树坚果和花生过敏在葡萄牙儿科队列-临床特征和过敏反应预测

Leonor Esteves Caldeira
{"title":"树坚果和花生过敏在葡萄牙儿科队列-临床特征和过敏反应预测","authors":"Leonor Esteves Caldeira","doi":"10.32474/papn.2023.04.000193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Tree nuts and peanuts (TN/P) are frequent causes of anaphylaxis in children. Aim: to characterize a Portuguese pediatric cohort with TN/P allergy and to assess skin tests (ST), specific IgE (sIgE) and molecular components (mcIgE), as well as sIgE/total IgE ratio’s utility in anaphylaxis prediction. Methods: Retrospective study (2017-2021) of pediatric patients with TN/P allergy, grouped according to reaction severity (anaphylaxis–G1 vs milder reaction–G2). ST mean papule diameter (MPD), sIgE (ImmunoCAP ® ), mcIgE (ISAC ® ) and sIgE/total IgE ratio were compared (SPSS ® , p < 0.05: statistically significant). Results: 98 patients, 64% male, 88% concomitant allergic disorder, 40% allergy family history. Major culprit nuts: peanut (63%), hazelnut (59%) and walnut (53%). Index reaction manifestations were mostly cutaneous (46%), followed by anaphylaxis (36%). Chestnut and cashew sensitizations were significantly associated with anaphylaxis (OR=5.023, p=0.002; OR=2.901, p=0.018). MPD was higher in G1 for almond, cashew and pistachio (p < 0.05). sIgE was not a good severity predictor for any TN/P, however, a significantly higher value of sIgE/total IgE ratio was found in G1 for walnut (p=0.023). mcIgE was obtained in 49%: peanut Ara h2 and Ara h6 were more represented in G1 (2.8 vs 0 ISU-E, p=0.042; 1.3 vs 0 ISU-E, p=0.020). Conclusion: Peanut, hazelnut and walnut were the most frequent nuts. Anaphylaxis was the first manifestation in 36%, significantly higher in chestnut and cashew allergic children. MPD should be valued not only for diagnosis, but also for anaphylaxis risk prediction in almond, cashew and pistachio allergic patients. sIgE/total IgE ratio seems to be useful in anaphylaxis prediction.","PeriodicalId":500873,"journal":{"name":"Progressing aspects in pediatrics and neonatology","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy in a Portuguese Pediatric Cohort- Clinical Characterization and Anaphylaxis PredictorsLeonor Esteves\",\"authors\":\"Leonor Esteves Caldeira\",\"doi\":\"10.32474/papn.2023.04.000193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Tree nuts and peanuts (TN/P) are frequent causes of anaphylaxis in children. Aim: to characterize a Portuguese pediatric cohort with TN/P allergy and to assess skin tests (ST), specific IgE (sIgE) and molecular components (mcIgE), as well as sIgE/total IgE ratio’s utility in anaphylaxis prediction. Methods: Retrospective study (2017-2021) of pediatric patients with TN/P allergy, grouped according to reaction severity (anaphylaxis–G1 vs milder reaction–G2). ST mean papule diameter (MPD), sIgE (ImmunoCAP ® ), mcIgE (ISAC ® ) and sIgE/total IgE ratio were compared (SPSS ® , p < 0.05: statistically significant). Results: 98 patients, 64% male, 88% concomitant allergic disorder, 40% allergy family history. Major culprit nuts: peanut (63%), hazelnut (59%) and walnut (53%). Index reaction manifestations were mostly cutaneous (46%), followed by anaphylaxis (36%). Chestnut and cashew sensitizations were significantly associated with anaphylaxis (OR=5.023, p=0.002; OR=2.901, p=0.018). MPD was higher in G1 for almond, cashew and pistachio (p < 0.05). sIgE was not a good severity predictor for any TN/P, however, a significantly higher value of sIgE/total IgE ratio was found in G1 for walnut (p=0.023). mcIgE was obtained in 49%: peanut Ara h2 and Ara h6 were more represented in G1 (2.8 vs 0 ISU-E, p=0.042; 1.3 vs 0 ISU-E, p=0.020). Conclusion: Peanut, hazelnut and walnut were the most frequent nuts. Anaphylaxis was the first manifestation in 36%, significantly higher in chestnut and cashew allergic children. MPD should be valued not only for diagnosis, but also for anaphylaxis risk prediction in almond, cashew and pistachio allergic patients. sIgE/total IgE ratio seems to be useful in anaphylaxis prediction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progressing aspects in pediatrics and neonatology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progressing aspects in pediatrics and neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32474/papn.2023.04.000193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progressing aspects in pediatrics and neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32474/papn.2023.04.000193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy in a Portuguese Pediatric Cohort- Clinical Characterization and Anaphylaxis PredictorsLeonor Esteves
Background: Tree nuts and peanuts (TN/P) are frequent causes of anaphylaxis in children. Aim: to characterize a Portuguese pediatric cohort with TN/P allergy and to assess skin tests (ST), specific IgE (sIgE) and molecular components (mcIgE), as well as sIgE/total IgE ratio’s utility in anaphylaxis prediction. Methods: Retrospective study (2017-2021) of pediatric patients with TN/P allergy, grouped according to reaction severity (anaphylaxis–G1 vs milder reaction–G2). ST mean papule diameter (MPD), sIgE (ImmunoCAP ® ), mcIgE (ISAC ® ) and sIgE/total IgE ratio were compared (SPSS ® , p < 0.05: statistically significant). Results: 98 patients, 64% male, 88% concomitant allergic disorder, 40% allergy family history. Major culprit nuts: peanut (63%), hazelnut (59%) and walnut (53%). Index reaction manifestations were mostly cutaneous (46%), followed by anaphylaxis (36%). Chestnut and cashew sensitizations were significantly associated with anaphylaxis (OR=5.023, p=0.002; OR=2.901, p=0.018). MPD was higher in G1 for almond, cashew and pistachio (p < 0.05). sIgE was not a good severity predictor for any TN/P, however, a significantly higher value of sIgE/total IgE ratio was found in G1 for walnut (p=0.023). mcIgE was obtained in 49%: peanut Ara h2 and Ara h6 were more represented in G1 (2.8 vs 0 ISU-E, p=0.042; 1.3 vs 0 ISU-E, p=0.020). Conclusion: Peanut, hazelnut and walnut were the most frequent nuts. Anaphylaxis was the first manifestation in 36%, significantly higher in chestnut and cashew allergic children. MPD should be valued not only for diagnosis, but also for anaphylaxis risk prediction in almond, cashew and pistachio allergic patients. sIgE/total IgE ratio seems to be useful in anaphylaxis prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tree Nut and Peanut Allergy in a Portuguese Pediatric Cohort- Clinical Characterization and Anaphylaxis PredictorsLeonor Esteves Tears on Chest X-Ray in Children: Azygos Lobe A Neonate With Complete Congenital Heart Block Delivered Via Ex Utero Intrapartum Treatment (Exit) Procedure: A Case Report Value of Cortical Scintigraphy with Technetium-99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid (99mtc Dmsa) in Children with Acute Urinary Tract Infections 11 Cases of H-Type Tracheoesophageal Fistula: How Diagnosis and Treatment May Be Improved
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1