彩虹与泥:LGBTQ+代际关怀的实验

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Signs Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1086/725841
Karen A. Morris, Adam J. Greteman, Nic M. Weststrate
{"title":"彩虹与泥:LGBTQ+代际关怀的实验","authors":"Karen A. Morris, Adam J. Greteman, Nic M. Weststrate","doi":"10.1086/725841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While an increasing awareness of the economic, legal, emotional, social, and physical precarity of LGBTQ+ people has sparked new laws, policies, and medical and social services, their epistemic needs are just as urgent. For many decades, young people growing up in the United States have been systematically denied access to LGBTQ+ histories, knowledges, and older adults through homophobic and transphobic gatekeeping within education, community, and family networks. As a result, LGBTQ+ folks come of age in relative social isolation, lacking tools to understand their experiences within broader sociohistorical contexts and recognition from others as valuable sources of knowledge. In this article, we explore the complexities of epistemic care as relational work designed to counter legacies of injustice through The LGBTQ+ Intergenerational Dialogue Project. The project—a partnership between an LGBTQ+ community center, an art and design college, and a public research university—brings together racially, socioeconomically, and gender-diverse cohorts of LGBTQ+ younger (eighteen to twenty-nine years old) and older adults (sixty-two to eighty-four years old) for dialogue, art making, and shared meals. Over time, it has evolved as a collaborative hybrid pedagogical/research experiment in which participants become partners in education, community formation, and knowledge production. Interweaving ethnographic narrative from dialogues with theoretical discussion, we connect our work to earlier feminist and gay liberation consciousness-raising practices (1960s–80s) and feminist and queer scholarship on care ethics in both education and research methodologies to think about epistemic justice work as a form of collective self-care.","PeriodicalId":51382,"journal":{"name":"Signs","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rainbows and Mud: Experiments in LGBTQ+ Intergenerational Care\",\"authors\":\"Karen A. Morris, Adam J. Greteman, Nic M. Weststrate\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While an increasing awareness of the economic, legal, emotional, social, and physical precarity of LGBTQ+ people has sparked new laws, policies, and medical and social services, their epistemic needs are just as urgent. For many decades, young people growing up in the United States have been systematically denied access to LGBTQ+ histories, knowledges, and older adults through homophobic and transphobic gatekeeping within education, community, and family networks. As a result, LGBTQ+ folks come of age in relative social isolation, lacking tools to understand their experiences within broader sociohistorical contexts and recognition from others as valuable sources of knowledge. In this article, we explore the complexities of epistemic care as relational work designed to counter legacies of injustice through The LGBTQ+ Intergenerational Dialogue Project. The project—a partnership between an LGBTQ+ community center, an art and design college, and a public research university—brings together racially, socioeconomically, and gender-diverse cohorts of LGBTQ+ younger (eighteen to twenty-nine years old) and older adults (sixty-two to eighty-four years old) for dialogue, art making, and shared meals. Over time, it has evolved as a collaborative hybrid pedagogical/research experiment in which participants become partners in education, community formation, and knowledge production. Interweaving ethnographic narrative from dialogues with theoretical discussion, we connect our work to earlier feminist and gay liberation consciousness-raising practices (1960s–80s) and feminist and queer scholarship on care ethics in both education and research methodologies to think about epistemic justice work as a form of collective self-care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signs\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725841\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725841","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管人们对LGBTQ+人群在经济、法律、情感、社会和身体上的不稳定性的认识日益增强,催生了新的法律、政策以及医疗和社会服务,但他们的认知需求同样迫切。几十年来,在美国长大的年轻人一直被系统性地拒绝接触LGBTQ+的历史、知识和老年人,因为在教育、社区和家庭网络中有恐同和恐跨的把关。因此,LGBTQ+人群在相对孤立的社会环境中长大,缺乏在更广泛的社会历史背景下理解他们的经历的工具,也没有被他人认可为有价值的知识来源。在本文中,我们通过LGBTQ+代际对话项目探讨了认知关怀作为关系工作的复杂性,旨在对抗不公正的遗产。这个项目是一个LGBTQ+社区中心、一所艺术设计学院和一所公立研究型大学之间的合作项目,它将种族、社会经济和性别不同的LGBTQ+年轻人(18岁至29岁)和老年人(62岁至84岁)聚集在一起,进行对话、艺术创作和共享食物。随着时间的推移,它已经发展成为一种协作式的混合教学/研究实验,参与者成为教育、社区形成和知识生产的合作伙伴。我们将对话中的民族志叙述与理论讨论交织在一起,将我们的工作与早期女权主义者和同性恋解放意识提升实践(20世纪60年代至80年代)以及女权主义者和酷儿学者在教育和研究方法中的关怀伦理联系起来,以思考作为集体自我关怀形式的认知正义工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rainbows and Mud: Experiments in LGBTQ+ Intergenerational Care
While an increasing awareness of the economic, legal, emotional, social, and physical precarity of LGBTQ+ people has sparked new laws, policies, and medical and social services, their epistemic needs are just as urgent. For many decades, young people growing up in the United States have been systematically denied access to LGBTQ+ histories, knowledges, and older adults through homophobic and transphobic gatekeeping within education, community, and family networks. As a result, LGBTQ+ folks come of age in relative social isolation, lacking tools to understand their experiences within broader sociohistorical contexts and recognition from others as valuable sources of knowledge. In this article, we explore the complexities of epistemic care as relational work designed to counter legacies of injustice through The LGBTQ+ Intergenerational Dialogue Project. The project—a partnership between an LGBTQ+ community center, an art and design college, and a public research university—brings together racially, socioeconomically, and gender-diverse cohorts of LGBTQ+ younger (eighteen to twenty-nine years old) and older adults (sixty-two to eighty-four years old) for dialogue, art making, and shared meals. Over time, it has evolved as a collaborative hybrid pedagogical/research experiment in which participants become partners in education, community formation, and knowledge production. Interweaving ethnographic narrative from dialogues with theoretical discussion, we connect our work to earlier feminist and gay liberation consciousness-raising practices (1960s–80s) and feminist and queer scholarship on care ethics in both education and research methodologies to think about epistemic justice work as a form of collective self-care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Signs
Signs WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading international journal in women"s studies, Signs has since 1975 been at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. Signs publishes pathbreaking articles of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and/or sexuality either as central focuses or as constitutive analytics; symposia engaging comparative, interdisciplinary perspectives from around the globe to analyze concepts and topics of import to feminist scholarship; retrospectives that track the growth and development of feminist scholarship, note transformations in key concepts and methodologies, and construct genealogies of feminist inquiry; and new directions essays, which provide an overview of the main themes, controversies.
期刊最新文献
Connective Labor as Emotional Vocabulary: Inequality, Mutuality, and the Politics of Feelings in Care-Work Acuerpar: The Decolonial Feminist Call for Embodied Solidarity About the Contributors Challenging the Antipolitics of Regimes of Care: Young African Men in Italy Resist Precarious Futures Victory or Defeat? The Dilemma of Palliative Schooling in an Era of Racial Equity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1