单纯活检不可切除的IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤放化疗的可行性

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1093/nop/npad028
Vincent Harlay, Romain Appay, Céline Bequet, Gregorio Petrirena, Chantal Campello, Maryline Barrié, Didier Autran, Thomas Graillon, Sébastien Boissonneau, Henry Dufour, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Laetitia Padovani, Anne Barlier, Isabelle Nanni, Emeline Tabouret, Olivier Chinot
{"title":"单纯活检不可切除的IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤放化疗的可行性","authors":"Vincent Harlay, Romain Appay, Céline Bequet, Gregorio Petrirena, Chantal Campello, Maryline Barrié, Didier Autran, Thomas Graillon, Sébastien Boissonneau, Henry Dufour, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Laetitia Padovani, Anne Barlier, Isabelle Nanni, Emeline Tabouret, Olivier Chinot","doi":"10.1093/nop/npad028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Abstract Background “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma (BO-GBM) is a heterogeneous, understudied group of patients associated with a poor outcome. Our objective was to explore the pattern of care and prognosis associated with BO-GBM in our center. Methods Patients with IDH wild-type BO-GBM included in a prospective regional cohort initiated in 2014 and closed in 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, MRI findings, treatment allocation, and delivery. Results Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 137 patients were included in the present analysis. The median age was 66 years old and the median KPS was 70. Forty-six patients (33.6%) were referred to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT–TMZ) regimen, 75 (54.7%), considered unfitted for RT, received chemotherapy upfront (CT) and 16 (11.7%) were referred to palliative care (PC). Regarding the first group, 91% of patients completed the RT–TMZ. In the CT group, 11 of 75 patients (14.7%) underwent radiotherapy after chemotherapy upfront. Median overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 15.30–24.16), 5.7 months (95% CI, 6.22–9.20), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.43–5.08) in RT–TMZ, CT, and PC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, progression-free survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &amp;lt; .001) and MGMT status (P = .004). Overall survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &amp;lt; .001) and age (P = .030). Conclusion BO-GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one-third of patients is amenable to the standard of care, with survival outcome close to one of the patients who underwent surgery. Reliable criteria are needed to help select patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radio-chemotherapy feasibility for biopsy-only unresectable <i>IDH</i> wild-type glioblastomas (BO-GBM)\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Harlay, Romain Appay, Céline Bequet, Gregorio Petrirena, Chantal Campello, Maryline Barrié, Didier Autran, Thomas Graillon, Sébastien Boissonneau, Henry Dufour, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Laetitia Padovani, Anne Barlier, Isabelle Nanni, Emeline Tabouret, Olivier Chinot\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npad028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Abstract Background “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma (BO-GBM) is a heterogeneous, understudied group of patients associated with a poor outcome. Our objective was to explore the pattern of care and prognosis associated with BO-GBM in our center. Methods Patients with IDH wild-type BO-GBM included in a prospective regional cohort initiated in 2014 and closed in 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, MRI findings, treatment allocation, and delivery. Results Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 137 patients were included in the present analysis. The median age was 66 years old and the median KPS was 70. Forty-six patients (33.6%) were referred to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT–TMZ) regimen, 75 (54.7%), considered unfitted for RT, received chemotherapy upfront (CT) and 16 (11.7%) were referred to palliative care (PC). Regarding the first group, 91% of patients completed the RT–TMZ. In the CT group, 11 of 75 patients (14.7%) underwent radiotherapy after chemotherapy upfront. Median overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 15.30–24.16), 5.7 months (95% CI, 6.22–9.20), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.43–5.08) in RT–TMZ, CT, and PC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, progression-free survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &amp;lt; .001) and MGMT status (P = .004). Overall survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &amp;lt; .001) and age (P = .030). Conclusion BO-GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one-third of patients is amenable to the standard of care, with survival outcome close to one of the patients who underwent surgery. Reliable criteria are needed to help select patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景“仅活组织检查”胶质母细胞瘤(BO-GBM)是一种异质性的、研究不足的患者群体,其预后较差。我们的目的是探讨本中心与BO-GBM相关的护理模式和预后。方法回顾性分析2014年开始并于2017年结束的前瞻性区域队列中IDH野生型BO-GBM患者的患者特征、MRI表现、治疗分配和递送。结果在纳入队列的535例患者中,137例患者被纳入本分析。平均年龄为66岁,平均KPS为70岁。46例(33.6%)患者转入放化疗(RT - tmz)方案,75例(54.7%)患者认为不适合RT,接受化疗(CT), 16例(11.7%)患者转入姑息治疗(PC)。第一组91%的患者完成了RT-TMZ。在CT组,75例患者中有11例(14.7%)在化疗后进行了前期放疗。RT-TMZ、CT和PC组的中位总生存期分别为12.3个月(95% CI, 15.30-24.16)、5.7个月(95% CI, 6.22-9.20)和1.9个月(95% CI, 1.43-5.08)。在多变量分析中,无进展生存期受到基线KPS (P <.001)和MGMT状态(P = .004)。总生存期受基线KPS (P <.001)和年龄(P = .030)。结论BO-GBM是一个庞大且异质性的人群,其中三分之一的患者可以接受标准治疗,其生存结局接近于接受手术的患者之一。需要可靠的标准来帮助选择适当治疗的患者,而对于不适合RT的BO-GBM则需要新的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radio-chemotherapy feasibility for biopsy-only unresectable IDH wild-type glioblastomas (BO-GBM)
Abstract Abstract Background “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma (BO-GBM) is a heterogeneous, understudied group of patients associated with a poor outcome. Our objective was to explore the pattern of care and prognosis associated with BO-GBM in our center. Methods Patients with IDH wild-type BO-GBM included in a prospective regional cohort initiated in 2014 and closed in 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, MRI findings, treatment allocation, and delivery. Results Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 137 patients were included in the present analysis. The median age was 66 years old and the median KPS was 70. Forty-six patients (33.6%) were referred to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT–TMZ) regimen, 75 (54.7%), considered unfitted for RT, received chemotherapy upfront (CT) and 16 (11.7%) were referred to palliative care (PC). Regarding the first group, 91% of patients completed the RT–TMZ. In the CT group, 11 of 75 patients (14.7%) underwent radiotherapy after chemotherapy upfront. Median overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 15.30–24.16), 5.7 months (95% CI, 6.22–9.20), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.43–5.08) in RT–TMZ, CT, and PC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, progression-free survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &lt; .001) and MGMT status (P = .004). Overall survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &lt; .001) and age (P = .030). Conclusion BO-GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one-third of patients is amenable to the standard of care, with survival outcome close to one of the patients who underwent surgery. Reliable criteria are needed to help select patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
期刊最新文献
Erratum to: Glioma resource outreach with support: A program to identify and initiate supportive care interventions for unmet needs among adult lower-grade glioma patients. Well-intentioned is not always beneficial: Why we should question prescription habits. Long-term effects on fertility after central nervous system cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Socioeconomic driven disparities in neuro-oncology. Palliative care services in neuro-oncology: Mind the gap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1