监督人工智能的人类-优化错误检测的设计调查

IF 2.8 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Journal of Decision Systems Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1080/12460125.2023.2260518
Marvin Braun, Maike Greve, Alfred Benedikt Brendel, Lutz M. Kolbe
{"title":"监督人工智能的人类-优化错误检测的设计调查","authors":"Marvin Braun, Maike Greve, Alfred Benedikt Brendel, Lutz M. Kolbe","doi":"10.1080/12460125.2023.2260518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTArtificial Intelligence (AI) fundamentally changes the way we work by introducing new capabilities. Human tasks shift towards a supervising role where the human confirms or disconfirms the presented decision. In this study, we utilise the signal detection theory to investigate and explain how the performance of human error detection is influenced by specific information design. We conducted two online experiments in the context of AI-supported information extraction and measured the ability of participants to validate the extracted information. In the first experiment, we investigated the mechanism of information provided prior to conducting the error detection task. In the second experiment, we manipulated the design of the presented information during the task and investigated its effect. Both manipulations significantly impacted the error detection performance of humans. Hence our study provides important insights for developing AI-based decision support systems and contributes to the theoretical understanding of human-AI collaboration.KEYWORDS: Supervisionartificial intelligenceerror detectiondecision makingsignal detection theory AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge that a previous version of study 2 has received valuable feedback on the European Conference on Information Systems 2022.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics statementThe present research constitutes a non-interventional study, specifically focused on surveys and data analysis, wherein no direct intervention, manipulation, or experimentation on human participants is involved. As a result, this study falls under the category where ethical approval is not required.","PeriodicalId":45565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Decision Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Humans supervising Artificial intelligence – Investigation of Designs to optimize error detection\",\"authors\":\"Marvin Braun, Maike Greve, Alfred Benedikt Brendel, Lutz M. Kolbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12460125.2023.2260518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTArtificial Intelligence (AI) fundamentally changes the way we work by introducing new capabilities. Human tasks shift towards a supervising role where the human confirms or disconfirms the presented decision. In this study, we utilise the signal detection theory to investigate and explain how the performance of human error detection is influenced by specific information design. We conducted two online experiments in the context of AI-supported information extraction and measured the ability of participants to validate the extracted information. In the first experiment, we investigated the mechanism of information provided prior to conducting the error detection task. In the second experiment, we manipulated the design of the presented information during the task and investigated its effect. Both manipulations significantly impacted the error detection performance of humans. Hence our study provides important insights for developing AI-based decision support systems and contributes to the theoretical understanding of human-AI collaboration.KEYWORDS: Supervisionartificial intelligenceerror detectiondecision makingsignal detection theory AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge that a previous version of study 2 has received valuable feedback on the European Conference on Information Systems 2022.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics statementThe present research constitutes a non-interventional study, specifically focused on surveys and data analysis, wherein no direct intervention, manipulation, or experimentation on human participants is involved. As a result, this study falls under the category where ethical approval is not required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Decision Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Decision Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2260518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Decision Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2260518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)通过引入新功能从根本上改变了我们的工作方式。人工任务转变为监督角色,在这个角色中,人类确认或不确认所提出的决策。在这项研究中,我们利用信号检测理论来研究和解释人为错误检测的性能如何受到特定信息设计的影响。我们在人工智能支持的信息提取的背景下进行了两个在线实验,并测量了参与者验证提取信息的能力。在第一个实验中,我们研究了在执行错误检测任务之前提供信息的机制。在第二个实验中,我们在任务中操纵呈现信息的设计,并研究其效果。这两种操作都显著影响了人类的错误检测性能。因此,我们的研究为开发基于人工智能的决策支持系统提供了重要的见解,并有助于从理论上理解人类与人工智能的协作。关键词:监督人工智能错误检测决策信号检测理论致谢我们承认,研究2的前一个版本已经收到了2022年欧洲信息系统会议的宝贵反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究是一项非干预性研究,特别侧重于调查和数据分析,其中不涉及对人类参与者的直接干预、操纵或实验。因此,这项研究属于不需要伦理批准的范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Humans supervising Artificial intelligence – Investigation of Designs to optimize error detection
ABSTRACTArtificial Intelligence (AI) fundamentally changes the way we work by introducing new capabilities. Human tasks shift towards a supervising role where the human confirms or disconfirms the presented decision. In this study, we utilise the signal detection theory to investigate and explain how the performance of human error detection is influenced by specific information design. We conducted two online experiments in the context of AI-supported information extraction and measured the ability of participants to validate the extracted information. In the first experiment, we investigated the mechanism of information provided prior to conducting the error detection task. In the second experiment, we manipulated the design of the presented information during the task and investigated its effect. Both manipulations significantly impacted the error detection performance of humans. Hence our study provides important insights for developing AI-based decision support systems and contributes to the theoretical understanding of human-AI collaboration.KEYWORDS: Supervisionartificial intelligenceerror detectiondecision makingsignal detection theory AcknowledgmentsWe acknowledge that a previous version of study 2 has received valuable feedback on the European Conference on Information Systems 2022.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Ethics statementThe present research constitutes a non-interventional study, specifically focused on surveys and data analysis, wherein no direct intervention, manipulation, or experimentation on human participants is involved. As a result, this study falls under the category where ethical approval is not required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Decision Systems
Journal of Decision Systems OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Decision support for traffic safety: case of rear-end collision modelling Machine learning-based empirical investigation of user’s perception of digitalisation in pandemic immunisation programs Exploring the PhD supervisor/candidate relationship for a ‘publication-based thesis’: a metaphor-driven approach Living in the tension: an organisational decision-making framework and paradigm Literature review of food insecurity in the Sahel from an interdisciplinary perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1