结构供应链复杂性指数与结构有效性:数据驱动的实证方法

IF 2.7 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Emerging Markets Pub Date : 2023-11-06 DOI:10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0086
Pushpesh Pant, Shantanu Dutta, S.P. Sarmah
{"title":"结构供应链复杂性指数与结构有效性:数据驱动的实证方法","authors":"Pushpesh Pant, Shantanu Dutta, S.P. Sarmah","doi":"10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Given the lack of focus on a standardized measurement framework (e.g. benchmarking tool) to assess and quantify complexity within the supply chain, this study has developed a unified supply chain complexity (SCC) index and validated its utility by examining the relationship with firm performance. More importantly, it examines the role of firm owners' business knowledge, sales strategy and board management on the relationship between SCC and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the unit of analysis is Indian manufacturing companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). This research has merged panel data from two secondary data sources: Bloomberg and Prowess and empirically operationalized five key SCC drivers, namely, number of suppliers, the number of supplier countries, the number of products, the number of plants and the number of customers. The study employs panel data regression analyses to examine the proposed conceptual model and associated hypotheses. Moreover, the present study employs models that incorporate robust standard errors to account for heteroscedasticity. Findings The results show that complexity has a negative and significant effect on firm performance. Further, the study reveals that an owner's business knowledge and the firm's effective sales strategy and board management can significantly lessen the negative effect of SCC. Originality/value This study develops an SCC index and validates its utility. Also, it presents a novel idea to operationalize the measure for SCC characteristics using secondary databases like Prowess and Bloomberg.","PeriodicalId":47381,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","volume":"49 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural supply chain complexity index and construct validity: a data-driven empirical approach\",\"authors\":\"Pushpesh Pant, Shantanu Dutta, S.P. Sarmah\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Given the lack of focus on a standardized measurement framework (e.g. benchmarking tool) to assess and quantify complexity within the supply chain, this study has developed a unified supply chain complexity (SCC) index and validated its utility by examining the relationship with firm performance. More importantly, it examines the role of firm owners' business knowledge, sales strategy and board management on the relationship between SCC and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the unit of analysis is Indian manufacturing companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). This research has merged panel data from two secondary data sources: Bloomberg and Prowess and empirically operationalized five key SCC drivers, namely, number of suppliers, the number of supplier countries, the number of products, the number of plants and the number of customers. The study employs panel data regression analyses to examine the proposed conceptual model and associated hypotheses. Moreover, the present study employs models that incorporate robust standard errors to account for heteroscedasticity. Findings The results show that complexity has a negative and significant effect on firm performance. Further, the study reveals that an owner's business knowledge and the firm's effective sales strategy and board management can significantly lessen the negative effect of SCC. Originality/value This study develops an SCC index and validates its utility. Also, it presents a novel idea to operationalize the measure for SCC characteristics using secondary databases like Prowess and Bloomberg.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emerging Markets\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emerging Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Markets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoem-01-2023-0086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于缺乏对评估和量化供应链复杂性的标准化测量框架(例如基准工具)的关注,本研究开发了统一的供应链复杂性(SCC)指数,并通过检查与企业绩效的关系来验证其效用。更重要的是,它考察了企业所有者的商业知识,销售策略和董事会管理在SCC与企业绩效之间的关系中的作用。在本研究中,分析单位是在孟买证券交易所(BSE)上市的印度制造业公司。本研究合并了来自两个二手数据源的面板数据:彭博和威力,并实证操作了五个关键的SCC驱动因素,即供应商数量、供应商国家数量、产品数量、工厂数量和客户数量。本研究采用面板数据回归分析来检验所提出的概念模型和相关假设。此外,本研究采用了包含稳健标准误差的模型来解释异方差。结果表明,复杂性对企业绩效有显著的负向影响。此外,研究还发现,所有者的商业知识、公司有效的销售策略和董事会管理可以显著降低企业高管行为的负面影响。原创性/价值本研究开发了一个SCC指数并验证了它的实用性。此外,它还提出了一个新颖的想法,即使用二级数据库(如威力和彭博)来操作SCC特征的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structural supply chain complexity index and construct validity: a data-driven empirical approach
Purpose Given the lack of focus on a standardized measurement framework (e.g. benchmarking tool) to assess and quantify complexity within the supply chain, this study has developed a unified supply chain complexity (SCC) index and validated its utility by examining the relationship with firm performance. More importantly, it examines the role of firm owners' business knowledge, sales strategy and board management on the relationship between SCC and firm performance. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the unit of analysis is Indian manufacturing companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE). This research has merged panel data from two secondary data sources: Bloomberg and Prowess and empirically operationalized five key SCC drivers, namely, number of suppliers, the number of supplier countries, the number of products, the number of plants and the number of customers. The study employs panel data regression analyses to examine the proposed conceptual model and associated hypotheses. Moreover, the present study employs models that incorporate robust standard errors to account for heteroscedasticity. Findings The results show that complexity has a negative and significant effect on firm performance. Further, the study reveals that an owner's business knowledge and the firm's effective sales strategy and board management can significantly lessen the negative effect of SCC. Originality/value This study develops an SCC index and validates its utility. Also, it presents a novel idea to operationalize the measure for SCC characteristics using secondary databases like Prowess and Bloomberg.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
206
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of aggregate and sectoral time-varying market efficiency in the Russian stock market during the COVID-19 outbreak and the Russia–Ukraine conflict (RUC) Run, not walk: advanced red queen effect and mutual forbearance effect in multimarket contact Revisiting oil-stock nexus in the time of health crisis: a wavelet approach Rhetorical strategies in the climate change disclosures of Bangladeshi banking companies Exploring panic buying as a situational response – the role of fear, media exposure and context-specific paranoia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1