企业社会责任和额外津贴

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Empirical Finance Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101443
Dan Xi , Yuze Wu , Xue Wang , Zhe Fu
{"title":"企业社会责任和额外津贴","authors":"Dan Xi ,&nbsp;Yuze Wu ,&nbsp;Xue Wang ,&nbsp;Zhe Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the effect of mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm excess perks by exploiting China's 2008 mandate requiring firms to disclose CSR activities with a difference-in-differences design. We find that firms mandated to report CSR experience a decrease in excess perks subsequent to the mandate. Our empirical results also reveal that the decrease in excessive perks is more pronounced for firms with worse information environments, suggesting that mandatory CSR disclosure significantly reduces executive excessive perks and restricts managers’ unethical behavior by improving the quality of the information environment for investors. Also, we investigate an alternative channel from a managerial human capital dimension and find that reputed CEOs are more likely to regulate their behavior when mandated to disclose more non-financial information. Finally, we find that the mandatory CSR disclosure seems to improve firms’ sensitivity of pay-for-performance but show no impact on excess total cash compensation, suggesting that the improved performance-driven incentives are mainly driven by the reduced excessive perks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate social responsibility and excess perks\",\"authors\":\"Dan Xi ,&nbsp;Yuze Wu ,&nbsp;Xue Wang ,&nbsp;Zhe Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines the effect of mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm excess perks by exploiting China's 2008 mandate requiring firms to disclose CSR activities with a difference-in-differences design. We find that firms mandated to report CSR experience a decrease in excess perks subsequent to the mandate. Our empirical results also reveal that the decrease in excessive perks is more pronounced for firms with worse information environments, suggesting that mandatory CSR disclosure significantly reduces executive excessive perks and restricts managers’ unethical behavior by improving the quality of the information environment for investors. Also, we investigate an alternative channel from a managerial human capital dimension and find that reputed CEOs are more likely to regulate their behavior when mandated to disclose more non-financial information. Finally, we find that the mandatory CSR disclosure seems to improve firms’ sensitivity of pay-for-performance but show no impact on excess total cash compensation, suggesting that the improved performance-driven incentives are mainly driven by the reduced excessive perks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092753982300110X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092753982300110X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究利用中国2008年强制要求企业披露企业社会责任活动的差异设计,考察强制性企业社会责任(CSR)对企业超额津贴的影响。我们发现,被要求报告企业社会责任的公司在被要求报告企业社会责任后,其超额津贴有所减少。我们的实证结果还显示,信息环境越差的公司,过度津贴的减少越明显,这表明强制性企业社会责任披露通过改善投资者信息环境的质量,显著减少了高管过度津贴的减少,约束了管理者的不道德行为。此外,我们从管理人力资本维度考察了另一种渠道,发现当被要求披露更多非财务信息时,声誉良好的ceo更有可能规范自己的行为。最后,我们发现强制性企业社会责任披露似乎提高了企业对绩效薪酬的敏感性,但对超额现金薪酬总额没有影响,这表明绩效激励的改善主要是由过度津贴的减少驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corporate social responsibility and excess perks

This study examines the effect of mandatory corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm excess perks by exploiting China's 2008 mandate requiring firms to disclose CSR activities with a difference-in-differences design. We find that firms mandated to report CSR experience a decrease in excess perks subsequent to the mandate. Our empirical results also reveal that the decrease in excessive perks is more pronounced for firms with worse information environments, suggesting that mandatory CSR disclosure significantly reduces executive excessive perks and restricts managers’ unethical behavior by improving the quality of the information environment for investors. Also, we investigate an alternative channel from a managerial human capital dimension and find that reputed CEOs are more likely to regulate their behavior when mandated to disclose more non-financial information. Finally, we find that the mandatory CSR disclosure seems to improve firms’ sensitivity of pay-for-performance but show no impact on excess total cash compensation, suggesting that the improved performance-driven incentives are mainly driven by the reduced excessive perks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board On the performance of volatility-managed equity factors — International and further evidence CEO neuroticism and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from CEOs’ tweets High-frequency realized stochastic volatility model Jump tail risk exposure and the cross-section of stock returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1