走向什么正义,为谁正义?对迈阿密大学教学、课程与教育探究系“门槛”概念的批判与反思

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Equity & Excellence in Education Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1080/10665684.2023.2262481
Nathaniel Bryan
{"title":"走向什么正义,为谁正义?对迈阿密大学教学、课程与教育探究系“门槛”概念的批判与反思","authors":"Nathaniel Bryan","doi":"10.1080/10665684.2023.2262481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article is my personal and decidedly unapologetic Black meditation on and against the threshold concepts the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry, where I formerly taught has embraced as a means of addressing issues of social justice. Threshold concepts are a set of guide posts to enact change. Drawing on Black critical theory, this article argues that the concepts ignore Black suffering in and beyond K-12 schools and, thus, are anti-Black in nature. In so doing, I ask, When anti-Blackness is deafeningly silent and visibly missing from the threshold concepts, toward what justice and justice for whom is the department aiming? If threshold concepts are irreversible, transformative, integrative, troublesome, and bounded, what do they mean when the theorization of anti-Blackness is foregrounded within them? Recommendations are provided for teacher education broadly and the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry in the College of Education, Health, and Society at Miami University (Ohio). Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNathaniel BryanNathaniel Bryan, PhD is formerly an associate professor at Miami University (Ohio) and is currently an associate professor of early childhood education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at The University of Texas at Austin. His research addresses the teaching styles of Black male teachers in early childhood education and the lived schooling and play experiences of Black boys in early childhood education.","PeriodicalId":47334,"journal":{"name":"Equity & Excellence in Education","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward What Justice and Justice for Whom? A BlackCrit Meditation on and against Miami University’s Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry’s Threshold Concepts\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10665684.2023.2262481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis article is my personal and decidedly unapologetic Black meditation on and against the threshold concepts the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry, where I formerly taught has embraced as a means of addressing issues of social justice. Threshold concepts are a set of guide posts to enact change. Drawing on Black critical theory, this article argues that the concepts ignore Black suffering in and beyond K-12 schools and, thus, are anti-Black in nature. In so doing, I ask, When anti-Blackness is deafeningly silent and visibly missing from the threshold concepts, toward what justice and justice for whom is the department aiming? If threshold concepts are irreversible, transformative, integrative, troublesome, and bounded, what do they mean when the theorization of anti-Blackness is foregrounded within them? Recommendations are provided for teacher education broadly and the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry in the College of Education, Health, and Society at Miami University (Ohio). Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNathaniel BryanNathaniel Bryan, PhD is formerly an associate professor at Miami University (Ohio) and is currently an associate professor of early childhood education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at The University of Texas at Austin. His research addresses the teaching styles of Black male teachers in early childhood education and the lived schooling and play experiences of Black boys in early childhood education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2023.2262481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equity & Excellence in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2023.2262481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是我个人对教学、课程和教育探究系的门槛概念的思考和反对,这是我以前教书的地方,被当作解决社会正义问题的一种手段。阈值概念是制定变更的一组指导柱。根据黑人批判理论,本文认为这些概念忽视了黑人在K-12学校内外的痛苦,因此本质上是反黑人的。在这样做的过程中,我问,当反黑人是震耳欲聋的沉默和明显缺失的门槛概念,正义和正义的部门是为了谁?如果阈值概念是不可逆的、变革性的、综合性的、麻烦的和有界限的,那么当反黑人的理论化在其中被强调时,它们意味着什么?本研究为迈阿密大学(俄亥俄州)教育、健康和社会学院教学、课程和教育探究系的教师教育提供了广泛的建议。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:作者简介:他的研究涉及黑人男性教师在早期儿童教育中的教学风格和黑人男孩在早期儿童教育中的生活学习和游戏经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward What Justice and Justice for Whom? A BlackCrit Meditation on and against Miami University’s Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry’s Threshold Concepts
ABSTRACTThis article is my personal and decidedly unapologetic Black meditation on and against the threshold concepts the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry, where I formerly taught has embraced as a means of addressing issues of social justice. Threshold concepts are a set of guide posts to enact change. Drawing on Black critical theory, this article argues that the concepts ignore Black suffering in and beyond K-12 schools and, thus, are anti-Black in nature. In so doing, I ask, When anti-Blackness is deafeningly silent and visibly missing from the threshold concepts, toward what justice and justice for whom is the department aiming? If threshold concepts are irreversible, transformative, integrative, troublesome, and bounded, what do they mean when the theorization of anti-Blackness is foregrounded within them? Recommendations are provided for teacher education broadly and the Department of Teaching, Curriculum, and Educational Inquiry in the College of Education, Health, and Society at Miami University (Ohio). Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsNathaniel BryanNathaniel Bryan, PhD is formerly an associate professor at Miami University (Ohio) and is currently an associate professor of early childhood education in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction at The University of Texas at Austin. His research addresses the teaching styles of Black male teachers in early childhood education and the lived schooling and play experiences of Black boys in early childhood education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Equity & Excellence in Education
Equity & Excellence in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
23.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Equity & Excellence in Education publishes articles based on scholarly research utilizing qualitative or quantitative methods, as well as essays that describe and assess practical efforts to achieve educational equity and are contextualized within an appropriate literature review. We consider manuscripts on a range of topics related to equity, equality and social justice in K-12 or postsecondary schooling, and that focus upon social justice issues in school systems, individual schools, classrooms, and/or the social justice factors that contribute to inequality in learning for students from diverse social group backgrounds. There have been and will continue to be many social justice efforts to transform educational systems as well as interpersonal interactions at all levels of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Imagining Disability Justice in Arts Education: Loving Critiques and Pathways Forward Chismosas Against White Hetero-patriarchy: Chisme as a Literacy Pedagogy of Resistant Girlhood/Womanhood FOR THE CULTURE We are transformers: on being black, women, and pedagogues Freedom Moves: Theorizing Hip Hop as Black Liberatory Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1