaccination; and (iii) the rationale for HCWs discouraging vaccination and promoting alternative medicines for COVID-19 prevention and treatment. Conclusions This study posits that if HCWs are key to the success of national vaccination programmes, then they will need to be provided with clear, contextual, up-to-date information in order to enhance patient communication and vaccine uptake.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Health Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Health Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61473/001c.75321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61473/001c.75321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,在社区中,医护人员被认为是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)信息的可靠来源,理想情况下,他们被视为有效的疫苗倡导者。然而,关于卫生保健工作人员在推广疫苗方面的作用以及他们是否认为自己有充分的能力履行这一作用的数据有限。因此,本研究旨在确定医护人员推广COVID-19疫苗的意愿,这与他们自己的疫苗接种行为和对替代疗法的态度之间的关系,以及他们是否认为自己有足够的知识和技能与患者进行有效沟通。方法采用基于网络的在线调查与深度访谈相结合的混合方法设计。通过自愿回应抽样,从南非的综合卫生系统数据库中招募卫生保健工作者参与在线调查,并对表示有兴趣参加访谈的卫生保健工作者进行了后续定性访谈。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型来了解人口统计学特征、医护人员的角色、疫苗接种状况、替代药物的态度和做法以及COVID-19疫苗信息与医护人员向患者推荐疫苗接种意愿的关系。结果绝大多数调查对象(90.7%)接种过疫苗,并表示会推荐接种(81.7%)。然而,很大一部分样本(58.6%)认为他们没有足够的COVID-19疫苗信息,而59.8%的人认为他们需要额外的指导来教育他们的患者COVID-19疫苗。与未接种疫苗的医护人员相比,接种疫苗的医护人员更倾向于推荐接种疫苗(OR=10.63 [95% CI: 6.53-17.31])。定性结果为卫生保健工作者愿意或不愿意管理和推广疫苗的原因提供了进一步的见解,其中出现了三个主题:(i)卫生保健工作者对疫苗价值的信念及其推广战略;(ii)卫生保健员在履行管理和推广COVID-19疫苗接种任务方面面临的挑战;(三)卫生保健工作者不鼓励接种疫苗并推广替代药物预防和治疗COVID-19的理由。本研究认为,如果卫生保健工作者是国家疫苗接种规划成功的关键,那么就需要向他们提供明确的、背景的、最新的信息,以加强患者沟通和疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining healthcare worker willingness to promote COVID-19 vaccines in South Africa: the importance of a clear evidence base
Background Studies have shown that healthcare workers (HCWs) are considered trusted sources of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) information in their communities, ideally placing them as effective vaccine advocates. However, limited data exist on the role of HCWs in the promotion of vaccines, and whether they feel adequately equipped to fulfil this role. This study therefore aimed to determine the willingness of HCWs in promoting COVID-19 vaccines, how this correlated with their own vaccination behaviour and attitudes to alternative therapies, and whether they felt they had adequate knowledge and skills to communicate effectively with patients. Methods A mixed-methods design was adopted, involving an online web-based survey and in-depth interviews (IDIs). HCWs were recruited for the online survey from an integrated health system database in South Africa using voluntary response sampling, with follow-up qualitative interviews conducted with HCWs who indicated interest in participating in an interview. Univariate and multivariate logistical regression models were used to understand how demographic characteristics, HCW roles, vaccination status, attitudes and practices around alternative medications, and information on COVID-19 vaccines were related to the willingness of HCWs to recommend vaccination to their patients. Results Most of the survey sample were vaccinated (90.7%) and indicated that they would recommend vaccination (81.7%). However, a significant proportion of the sample (58.6%) felt that they did not have enough information on COVID-19 vaccines, while 59.8% felt that they required additional guidance on how to educate their patients on COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccinated HCWs were more likely to recommend vaccination (OR=10.63 [95% CI: 6.53-17.31]) than their unvaccinated counterparts. The qualitative results provide further insights into why HCWs were willing or unwilling to administer and promote vaccines, with three themes emerging: (i) HCWs’ belief in the value of vaccines and their promotion strategies; (ii) challenges facing HCWs in fulfilling their mandate of administering and promoting COVID-19 vaccination; and (iii) the rationale for HCWs discouraging vaccination and promoting alternative medicines for COVID-19 prevention and treatment. Conclusions This study posits that if HCWs are key to the success of national vaccination programmes, then they will need to be provided with clear, contextual, up-to-date information in order to enhance patient communication and vaccine uptake.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health and related indicators 2022 Health committee participation in South Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic: a shifting picture Gender differences in mental health outcomes during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in South Africa The ‘just transition’ and health in South Africa ‘Following the science’: the role of an independent advisory structure in the COVID-19 pandemic response and beyond
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1