在 COVID-19 大流行期间,伊朗国家脊髓损伤登记处对脊柱创伤患者进行出院后随访:挑战与经验教训

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Chinese Journal of Traumatology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.10.005
Zahra Azadmanjir , Moein Khormali , Mohsen Sadeghi-Naini , Vali Baigi , Habibollah Pirnejad , Mohammad Dashtkoohi , Zahra Ghodsi , Seyed Behnam Jazayeri , Aidin Shakeri , Mahdi Mohammadzadeh , Laleh Bagheri , Mohammad-Sajjad Lotfi , Salman Daliri , Amir Azarhomayoun , Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani , Gerard O'reilly , Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,伊朗国家脊髓损伤登记处对脊柱创伤患者进行出院后随访:挑战与经验教训","authors":"Zahra Azadmanjir ,&nbsp;Moein Khormali ,&nbsp;Mohsen Sadeghi-Naini ,&nbsp;Vali Baigi ,&nbsp;Habibollah Pirnejad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Dashtkoohi ,&nbsp;Zahra Ghodsi ,&nbsp;Seyed Behnam Jazayeri ,&nbsp;Aidin Shakeri ,&nbsp;Mahdi Mohammadzadeh ,&nbsp;Laleh Bagheri ,&nbsp;Mohammad-Sajjad Lotfi ,&nbsp;Salman Daliri ,&nbsp;Amir Azarhomayoun ,&nbsp;Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani ,&nbsp;Gerard O'reilly ,&nbsp;Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) is to create an infrastructure to assess the quality of care for spine trauma and in this study, we aim to investigate whether the NSCIR-IR successfully provides necessary post-discharge follow-up data for these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational prospective study was conducted from April 11, 2021 to April 22, 2022 in 8 centers enrolled in NSCIR-IR, respectively Arak, Rasht, Urmia, Shahroud, Yazd, Kashan, Tabriz, and Tehran. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on their need for care resources, respectively: (1) non-spinal cord injury (SCI) patients without surgery (group 1), (2) non-SCI patients with surgery (group 2), and (3) SCI patients (group 3). The assessment tool was a self-designed questionnaire to evaluate the care quality in 3 phases: pre-hospital, in-hospital, and post-hospital. The data from the first 2 phases were collected through the registry. The post-hospital data were collected by conducting follow-up assessments. Telephone follow-ups were conducted for groups 1 and 2 (non-SCI patients), while group 3 (SCI patients) had a face-to-face visit. This study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on age and time interval from injury to follow-up were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and response rate and follow-up loss as a percentage.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Altogether 1538 telephone follow-up records related to 1292 patients were registered in the NSCIR-IR. Of the total calls, 918 (71.05%) were related to successful follow-ups, but 38 cases died and thus were excluded from data analysis. In the end, post-hospital data from 880 patients alive were gathered. The success rate of follow-ups by telephone for groups 1 and 2 was 73.38% and 67.05% respectively, compared to 66.67% by face-to-face visits for group 3, which was very hard during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data completion rate after discharge ranged from 48% – 100%, 22% – 100% and 29% – 100% for groups 1 – 3.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>To improve patient accessibility, NSCIR-IR should take measures during data gathering to increase the accuracy of registered contact information. Regarding the loss to follow-ups of SCI patients, NSCIR-IR should find strategies for remote assessment or motivate them to participate in follow-ups through, for example, providing transportation facilities or financial support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 173-179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001153/pdfft?md5=013ac9d4d6faae18f79cbcd2c71e60fb&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523001153-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-discharge follow-up of patients with spine trauma in the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and lessons learned\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Azadmanjir ,&nbsp;Moein Khormali ,&nbsp;Mohsen Sadeghi-Naini ,&nbsp;Vali Baigi ,&nbsp;Habibollah Pirnejad ,&nbsp;Mohammad Dashtkoohi ,&nbsp;Zahra Ghodsi ,&nbsp;Seyed Behnam Jazayeri ,&nbsp;Aidin Shakeri ,&nbsp;Mahdi Mohammadzadeh ,&nbsp;Laleh Bagheri ,&nbsp;Mohammad-Sajjad Lotfi ,&nbsp;Salman Daliri ,&nbsp;Amir Azarhomayoun ,&nbsp;Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani ,&nbsp;Gerard O'reilly ,&nbsp;Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) is to create an infrastructure to assess the quality of care for spine trauma and in this study, we aim to investigate whether the NSCIR-IR successfully provides necessary post-discharge follow-up data for these patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational prospective study was conducted from April 11, 2021 to April 22, 2022 in 8 centers enrolled in NSCIR-IR, respectively Arak, Rasht, Urmia, Shahroud, Yazd, Kashan, Tabriz, and Tehran. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on their need for care resources, respectively: (1) non-spinal cord injury (SCI) patients without surgery (group 1), (2) non-SCI patients with surgery (group 2), and (3) SCI patients (group 3). The assessment tool was a self-designed questionnaire to evaluate the care quality in 3 phases: pre-hospital, in-hospital, and post-hospital. The data from the first 2 phases were collected through the registry. The post-hospital data were collected by conducting follow-up assessments. Telephone follow-ups were conducted for groups 1 and 2 (non-SCI patients), while group 3 (SCI patients) had a face-to-face visit. This study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on age and time interval from injury to follow-up were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and response rate and follow-up loss as a percentage.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Altogether 1538 telephone follow-up records related to 1292 patients were registered in the NSCIR-IR. Of the total calls, 918 (71.05%) were related to successful follow-ups, but 38 cases died and thus were excluded from data analysis. In the end, post-hospital data from 880 patients alive were gathered. The success rate of follow-ups by telephone for groups 1 and 2 was 73.38% and 67.05% respectively, compared to 66.67% by face-to-face visits for group 3, which was very hard during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data completion rate after discharge ranged from 48% – 100%, 22% – 100% and 29% – 100% for groups 1 – 3.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>To improve patient accessibility, NSCIR-IR should take measures during data gathering to increase the accuracy of registered contact information. Regarding the loss to follow-ups of SCI patients, NSCIR-IR should find strategies for remote assessment or motivate them to participate in follow-ups through, for example, providing transportation facilities or financial support.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 173-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001153/pdfft?md5=013ac9d4d6faae18f79cbcd2c71e60fb&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523001153-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001153\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523001153","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的伊朗国家脊髓损伤登记处(NSCIR-IR)旨在建立一个评估脊柱创伤护理质量的基础设施,在本研究中,我们旨在调查 NSCIR-IR 是否成功地为这些患者提供了必要的出院后随访数据。方法从 2021 年 4 月 11 日至 2022 年 4 月 22 日,我们在加入 NSCIR-IR 的 8 个中心(分别是阿拉克、拉什特、乌尔米耶、沙赫鲁德、亚兹德、卡尚、大不里士和德黑兰)开展了一项前瞻性观察研究。根据患者对护理资源的需求将其分为三组:(1) 未接受手术的非脊髓损伤 (SCI) 患者(第一组),(2) 接受手术的非 SCI 患者(第二组),(3) SCI 患者(第三组)。评估工具是一份自行设计的问卷,用于评估院前、院内和院后三个阶段的护理质量。前两个阶段的数据通过登记处收集。入院后的数据则通过随访评估收集。第 1 组和第 2 组(非 SCI 患者)采用电话随访,第 3 组(SCI 患者)采用面对面随访。这项研究是在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的。年龄和从受伤到随访的时间间隔数据以平均值±标准差(SD)表示,回复率和随访损失率以百分比表示。在所有电话中,有 918 次(71.05%)是成功的随访,但有 38 例死亡,因此被排除在数据分析之外。最终,收集到了 880 名存活患者的院后数据。第 1 组和第 2 组的电话随访成功率分别为 73.38% 和 67.05%,而第 3 组的面对面随访成功率为 66.67%,这在 COVID-19 大流行期间是非常困难的。结论为提高患者的可及性,NSCIR-IR 应在数据收集过程中采取措施,提高登记联系信息的准确性。关于SCI患者失去随访的问题,NSCIR-IR应寻找远程评估策略,或通过提供交通设施或经济支持等方式激励他们参与随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-discharge follow-up of patients with spine trauma in the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and lessons learned

Purpose

The purpose of the National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) is to create an infrastructure to assess the quality of care for spine trauma and in this study, we aim to investigate whether the NSCIR-IR successfully provides necessary post-discharge follow-up data for these patients.

Methods

An observational prospective study was conducted from April 11, 2021 to April 22, 2022 in 8 centers enrolled in NSCIR-IR, respectively Arak, Rasht, Urmia, Shahroud, Yazd, Kashan, Tabriz, and Tehran. Patients were classified into 3 groups based on their need for care resources, respectively: (1) non-spinal cord injury (SCI) patients without surgery (group 1), (2) non-SCI patients with surgery (group 2), and (3) SCI patients (group 3). The assessment tool was a self-designed questionnaire to evaluate the care quality in 3 phases: pre-hospital, in-hospital, and post-hospital. The data from the first 2 phases were collected through the registry. The post-hospital data were collected by conducting follow-up assessments. Telephone follow-ups were conducted for groups 1 and 2 (non-SCI patients), while group 3 (SCI patients) had a face-to-face visit. This study took place during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on age and time interval from injury to follow-up were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and response rate and follow-up loss as a percentage.

Results

Altogether 1538 telephone follow-up records related to 1292 patients were registered in the NSCIR-IR. Of the total calls, 918 (71.05%) were related to successful follow-ups, but 38 cases died and thus were excluded from data analysis. In the end, post-hospital data from 880 patients alive were gathered. The success rate of follow-ups by telephone for groups 1 and 2 was 73.38% and 67.05% respectively, compared to 66.67% by face-to-face visits for group 3, which was very hard during the COVID-19 pandemic. The data completion rate after discharge ranged from 48% – 100%, 22% – 100% and 29% – 100% for groups 1 – 3.

Conclusions

To improve patient accessibility, NSCIR-IR should take measures during data gathering to increase the accuracy of registered contact information. Regarding the loss to follow-ups of SCI patients, NSCIR-IR should find strategies for remote assessment or motivate them to participate in follow-ups through, for example, providing transportation facilities or financial support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1707
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of conventional biplanar and triangulation method for sacroiliac screw placement in the treatment of unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures: A real-world retrospective cohort study. How does attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder affect driving behavior components? Baseline findings from Persian traffic cohort. Multiomics analysis elucidated the role of inflammatory response and bile acid metabolism disturbance in electric shock-induced liver injury in mice. Two cases of complex traumatic aortic dissection combined with multiple organ injuries. Evaluating the effectiveness of immediate vs. elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt thoracic aortic injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1