{"title":"澳大利亚的本土外交及其在大洋洲的区域共鸣","authors":"Sala George Carter, Greg Fry","doi":"10.1080/10357718.2023.2268024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mary Graham and Morgan Brigg’s philosophical approach to Indigenous political ordering and inter-polity relations breaks new ground for scholarly and practice deliberations about Indigenous diplomacy. Our response takes up questions of the meaning, practice, and efficacy of Indigenous diplomacy with reference to wider Indigenous diplomacy in the Pacific which we call Oceanic Diplomacy. We contextualise Australian developments in relation to the region before considering examples from Pacific diplomatic practice to show how Indigenous diplomacy can be a valuable game changer or flawed window dressing. We also consider points of similarity and difference with their approach to ideas of ‘relationalism’ and ‘survivalism’. Overall, we argue that their principled approach to the philosophy of ‘relationality’ will find resonance in the Pacific and is necessary to counter instrumental approaches to the mobilisation of Indigenous diplomacy to be effective.","PeriodicalId":51708,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of International Affairs","volume":"33 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australia’s indigenous diplomacy and its regional resonance in Oceania\",\"authors\":\"Sala George Carter, Greg Fry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10357718.2023.2268024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mary Graham and Morgan Brigg’s philosophical approach to Indigenous political ordering and inter-polity relations breaks new ground for scholarly and practice deliberations about Indigenous diplomacy. Our response takes up questions of the meaning, practice, and efficacy of Indigenous diplomacy with reference to wider Indigenous diplomacy in the Pacific which we call Oceanic Diplomacy. We contextualise Australian developments in relation to the region before considering examples from Pacific diplomatic practice to show how Indigenous diplomacy can be a valuable game changer or flawed window dressing. We also consider points of similarity and difference with their approach to ideas of ‘relationalism’ and ‘survivalism’. Overall, we argue that their principled approach to the philosophy of ‘relationality’ will find resonance in the Pacific and is necessary to counter instrumental approaches to the mobilisation of Indigenous diplomacy to be effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of International Affairs\",\"volume\":\"33 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2268024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2268024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Australia’s indigenous diplomacy and its regional resonance in Oceania
Mary Graham and Morgan Brigg’s philosophical approach to Indigenous political ordering and inter-polity relations breaks new ground for scholarly and practice deliberations about Indigenous diplomacy. Our response takes up questions of the meaning, practice, and efficacy of Indigenous diplomacy with reference to wider Indigenous diplomacy in the Pacific which we call Oceanic Diplomacy. We contextualise Australian developments in relation to the region before considering examples from Pacific diplomatic practice to show how Indigenous diplomacy can be a valuable game changer or flawed window dressing. We also consider points of similarity and difference with their approach to ideas of ‘relationalism’ and ‘survivalism’. Overall, we argue that their principled approach to the philosophy of ‘relationality’ will find resonance in the Pacific and is necessary to counter instrumental approaches to the mobilisation of Indigenous diplomacy to be effective.
期刊介绍:
AJIA is the journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs. The Institute was established in 1933 as an independent and non-political body and its purpose is to stimulate interest in and understanding of international affairs among its members and the general public. The aim of the Australian Journal of International Affairs is to publish high quality scholarly research on international political, social, economic and legal issues, especially (but not exclusively) within the Asia-Pacific region. The journal publishes research articles, refereed review essays and commentary and provocation pieces. ''Articles'' are traditional scholarly articles. ‘Review essays’ use newly published books as the basis to thematically examine current events in International Relations. The journal also publishes commentaries and provocations which are high quality and engaging pieces of commentary, opinion and provocation in a variety of styles. The Australian Journal of International Affairs aims to analyse international issues for an Australian readership and to present Australian perspectives to readers in other countries. While seeking to stimulate interest in and understanding of international affairs, the journal does not seek to promote any particular policies or approaches. All suitable manuscripts submitted are sent to two referees in a full ''double blind'' refereeing process.