Juan Camilo Triana-Madrid, Camilo Ocampo-Marulanda, Yesid Carvajal-Escobar, Wilmar Alexander Torres-López, Joshua Triana, Teresita Canchala
{"title":"基于稀缺信息的哥伦比亚西南部月参考蒸散量机器学习估算","authors":"Juan Camilo Triana-Madrid, Camilo Ocampo-Marulanda, Yesid Carvajal-Escobar, Wilmar Alexander Torres-López, Joshua Triana, Teresita Canchala","doi":"10.24215/1850-468xe024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to identify an alternative method to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) with scarce climatological information in southwestern Colombia between 1983-2017 by evaluating and comparing different machine learning techniques. The FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM56) was used as the reference method and four empirical methods (Hargreaves, Thornthwaite, Cenicafé, and Turc) were assessed with five metrics to evaluate the method of best fit to FAO-PM56, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean bias error (MBE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE), and Pearson correlation coefficient (R). Three models were designed using machine learning techniques to estimate ETo, multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), and autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA). The results showed that the ARIMA-M3 model reported the best performance metrics (RMSE = 4.13 mm month-1, MAE = 3.15 mm month-1, MBE = -0.08 mm month-1, NSE = 0.96 and r = 0.98). However, it restricts in that it can only be used locally and cannot be extrapolated to other climatological stations,because it was calibrated with specific conditions (exogenous variables) and stations,unlike the ANN-M1 model, which only requires training the network for its application. This method will allow estimating ETo in places with scarce information, as vital for water management in places with much uncertainty regarding accessibility and availability.","PeriodicalId":37823,"journal":{"name":"Meteorologica","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Monthly Reference Evapotranspiration with Scarce Information Using Machine Learning in Southwestern Colombia\",\"authors\":\"Juan Camilo Triana-Madrid, Camilo Ocampo-Marulanda, Yesid Carvajal-Escobar, Wilmar Alexander Torres-López, Joshua Triana, Teresita Canchala\",\"doi\":\"10.24215/1850-468xe024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to identify an alternative method to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) with scarce climatological information in southwestern Colombia between 1983-2017 by evaluating and comparing different machine learning techniques. The FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM56) was used as the reference method and four empirical methods (Hargreaves, Thornthwaite, Cenicafé, and Turc) were assessed with five metrics to evaluate the method of best fit to FAO-PM56, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean bias error (MBE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE), and Pearson correlation coefficient (R). Three models were designed using machine learning techniques to estimate ETo, multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), and autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA). The results showed that the ARIMA-M3 model reported the best performance metrics (RMSE = 4.13 mm month-1, MAE = 3.15 mm month-1, MBE = -0.08 mm month-1, NSE = 0.96 and r = 0.98). However, it restricts in that it can only be used locally and cannot be extrapolated to other climatological stations,because it was calibrated with specific conditions (exogenous variables) and stations,unlike the ANN-M1 model, which only requires training the network for its application. This method will allow estimating ETo in places with scarce information, as vital for water management in places with much uncertainty regarding accessibility and availability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteorologica\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteorologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24215/1850-468xe024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24215/1850-468xe024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在通过评估和比较不同的机器学习技术,确定一种替代方法,在1983-2017年期间利用哥伦比亚西南部稀缺的气候信息估计参考蒸散发(ETo)。采用FAO Penman-Monteith模型(FAO- pm56)作为参考方法,采用5个指标对4种实证方法(Hargreaves、Thornthwaite、cenicaf和Turc)进行评估,以评价最适合FAO- pm56模型的方法:均方根误差(RMSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均偏倚误差(MBE)、Nash-Sutcliffe模型效率系数(NSE)和Pearson相关系数(R)。利用机器学习技术设计了3个模型来估计ETo。多元线性回归(MLR)、人工神经网络(ANN)和自回归综合移动平均模型(ARIMA)。结果表明,ARIMA-M3模型报告的性能指标最佳(RMSE = 4.13 mm -1个月,MAE = 3.15 mm -1个月,MBE = -0.08 mm -1个月,NSE = 0.96, r = 0.98)。然而,它的局限性在于,它只能在当地使用,不能外推到其他气候站,因为它是用特定条件(外生变量)和台站校准的,不像ANN-M1模型,它只需要训练网络就可以应用。这种方法将允许在信息匮乏的地方估计ETo,这对于在可及性和可用性方面存在很大不确定性的地方的水管理至关重要。
Estimation of Monthly Reference Evapotranspiration with Scarce Information Using Machine Learning in Southwestern Colombia
This research aimed to identify an alternative method to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) with scarce climatological information in southwestern Colombia between 1983-2017 by evaluating and comparing different machine learning techniques. The FAO Penman-Monteith (FAO-PM56) was used as the reference method and four empirical methods (Hargreaves, Thornthwaite, Cenicafé, and Turc) were assessed with five metrics to evaluate the method of best fit to FAO-PM56, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean bias error (MBE), Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (NSE), and Pearson correlation coefficient (R). Three models were designed using machine learning techniques to estimate ETo, multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN), and autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA). The results showed that the ARIMA-M3 model reported the best performance metrics (RMSE = 4.13 mm month-1, MAE = 3.15 mm month-1, MBE = -0.08 mm month-1, NSE = 0.96 and r = 0.98). However, it restricts in that it can only be used locally and cannot be extrapolated to other climatological stations,because it was calibrated with specific conditions (exogenous variables) and stations,unlike the ANN-M1 model, which only requires training the network for its application. This method will allow estimating ETo in places with scarce information, as vital for water management in places with much uncertainty regarding accessibility and availability.
MeteorologicaEarth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍:
Meteorologica is the semestral journal of Centro Argentino de Meteorólogos, which is published since 1970 and serves on the Core of Argentine Scientific Journals since 2005. Meteorologica publishes original papers in the field of atmospheric sciences and oceanography written in Spanish or English. Theoretical and applied research description, dataset description, extensive reviews about a particular topic related with atmospheric sciences or oceanography are within the journal scope. Papers must be original and concise. Meteorologica publishes one volume (two issues) per year.