通过测量和统计学的望远镜追踪真相

IF 3.9 1区 数学 Q1 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Statistical Science Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1214/23-sts899
Antonio Possolo
{"title":"通过测量和统计学的望远镜追踪真相","authors":"Antonio Possolo","doi":"10.1214/23-sts899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The measurement of a quantity is reproducible when mutually independent, multiple measurements made of it yield mutually consistent measurement results, that is, when the measured values, after due allowance for their associated uncertainties, do not differ significantly from one another. Interlaboratory comparisons organized deliberately for the purpose, and meta-analyses that are structured so as to be fit for the same purpose, are procedures of choice to ascertain measurement reproducibility. The realistic evaluation of measurement uncertainty is a key preliminary to the assessment of reproducibility because lack of reproducibility manifests itself as dispersion or variability of measured values in excess of what their associated uncertainties suggest that they should exhibit. For this reason, we review the distinctive traits of measurement in the physical sciences and technologies, including medicine, and discuss the meaning and expression of measurement uncertainty. This contribution illustrates the application of statistical models and methods to quantify measurement uncertainty and to assess reproducibility in four concrete, real-life examples, in the process revealing that lack of reproducibility can be a consequence of one or more of the following: intrinsic differences between laboratories making measurements; choice of statistical model and of procedure for data reduction or of causes yet to be identified. Despite the instances of lack of reproducibility that we review, and many others like them, the outlook is optimistic. First, because “lack of reproducibility is not necessarily bad news; it may herald new discoveries and signal scientific progress” (Nat. Phys. 16 (2020) 117–119). Second, and as the example about the measurement of the Newtonian constant of gravitation, G, illustrates, when faced with a reproducibility crisis the scientific community often engages in cooperative efforts to understand the root causes of the lack of reproducibility, leading to advances in scientific knowledge.","PeriodicalId":51172,"journal":{"name":"Statistical Science","volume":"45 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tracking Truth Through Measurement and the Spyglass of Statistics\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Possolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1214/23-sts899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The measurement of a quantity is reproducible when mutually independent, multiple measurements made of it yield mutually consistent measurement results, that is, when the measured values, after due allowance for their associated uncertainties, do not differ significantly from one another. Interlaboratory comparisons organized deliberately for the purpose, and meta-analyses that are structured so as to be fit for the same purpose, are procedures of choice to ascertain measurement reproducibility. The realistic evaluation of measurement uncertainty is a key preliminary to the assessment of reproducibility because lack of reproducibility manifests itself as dispersion or variability of measured values in excess of what their associated uncertainties suggest that they should exhibit. For this reason, we review the distinctive traits of measurement in the physical sciences and technologies, including medicine, and discuss the meaning and expression of measurement uncertainty. This contribution illustrates the application of statistical models and methods to quantify measurement uncertainty and to assess reproducibility in four concrete, real-life examples, in the process revealing that lack of reproducibility can be a consequence of one or more of the following: intrinsic differences between laboratories making measurements; choice of statistical model and of procedure for data reduction or of causes yet to be identified. Despite the instances of lack of reproducibility that we review, and many others like them, the outlook is optimistic. First, because “lack of reproducibility is not necessarily bad news; it may herald new discoveries and signal scientific progress” (Nat. Phys. 16 (2020) 117–119). Second, and as the example about the measurement of the Newtonian constant of gravitation, G, illustrates, when faced with a reproducibility crisis the scientific community often engages in cooperative efforts to understand the root causes of the lack of reproducibility, leading to advances in scientific knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistical Science\",\"volume\":\"45 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1214/23-sts899\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/23-sts899","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当对一个量进行的相互独立的多次测量产生相互一致的测量结果时,该量的测量是可重复的,也就是说,当测量值在适当考虑其相关不确定度后,彼此之间没有显着差异时。为了达到目的而特意组织的实验室间比较,以及为了达到同样目的而组织的荟萃分析,都是确定测量可重复性的首选程序。测量不确定度的实际评估是评估可重复性的关键先决条件,因为缺乏可重复性表现为测量值的分散或变异性超过了与其相关的不确定度所显示的值。因此,我们回顾了测量在包括医学在内的物理科学和技术中的独特特征,并讨论了测量不确定度的含义和表达。这一贡献说明了统计模型和方法的应用,以量化测量不确定性,并在四个具体的,现实生活中的例子中评估再现性,在这个过程中揭示了缺乏再现性可能是以下一个或多个结果:实验室之间的内在差异进行测量;选择统计模型和数据缩减程序,或选择尚未确定的原因。尽管我们回顾了缺乏可重复性的例子,以及许多其他类似的例子,但前景是乐观的。首先,因为“缺乏可重复性不一定是坏消息;它可能预示着新的发现和标志着科学进步”(Nat. Phys. 16(2020) 117-119)。其次,正如牛顿引力常数G测量的例子所表明的那样,当面临可重复性危机时,科学界通常会通过合作努力来了解缺乏可重复性的根本原因,从而推动科学知识的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tracking Truth Through Measurement and the Spyglass of Statistics
The measurement of a quantity is reproducible when mutually independent, multiple measurements made of it yield mutually consistent measurement results, that is, when the measured values, after due allowance for their associated uncertainties, do not differ significantly from one another. Interlaboratory comparisons organized deliberately for the purpose, and meta-analyses that are structured so as to be fit for the same purpose, are procedures of choice to ascertain measurement reproducibility. The realistic evaluation of measurement uncertainty is a key preliminary to the assessment of reproducibility because lack of reproducibility manifests itself as dispersion or variability of measured values in excess of what their associated uncertainties suggest that they should exhibit. For this reason, we review the distinctive traits of measurement in the physical sciences and technologies, including medicine, and discuss the meaning and expression of measurement uncertainty. This contribution illustrates the application of statistical models and methods to quantify measurement uncertainty and to assess reproducibility in four concrete, real-life examples, in the process revealing that lack of reproducibility can be a consequence of one or more of the following: intrinsic differences between laboratories making measurements; choice of statistical model and of procedure for data reduction or of causes yet to be identified. Despite the instances of lack of reproducibility that we review, and many others like them, the outlook is optimistic. First, because “lack of reproducibility is not necessarily bad news; it may herald new discoveries and signal scientific progress” (Nat. Phys. 16 (2020) 117–119). Second, and as the example about the measurement of the Newtonian constant of gravitation, G, illustrates, when faced with a reproducibility crisis the scientific community often engages in cooperative efforts to understand the root causes of the lack of reproducibility, leading to advances in scientific knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistical Science
Statistical Science 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The central purpose of Statistical Science is to convey the richness, breadth and unity of the field by presenting the full range of contemporary statistical thought at a moderate technical level, accessible to the wide community of practitioners, researchers and students of statistics and probability.
期刊最新文献
Variable Selection Using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees. Defining Replicability of Prediction Rules Tracking Truth Through Measurement and the Spyglass of Statistics Replicability Across Multiple Studies Game-Theoretic Statistics and Safe Anytime-Valid Inference
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1