{"title":"提高大额订单的流动性是否能吸引机构投资者和分析师?从 \"点数大小 \"试点计划中获得的证据","authors":"Mengdie Deng, Tse-Chun Lin, Jiayu Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.finmar.2023.100870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on the SEC's Tick Size Pilot Program, we adopt a difference-in-differences design and find that the improved liquidity for large orders increases their ownership of the treatment firms with a larger tick size during the program. The effect is concentrated among firms with lower liquidity for large orders ex ante and mainly comes from dedicated investors and quasi-indexers. We also find that analyst coverage and forecast accuracy increase for the treatment firms, plausibly catering to the increased information demand of institutional investors. Consequently, price efficiency increases as well. Overall, we show the bright side of this controversial program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 100870"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does better liquidity for large orders attract institutional investors and analysts? Evidence from the Tick Size Pilot Program\",\"authors\":\"Mengdie Deng, Tse-Chun Lin, Jiayu Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.finmar.2023.100870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Based on the SEC's Tick Size Pilot Program, we adopt a difference-in-differences design and find that the improved liquidity for large orders increases their ownership of the treatment firms with a larger tick size during the program. The effect is concentrated among firms with lower liquidity for large orders ex ante and mainly comes from dedicated investors and quasi-indexers. We also find that analyst coverage and forecast accuracy increase for the treatment firms, plausibly catering to the increased information demand of institutional investors. Consequently, price efficiency increases as well. Overall, we show the bright side of this controversial program.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100870\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138641812300068X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138641812300068X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does better liquidity for large orders attract institutional investors and analysts? Evidence from the Tick Size Pilot Program
Based on the SEC's Tick Size Pilot Program, we adopt a difference-in-differences design and find that the improved liquidity for large orders increases their ownership of the treatment firms with a larger tick size during the program. The effect is concentrated among firms with lower liquidity for large orders ex ante and mainly comes from dedicated investors and quasi-indexers. We also find that analyst coverage and forecast accuracy increase for the treatment firms, plausibly catering to the increased information demand of institutional investors. Consequently, price efficiency increases as well. Overall, we show the bright side of this controversial program.