编者注

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American Periodicals Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/amp.2023.a911650
{"title":"编者注","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/amp.2023.a911650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editors' Note Sarah H. Salter The editors at American Periodicals are thrilled to share this fall's issue with readers. This special issue on Indigenous Periodicals is one result of ongoing and generative collaborations across scholars, colonial nations, and Indigenous Nations. Our guest editors' \"Introduction\" describes how the essays collected in this special issue were initially drawn from a series of panels and symposia in what is now called Pennsylvania (Philadelphia or Lënapehòkink, the ancestral homelands of the Lenape People) and Germany. Working with these editors and our own editorial community at American Periodicals, we have together endeavored to present a range of essays studying aspects of Indigenous Periodical cultures throughout parts of Turtle Island, now more commonly known as the United States. As their introductory essay explains so well, the guest editors of this issue see many opportunities in the turn to Indigenous Periodicals, which are \"complex media artifacts whose relation to the construction of sovereignty is articulated through periodicity, network, mediator, and archive. . . . [They] have served as distinct material carriers of Indigenous information and visual-graphic spaces of communication, knowledge production, and community-building\" (100). Certainly, we at American Periodicals believe our pages represent a welcoming space to explore and unfurl those artifacts and their meanings, even though our title remains complicit in the settler colonialist work of non-Tribal governance. Since the editorial collective at American Periodicals is not replete with experts in Native American and Indigenous Studies (NAIS), this special issue offered a chance to learn more—indeed, very much—about how our editorial work and publication context might be leveraged as responsible, respectful, and responsive to the ethical and historical considerations of publishing works by and about Indigenous Peoples in what is now the United States (\"America\"). Our Editorial Board includes Jacqueline Emery, who has long done recovery, analytical, and editorial work with the newspaper archives of Native Boarding Schools; many scholars have been consulted and many texts read. Throughout the process, we have been gratified and humbled at the chance to learn from and the chance to feature work on Indigenous print cultures that may benefit readers within and beyond the Native Nations and communities invoked herein. In 2005, Devon Mihesuah called for \"intelligent, complete works\" that can help \"teachers at all . . . levels . . . [to] educat[e] their students about the diversity of Native America and the contributions Natives have made to this country and to the world.\"1 It is our hope that [End Page v] the essays in this special issue will be useful to pedagogical communities as well as research ones for these very purposes. You will see that each essay includes a note about language choices particular to the essay. NAIS is in particular a field where language choices are highly contextualized, always in flux, and a regular source of debate and consideration. As an example of what Gregory Younging calls \"allied academic literature,\" the AP collective has taken heart in his call to \"plan on not getting it right. Make your best effort to make informed, mindful choices about terminology. . . . Find your way through, and show how you have found your way through.\"2 As each author has a different relation to the distinct Native Nations and Peoples they write about, each has made particular choices about the language they use. As general practice, the American Periodicals Style Guide suggests consistent use of specific names and terms whenever possible, or the use of Indigenous (capital letter as adjective) and Native (capital letter as adjective) for more general discussions. Our authors have followed these general guidelines and included reflections on word choice and purpose. Amongst others, we have been inspired by recent language summaries and reflections in Kathryn Walkiewicz's Reading Territory: Indigenous and Black Freedom, Removal, and the Nineteenth-Century State (Durham: University of North Carolina Press, 2023) and Kelly Wisecup's Assembled For Use: Indigenous Compilation and the Archives of Early Native American Literatures (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021) as well as Daniel Radus's discussion of exonyms and autonyms specific to the \"Oceti Sakowin Oyate, a confederation of seven Indigenous communities in the western Great Lakes and northern Plains\" in \"Pipestone Books: Indigenous Materialisms and...","PeriodicalId":41855,"journal":{"name":"American Periodicals","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors' Note\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/amp.2023.a911650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Editors' Note Sarah H. Salter The editors at American Periodicals are thrilled to share this fall's issue with readers. This special issue on Indigenous Periodicals is one result of ongoing and generative collaborations across scholars, colonial nations, and Indigenous Nations. Our guest editors' \\\"Introduction\\\" describes how the essays collected in this special issue were initially drawn from a series of panels and symposia in what is now called Pennsylvania (Philadelphia or Lënapehòkink, the ancestral homelands of the Lenape People) and Germany. Working with these editors and our own editorial community at American Periodicals, we have together endeavored to present a range of essays studying aspects of Indigenous Periodical cultures throughout parts of Turtle Island, now more commonly known as the United States. As their introductory essay explains so well, the guest editors of this issue see many opportunities in the turn to Indigenous Periodicals, which are \\\"complex media artifacts whose relation to the construction of sovereignty is articulated through periodicity, network, mediator, and archive. . . . [They] have served as distinct material carriers of Indigenous information and visual-graphic spaces of communication, knowledge production, and community-building\\\" (100). Certainly, we at American Periodicals believe our pages represent a welcoming space to explore and unfurl those artifacts and their meanings, even though our title remains complicit in the settler colonialist work of non-Tribal governance. Since the editorial collective at American Periodicals is not replete with experts in Native American and Indigenous Studies (NAIS), this special issue offered a chance to learn more—indeed, very much—about how our editorial work and publication context might be leveraged as responsible, respectful, and responsive to the ethical and historical considerations of publishing works by and about Indigenous Peoples in what is now the United States (\\\"America\\\"). Our Editorial Board includes Jacqueline Emery, who has long done recovery, analytical, and editorial work with the newspaper archives of Native Boarding Schools; many scholars have been consulted and many texts read. Throughout the process, we have been gratified and humbled at the chance to learn from and the chance to feature work on Indigenous print cultures that may benefit readers within and beyond the Native Nations and communities invoked herein. In 2005, Devon Mihesuah called for \\\"intelligent, complete works\\\" that can help \\\"teachers at all . . . levels . . . [to] educat[e] their students about the diversity of Native America and the contributions Natives have made to this country and to the world.\\\"1 It is our hope that [End Page v] the essays in this special issue will be useful to pedagogical communities as well as research ones for these very purposes. You will see that each essay includes a note about language choices particular to the essay. NAIS is in particular a field where language choices are highly contextualized, always in flux, and a regular source of debate and consideration. As an example of what Gregory Younging calls \\\"allied academic literature,\\\" the AP collective has taken heart in his call to \\\"plan on not getting it right. Make your best effort to make informed, mindful choices about terminology. . . . Find your way through, and show how you have found your way through.\\\"2 As each author has a different relation to the distinct Native Nations and Peoples they write about, each has made particular choices about the language they use. As general practice, the American Periodicals Style Guide suggests consistent use of specific names and terms whenever possible, or the use of Indigenous (capital letter as adjective) and Native (capital letter as adjective) for more general discussions. Our authors have followed these general guidelines and included reflections on word choice and purpose. Amongst others, we have been inspired by recent language summaries and reflections in Kathryn Walkiewicz's Reading Territory: Indigenous and Black Freedom, Removal, and the Nineteenth-Century State (Durham: University of North Carolina Press, 2023) and Kelly Wisecup's Assembled For Use: Indigenous Compilation and the Archives of Early Native American Literatures (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021) as well as Daniel Radus's discussion of exonyms and autonyms specific to the \\\"Oceti Sakowin Oyate, a confederation of seven Indigenous communities in the western Great Lakes and northern Plains\\\" in \\\"Pipestone Books: Indigenous Materialisms and...\",\"PeriodicalId\":41855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Periodicals\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Periodicals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/amp.2023.a911650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Periodicals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/amp.2023.a911650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《美国期刊》的编辑们很高兴能与读者们分享今年秋天的杂志。这期《原住民期刊》特刊是学者、殖民地国家和原住民民族之间持续而富有成效的合作成果之一。我们的客座编辑的“引言”描述了本期特刊中收集的文章最初是如何从现在的宾夕法尼亚州(费城或Lënapehòkink, Lenape人的祖籍地)和德国的一系列小组讨论和专题讨论会中抽取的。与这些编辑和我们自己在美国期刊的编辑社区合作,我们共同努力提出了一系列研究海龟岛部分地区土著期刊文化方面的文章,现在更广为人知的是美国。正如他们的介绍性文章所解释的那样,本期的客座编辑在转向土著期刊中看到了许多机会,这些期刊是“复杂的媒体人工制品,其与主权建设的关系通过期刊,网络,中介和档案来表达. . . .[它们]是土著信息的独特物质载体,也是交流、知识生产和社区建设的视觉图形空间”(100)。当然,我们美国期刊相信,我们的网页代表了一个欢迎探索和展现这些文物及其意义的空间,尽管我们的标题仍然与非部落治理的移民殖民主义工作有共通之处。由于《美国期刊》的编辑团队并不全是美国土著和土著研究(NAIS)方面的专家,所以这期特刊提供了一个机会,让我们更多地——实际上是非常多地——了解我们的编辑工作和出版环境如何发挥作用,以负责任、尊重和回应出版作品时的伦理和历史考虑,这些作品是由现在的美国(“美国”)的土著人民创作的。我们的编辑委员会包括杰奎琳·埃默里(Jacqueline Emery),她长期从事土著寄宿学校报纸档案的恢复、分析和编辑工作;咨询了许多学者,阅读了许多文本。在整个过程中,我们对有机会向土著印刷文化学习和专题工作感到高兴和谦卑,这些工作可能会使土著民族和社区内外的读者受益。2005年,德文·米赫苏亚(Devon Mihesuah)呼吁制定“智能的、完整的作品”,以帮助“教师……等级……教育他们的学生了解美洲原住民的多样性,以及他们对这个国家和世界的贡献。我们希望本期特刊中的文章对教学团体和研究团体都有帮助。你会看到每篇文章都有一个关于文章语言选择的注释。NAIS是一个语言选择高度语境化的领域,总是在不断变化,并且是辩论和思考的常规来源。作为格雷戈里·扬金所说的“联合学术文献”的一个例子,美联社集体在他的呼吁中“计划不正确”。尽你最大的努力对术语做出明智、谨慎的选择. . . .找到你的出路,并展示你是如何找到出路的。由于每位作者与他们所写的不同的土著民族和民族有着不同的关系,因此每位作者都对他们使用的语言做出了特殊的选择。作为一般做法,《美国期刊风格指南》建议尽可能使用特定的名称和术语,或者在更一般的讨论中使用Indigenous(大写字母作为形容词)和Native(大写字母作为形容词)。我们的作者遵循了这些一般的指导方针,并包括对用词和目的的反思。在其他方面,我们受到最近的语言总结和反思的启发凯瑟琳·沃克维奇的阅读领域:土著和黑人的自由,搬迁,和19世纪的状态(达勒姆:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2023)和凯利·威斯库普的组装使用:土著编译和早期美洲土著文学档案(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2021),以及Daniel Radus在《派普斯通书籍:土著唯物主义和……》中对“Oceti Sakowin Oyate,西部大湖和北部平原七个土著社区的联盟”的异义词和自治词的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editors' Note
Editors' Note Sarah H. Salter The editors at American Periodicals are thrilled to share this fall's issue with readers. This special issue on Indigenous Periodicals is one result of ongoing and generative collaborations across scholars, colonial nations, and Indigenous Nations. Our guest editors' "Introduction" describes how the essays collected in this special issue were initially drawn from a series of panels and symposia in what is now called Pennsylvania (Philadelphia or Lënapehòkink, the ancestral homelands of the Lenape People) and Germany. Working with these editors and our own editorial community at American Periodicals, we have together endeavored to present a range of essays studying aspects of Indigenous Periodical cultures throughout parts of Turtle Island, now more commonly known as the United States. As their introductory essay explains so well, the guest editors of this issue see many opportunities in the turn to Indigenous Periodicals, which are "complex media artifacts whose relation to the construction of sovereignty is articulated through periodicity, network, mediator, and archive. . . . [They] have served as distinct material carriers of Indigenous information and visual-graphic spaces of communication, knowledge production, and community-building" (100). Certainly, we at American Periodicals believe our pages represent a welcoming space to explore and unfurl those artifacts and their meanings, even though our title remains complicit in the settler colonialist work of non-Tribal governance. Since the editorial collective at American Periodicals is not replete with experts in Native American and Indigenous Studies (NAIS), this special issue offered a chance to learn more—indeed, very much—about how our editorial work and publication context might be leveraged as responsible, respectful, and responsive to the ethical and historical considerations of publishing works by and about Indigenous Peoples in what is now the United States ("America"). Our Editorial Board includes Jacqueline Emery, who has long done recovery, analytical, and editorial work with the newspaper archives of Native Boarding Schools; many scholars have been consulted and many texts read. Throughout the process, we have been gratified and humbled at the chance to learn from and the chance to feature work on Indigenous print cultures that may benefit readers within and beyond the Native Nations and communities invoked herein. In 2005, Devon Mihesuah called for "intelligent, complete works" that can help "teachers at all . . . levels . . . [to] educat[e] their students about the diversity of Native America and the contributions Natives have made to this country and to the world."1 It is our hope that [End Page v] the essays in this special issue will be useful to pedagogical communities as well as research ones for these very purposes. You will see that each essay includes a note about language choices particular to the essay. NAIS is in particular a field where language choices are highly contextualized, always in flux, and a regular source of debate and consideration. As an example of what Gregory Younging calls "allied academic literature," the AP collective has taken heart in his call to "plan on not getting it right. Make your best effort to make informed, mindful choices about terminology. . . . Find your way through, and show how you have found your way through."2 As each author has a different relation to the distinct Native Nations and Peoples they write about, each has made particular choices about the language they use. As general practice, the American Periodicals Style Guide suggests consistent use of specific names and terms whenever possible, or the use of Indigenous (capital letter as adjective) and Native (capital letter as adjective) for more general discussions. Our authors have followed these general guidelines and included reflections on word choice and purpose. Amongst others, we have been inspired by recent language summaries and reflections in Kathryn Walkiewicz's Reading Territory: Indigenous and Black Freedom, Removal, and the Nineteenth-Century State (Durham: University of North Carolina Press, 2023) and Kelly Wisecup's Assembled For Use: Indigenous Compilation and the Archives of Early Native American Literatures (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021) as well as Daniel Radus's discussion of exonyms and autonyms specific to the "Oceti Sakowin Oyate, a confederation of seven Indigenous communities in the western Great Lakes and northern Plains" in "Pipestone Books: Indigenous Materialisms and...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Periodicals
American Periodicals HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indian Territory Reimagined: Ora Eddleman Reed's Twin Territories Editors' Note Working Children in the History of American Periodicals "You Could Speak the Truth with a Tongue of Fire": The Cultural and Political Work of Indigenous Periodicals Little Chahta News Bird: Indigenous Periodicals and the Performance of Nationhood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1