多准则决策方法在菜单选择中的应用

Semih Latif İPEK, Dilek GÖKTÜRK
{"title":"多准则决策方法在菜单选择中的应用","authors":"Semih Latif İPEK, Dilek GÖKTÜRK","doi":"10.34248/bsengineering.1358895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nutritional information on menus can assist customers in making healthier eating choices. One technique being utilized to tackle the rise of overweight and obesity is the use of nutritional information on menus. Menu engineering strategies can be used to improve sales of generally healthier and higher margin items. For today's food and beverage companies, menu engineering has become essential. Companies must continually evaluate their menus in order to keep up with changing customer demands and the conditions of the competitive market. Menu engineering's core involves comparing the effectiveness of each menu. At this point, correct decision-making under numerous factors is thought to be a very challenging procedure. To evaluate alternatives according to many features, several Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approaches have been created. In this study, four MCDM methods, including Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Fuzzy TOPSIS, VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), and Fuzzy VIKOR are employed to evaluate menu options. The process of evaluating and selecting healthier menu alternatives can become challenging and time-consuming. This study pointed out how crucial it is to conduct comparative analysis using various MCDA methods and to carefully determine the right ones when addressing the issue of selecting the best menu, taking into account the values of the criterion in fuzzy numbers.","PeriodicalId":495872,"journal":{"name":"Black sea journal of engineering and science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Menu Selection\",\"authors\":\"Semih Latif İPEK, Dilek GÖKTÜRK\",\"doi\":\"10.34248/bsengineering.1358895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nutritional information on menus can assist customers in making healthier eating choices. One technique being utilized to tackle the rise of overweight and obesity is the use of nutritional information on menus. Menu engineering strategies can be used to improve sales of generally healthier and higher margin items. For today's food and beverage companies, menu engineering has become essential. Companies must continually evaluate their menus in order to keep up with changing customer demands and the conditions of the competitive market. Menu engineering's core involves comparing the effectiveness of each menu. At this point, correct decision-making under numerous factors is thought to be a very challenging procedure. To evaluate alternatives according to many features, several Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approaches have been created. In this study, four MCDM methods, including Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Fuzzy TOPSIS, VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), and Fuzzy VIKOR are employed to evaluate menu options. The process of evaluating and selecting healthier menu alternatives can become challenging and time-consuming. This study pointed out how crucial it is to conduct comparative analysis using various MCDA methods and to carefully determine the right ones when addressing the issue of selecting the best menu, taking into account the values of the criterion in fuzzy numbers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":495872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Black sea journal of engineering and science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Black sea journal of engineering and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1358895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black sea journal of engineering and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1358895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

菜单上的营养信息可以帮助顾客做出更健康的饮食选择。一种用来解决超重和肥胖问题的技术是在菜单上使用营养信息。菜单工程策略可以用来提高一般健康和高利润项目的销售。对于今天的食品和饮料公司来说,菜单工程已经变得至关重要。公司必须不断地评估他们的菜单,以跟上不断变化的顾客需求和竞争激烈的市场条件。菜单工程的核心是比较每个菜单的有效性。在这一点上,在众多因素下的正确决策被认为是一个非常具有挑战性的过程。为了根据多种特征对备选方案进行评估,人们创建了几种多准则决策方法。本研究采用四种MCDM方法,包括TOPSIS (technical for Order Preference by Similarity to a Ideal Solution)、Fuzzy TOPSIS、VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)和Fuzzy VIKOR来评估菜单选项。评估和选择更健康的菜单替代品的过程可能变得具有挑战性和耗时。该研究指出,在解决选择最佳菜单的问题时,考虑到模糊数标准的值,使用各种MCDA方法进行比较分析并仔细确定正确的方法是多么重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Menu Selection
Nutritional information on menus can assist customers in making healthier eating choices. One technique being utilized to tackle the rise of overweight and obesity is the use of nutritional information on menus. Menu engineering strategies can be used to improve sales of generally healthier and higher margin items. For today's food and beverage companies, menu engineering has become essential. Companies must continually evaluate their menus in order to keep up with changing customer demands and the conditions of the competitive market. Menu engineering's core involves comparing the effectiveness of each menu. At this point, correct decision-making under numerous factors is thought to be a very challenging procedure. To evaluate alternatives according to many features, several Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approaches have been created. In this study, four MCDM methods, including Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Fuzzy TOPSIS, VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), and Fuzzy VIKOR are employed to evaluate menu options. The process of evaluating and selecting healthier menu alternatives can become challenging and time-consuming. This study pointed out how crucial it is to conduct comparative analysis using various MCDA methods and to carefully determine the right ones when addressing the issue of selecting the best menu, taking into account the values of the criterion in fuzzy numbers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Resource Allocation in the Black Sea TR83 Area of Türkiye: Advancing towards an Industrial Circular Economy Parametric Optimization of Structural Frame Design for High Payload Hexacopter Improving Lead Time through Lean Manufacturing: A Case Study Süt Sığırcılığı İşletmelerinde İşletme içi Kirlilik ve Topallık Skoru ile Süt Verimi Arasındaki İlişki Rotary Wing UAV Modeling and Control: A Design Application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1