Vincent Harlay, Romain Appay, Céline Bequet, Gregorio Petrirena, Chantal Campello, Maryline Barrié, Didier Autran, Thomas Graillon, Sébastien Boissonneau, Henry Dufour, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Laetitia Padovani, Anne Barlier, Isabelle Nanni, Emeline Tabouret, Olivier Chinot
{"title":"单纯活检不可切除的IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤放化疗的可行性","authors":"Vincent Harlay, Romain Appay, Céline Bequet, Gregorio Petrirena, Chantal Campello, Maryline Barrié, Didier Autran, Thomas Graillon, Sébastien Boissonneau, Henry Dufour, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Laetitia Padovani, Anne Barlier, Isabelle Nanni, Emeline Tabouret, Olivier Chinot","doi":"10.1093/nop/npad028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Abstract Background “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma (BO-GBM) is a heterogeneous, understudied group of patients associated with a poor outcome. Our objective was to explore the pattern of care and prognosis associated with BO-GBM in our center. Methods Patients with IDH wild-type BO-GBM included in a prospective regional cohort initiated in 2014 and closed in 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, MRI findings, treatment allocation, and delivery. Results Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 137 patients were included in the present analysis. The median age was 66 years old and the median KPS was 70. Forty-six patients (33.6%) were referred to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT–TMZ) regimen, 75 (54.7%), considered unfitted for RT, received chemotherapy upfront (CT) and 16 (11.7%) were referred to palliative care (PC). Regarding the first group, 91% of patients completed the RT–TMZ. In the CT group, 11 of 75 patients (14.7%) underwent radiotherapy after chemotherapy upfront. Median overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 15.30–24.16), 5.7 months (95% CI, 6.22–9.20), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.43–5.08) in RT–TMZ, CT, and PC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, progression-free survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &lt; .001) and MGMT status (P = .004). Overall survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &lt; .001) and age (P = .030). Conclusion BO-GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one-third of patients is amenable to the standard of care, with survival outcome close to one of the patients who underwent surgery. Reliable criteria are needed to help select patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radio-chemotherapy feasibility for biopsy-only unresectable <i>IDH</i> wild-type glioblastomas (BO-GBM)\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Harlay, Romain Appay, Céline Bequet, Gregorio Petrirena, Chantal Campello, Maryline Barrié, Didier Autran, Thomas Graillon, Sébastien Boissonneau, Henry Dufour, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Laetitia Padovani, Anne Barlier, Isabelle Nanni, Emeline Tabouret, Olivier Chinot\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npad028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Abstract Background “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma (BO-GBM) is a heterogeneous, understudied group of patients associated with a poor outcome. Our objective was to explore the pattern of care and prognosis associated with BO-GBM in our center. Methods Patients with IDH wild-type BO-GBM included in a prospective regional cohort initiated in 2014 and closed in 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, MRI findings, treatment allocation, and delivery. Results Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 137 patients were included in the present analysis. The median age was 66 years old and the median KPS was 70. Forty-six patients (33.6%) were referred to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT–TMZ) regimen, 75 (54.7%), considered unfitted for RT, received chemotherapy upfront (CT) and 16 (11.7%) were referred to palliative care (PC). Regarding the first group, 91% of patients completed the RT–TMZ. In the CT group, 11 of 75 patients (14.7%) underwent radiotherapy after chemotherapy upfront. Median overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 15.30–24.16), 5.7 months (95% CI, 6.22–9.20), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.43–5.08) in RT–TMZ, CT, and PC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, progression-free survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &lt; .001) and MGMT status (P = .004). Overall survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P &lt; .001) and age (P = .030). Conclusion BO-GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one-third of patients is amenable to the standard of care, with survival outcome close to one of the patients who underwent surgery. Reliable criteria are needed to help select patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Radio-chemotherapy feasibility for biopsy-only unresectable IDH wild-type glioblastomas (BO-GBM)
Abstract Abstract Background “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma (BO-GBM) is a heterogeneous, understudied group of patients associated with a poor outcome. Our objective was to explore the pattern of care and prognosis associated with BO-GBM in our center. Methods Patients with IDH wild-type BO-GBM included in a prospective regional cohort initiated in 2014 and closed in 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, MRI findings, treatment allocation, and delivery. Results Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 137 patients were included in the present analysis. The median age was 66 years old and the median KPS was 70. Forty-six patients (33.6%) were referred to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (RT–TMZ) regimen, 75 (54.7%), considered unfitted for RT, received chemotherapy upfront (CT) and 16 (11.7%) were referred to palliative care (PC). Regarding the first group, 91% of patients completed the RT–TMZ. In the CT group, 11 of 75 patients (14.7%) underwent radiotherapy after chemotherapy upfront. Median overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI, 15.30–24.16), 5.7 months (95% CI, 6.22–9.20), and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.43–5.08) in RT–TMZ, CT, and PC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses, progression-free survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P < .001) and MGMT status (P = .004). Overall survival was impacted by baseline KPS (P < .001) and age (P = .030). Conclusion BO-GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one-third of patients is amenable to the standard of care, with survival outcome close to one of the patients who underwent surgery. Reliable criteria are needed to help select patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.
期刊介绍:
Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving