人工智能(AI)可以改变政策建模的方式

IF 3.5 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Policy Modeling Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.11.005
Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada , Donghyun Park , Marcin Staniewski
{"title":"人工智能(AI)可以改变政策建模的方式","authors":"Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada ,&nbsp;Donghyun Park ,&nbsp;Marcin Staniewski","doi":"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper seeks to assess the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in policy modeling. Rapid advancements in AI, encompassing algorithms, advanced programming software, robotics, metadata, sophisticated mathematical models, neural networks, and graphical models are ushering in innovative new research methods for analysing and resolving intricate socio-economic issues. Our focus lies in a comparative evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Response (AIR) versus Human Intelligence Response (HIR) in generating swift and potent solutions to various socio-economic challenges. To achieve this, we propose a fundamental model for appraising the effectiveness of policy modeling, known as the \"Policy Modeling Response Evaluator (PMR-Evaluator).\" Furthermore, we conducted an experiment to gauge the responsiveness and effectiveness of both AIR and HIR. This experiment revolved around addressing a specific socio-economic problem, namely controlling inflation. Initially, we scrutinized responses from an extensive database of papers published in the Journal of Policy Modeling (JPM) by Elsevier over the past forty-five years (1978–2023) to ascertain HIR's capacity to analyze and resolve inflation-related issues. Concurrently, we utilized ChatGPT, a powerful artificial intelligence application (AI-APP), to explore potential solutions for controlling inflation. Ultimately, we analyzed whether HIR or AIR proved more effective and precise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Modeling","volume":"45 6","pages":"Pages 1099-1112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence (AI) can change the way of doing policy modelling\",\"authors\":\"Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada ,&nbsp;Donghyun Park ,&nbsp;Marcin Staniewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.11.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper seeks to assess the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in policy modeling. Rapid advancements in AI, encompassing algorithms, advanced programming software, robotics, metadata, sophisticated mathematical models, neural networks, and graphical models are ushering in innovative new research methods for analysing and resolving intricate socio-economic issues. Our focus lies in a comparative evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Response (AIR) versus Human Intelligence Response (HIR) in generating swift and potent solutions to various socio-economic challenges. To achieve this, we propose a fundamental model for appraising the effectiveness of policy modeling, known as the \\\"Policy Modeling Response Evaluator (PMR-Evaluator).\\\" Furthermore, we conducted an experiment to gauge the responsiveness and effectiveness of both AIR and HIR. This experiment revolved around addressing a specific socio-economic problem, namely controlling inflation. Initially, we scrutinized responses from an extensive database of papers published in the Journal of Policy Modeling (JPM) by Elsevier over the past forty-five years (1978–2023) to ascertain HIR's capacity to analyze and resolve inflation-related issues. Concurrently, we utilized ChatGPT, a powerful artificial intelligence application (AI-APP), to explore potential solutions for controlling inflation. Ultimately, we analyzed whether HIR or AIR proved more effective and precise.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy Modeling\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1099-1112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893823001199\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893823001199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在评估人工智能(AI)在政策建模方面的变革潜力。人工智能的快速发展,包括算法、先进的编程软件、机器人、元数据、复杂的数学模型、神经网络和图形模型,为分析和解决复杂的社会经济问题带来了创新的研究方法。我们的重点在于人工智能响应(AIR)与人类智能响应(HIR)的比较评估,以产生针对各种社会经济挑战的快速有效的解决方案。为了实现这一目标,我们提出了一个评估政策建模有效性的基本模型,称为“政策建模响应评估器(PMR-Evaluator)”。此外,我们还进行了一项实验来衡量AIR和HIR的反应性和有效性。这个实验围绕着解决一个特定的社会经济问题,即控制通货膨胀。首先,我们仔细审查了爱思唯尔在过去45年(1978-2023年)发表在《政策建模杂志》(JPM)上的大量论文数据库中的回应,以确定HIR分析和解决通胀相关问题的能力。同时,我们利用强大的人工智能应用(AI-APP) ChatGPT,探索控制通货膨胀的潜在解决方案。最后,我们分析了HIR和AIR孰优孰劣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence (AI) can change the way of doing policy modelling

This paper seeks to assess the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in policy modeling. Rapid advancements in AI, encompassing algorithms, advanced programming software, robotics, metadata, sophisticated mathematical models, neural networks, and graphical models are ushering in innovative new research methods for analysing and resolving intricate socio-economic issues. Our focus lies in a comparative evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Response (AIR) versus Human Intelligence Response (HIR) in generating swift and potent solutions to various socio-economic challenges. To achieve this, we propose a fundamental model for appraising the effectiveness of policy modeling, known as the "Policy Modeling Response Evaluator (PMR-Evaluator)." Furthermore, we conducted an experiment to gauge the responsiveness and effectiveness of both AIR and HIR. This experiment revolved around addressing a specific socio-economic problem, namely controlling inflation. Initially, we scrutinized responses from an extensive database of papers published in the Journal of Policy Modeling (JPM) by Elsevier over the past forty-five years (1978–2023) to ascertain HIR's capacity to analyze and resolve inflation-related issues. Concurrently, we utilized ChatGPT, a powerful artificial intelligence application (AI-APP), to explore potential solutions for controlling inflation. Ultimately, we analyzed whether HIR or AIR proved more effective and precise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Journal of Policy Modeling is published by Elsevier for the Society for Policy Modeling to provide a forum for analysis and debate concerning international policy issues. The journal addresses questions of critical import to the world community as a whole, and it focuses upon the economic, social, and political interdependencies between national and regional systems. This implies concern with international policies for the promotion of a better life for all human beings and, therefore, concentrates on improved methodological underpinnings for dealing with these problems.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Immigration and the distribution of income, consumption and wealth in the euro area: Implications for economic policies Fed and ECB reaction functions during quantitative easing: Three phases of monetary policy, both conventional and unconventional How do carbon prices spill over along global supply chains? The impact on Europe and Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1