争取承认的正义:对弗吉尼亚州白金汉县拟议的压缩机站的制图-情感抵抗

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1089/env.2022.0090
Janeé Petersen, Harold A. Perkins
{"title":"争取承认的正义:对弗吉尼亚州白金汉县拟议的压缩机站的制图-情感抵抗","authors":"Janeé Petersen, Harold A. Perkins","doi":"10.1089/env.2022.0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Problem: In 2014, Dominion Energy proposed a large compressor station in Buckingham County, Virginia to pressurize its Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Dominion and regulators presented demographic data that erased African Americans living near the compressor site in the community of Union Hill, to circumvent environmental justice concerns during the permitting process. Theoretical Framing: The erasure of African Americans in Union Hill for the construction of a compressor station was a recognitional injustice. Art is useful for contesting misrecognition by generating affective solidarities among various and dispersed groups of people concerned about injustice. Case Study Design: Qualitative methods are used to study how protestors deploy creativity to overcome misrecognition in Union Hill and Greater Buckingham County, Virginia. We focus, in particular, on two photographic series created to generate affect against the compressor station and pipeline. Case Study Results: Photography as art is a powerful protest tool combating misrecognition by publicly highlighting the link between people and place. While the photos highlighted are not maps in a conventional sense, they are ‘cartographic-affective’ because they (re)map the contours of life for otherwise unseen people living in Union Hill and Buckingham County. Conclusion: Cartographic-affect in the featured photographs results in recognitional justice as protesters are not only made public, but reconnected to places from which they were previously erased. In the process, the site of struggle against a petro-hegemony in North Carolina is (re)situated and (re)scaled away from the hegemon's disempowering state and census tract levels toward empowering bodily, community, and national scales.","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Struggle for Recognitional Justice: Cartographic-Affective Resistance to a Proposed Compressor Station in Buckingham County, Virginia\",\"authors\":\"Janeé Petersen, Harold A. Perkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/env.2022.0090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Problem: In 2014, Dominion Energy proposed a large compressor station in Buckingham County, Virginia to pressurize its Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Dominion and regulators presented demographic data that erased African Americans living near the compressor site in the community of Union Hill, to circumvent environmental justice concerns during the permitting process. Theoretical Framing: The erasure of African Americans in Union Hill for the construction of a compressor station was a recognitional injustice. Art is useful for contesting misrecognition by generating affective solidarities among various and dispersed groups of people concerned about injustice. Case Study Design: Qualitative methods are used to study how protestors deploy creativity to overcome misrecognition in Union Hill and Greater Buckingham County, Virginia. We focus, in particular, on two photographic series created to generate affect against the compressor station and pipeline. Case Study Results: Photography as art is a powerful protest tool combating misrecognition by publicly highlighting the link between people and place. While the photos highlighted are not maps in a conventional sense, they are ‘cartographic-affective’ because they (re)map the contours of life for otherwise unseen people living in Union Hill and Buckingham County. Conclusion: Cartographic-affect in the featured photographs results in recognitional justice as protesters are not only made public, but reconnected to places from which they were previously erased. In the process, the site of struggle against a petro-hegemony in North Carolina is (re)situated and (re)scaled away from the hegemon's disempowering state and census tract levels toward empowering bodily, community, and national scales.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Justice\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题:2014年,Dominion Energy公司提议在弗吉尼亚州白金汉县建造一个大型压缩站,为其大西洋沿岸管道加压。Dominion和监管机构提供了人口统计数据,删除了居住在Union Hill社区压缩机站点附近的非裔美国人,以规避许可过程中的环境正义问题。理论框架:为了建设一个压缩站而在联合山抹杀非裔美国人是一种公认的不公正。艺术通过在关注不公正的各种分散群体之间产生情感团结,有助于对抗误解。案例研究设计:定性方法用于研究抗议者如何利用创造力来克服弗吉尼亚州联合山和大白金汉县的误解。我们特别关注两个摄影系列,以产生对压缩站和管道的影响。案例研究结果:摄影作为艺术是一种强大的抗议工具,通过公开强调人与地点之间的联系,来对抗误解。虽然突出显示的照片不是传统意义上的地图,但它们是“具有地图意义的”,因为它们(重新)描绘了生活在联合山和白金汉县的人们的生活轮廓,否则他们就看不到了。结论:特色照片中的地图影响导致了认识上的正义,因为抗议者不仅被公开,而且重新与他们以前被抹去的地方联系起来。在这个过程中,北卡罗来纳反对石油霸权的斗争地点被(重新)定位,并(重新)从霸权的剥夺权力的州和人口普查区层面,向赋予权力的身体、社区和国家层面扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Struggle for Recognitional Justice: Cartographic-Affective Resistance to a Proposed Compressor Station in Buckingham County, Virginia
The Problem: In 2014, Dominion Energy proposed a large compressor station in Buckingham County, Virginia to pressurize its Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Dominion and regulators presented demographic data that erased African Americans living near the compressor site in the community of Union Hill, to circumvent environmental justice concerns during the permitting process. Theoretical Framing: The erasure of African Americans in Union Hill for the construction of a compressor station was a recognitional injustice. Art is useful for contesting misrecognition by generating affective solidarities among various and dispersed groups of people concerned about injustice. Case Study Design: Qualitative methods are used to study how protestors deploy creativity to overcome misrecognition in Union Hill and Greater Buckingham County, Virginia. We focus, in particular, on two photographic series created to generate affect against the compressor station and pipeline. Case Study Results: Photography as art is a powerful protest tool combating misrecognition by publicly highlighting the link between people and place. While the photos highlighted are not maps in a conventional sense, they are ‘cartographic-affective’ because they (re)map the contours of life for otherwise unseen people living in Union Hill and Buckingham County. Conclusion: Cartographic-affect in the featured photographs results in recognitional justice as protesters are not only made public, but reconnected to places from which they were previously erased. In the process, the site of struggle against a petro-hegemony in North Carolina is (re)situated and (re)scaled away from the hegemon's disempowering state and census tract levels toward empowering bodily, community, and national scales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
期刊最新文献
How Sierra Leone Enacted One of the Most Progressive Land, Climate, and Environmental Justice Laws in the World Advancing Environmental Justice in the Community Using Charrette: A Case Study in Boston Chinatown. “People Should Not Have to Live Under These Conditions”: Using Focus Groups to Inform the Development of a Community-Led Intervention Addressing Air Quality and Health Equity Hosting a Market Is Just the First Step: Exploring the Relationship Between Community Characteristics and Farmers Market Size An Environmental Justice Mapping Tools Guide to Understand Available Resources to Increase Access
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1