奥陶纪晚期Bohdalec地层(捷克共和国,布拉格盆地,卡提安)中的雪莱状桡足类捕食记录

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q2 PALEONTOLOGY Geobios Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.geobios.2023.09.001
Russell D.C. Bicknell , Jana Bruthansová , Julien Kimmig
{"title":"奥陶纪晚期Bohdalec地层(捷克共和国,布拉格盆地,卡提安)中的雪莱状桡足类捕食记录","authors":"Russell D.C. Bicknell ,&nbsp;Jana Bruthansová ,&nbsp;Julien Kimmig","doi":"10.1016/j.geobios.2023.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Trace fossils<span> can illustrate important palaeobiological interactions within a fossil assemblage that body fossils do not record. A group of trace fossils that showcase feeding ecology, and evidence of predation, are </span></span>coprolites. Shelly coprolites are useful for documenting records of durophagous predators or scavengers within a substrate. To expand the record of these traces from the lower Paleozoic, here we present 12 shelly coprolites from the </span>Late Ordovician (Katian) Bohdalec Formation of the Czech Republic. These coprolites contain abundant </span><em>Onnia superba</em> (<span>Bancroft, 1929</span><span>) fragments with marked breakages across exoskeletal sections. Rarer evidence for gastropods, bivalves, crinoid debris, and another indeterminate shelly material are also observed within the coprolites. While the producer cannot be irrevocably determined, possible options are explored. We propose that larger, co-occurring trilobites and predatory cephalopods likely made the majority of coprolites. Furthermore, large unbiomineralised arthropods, such as phyllocarids and eurypterids are highlighted as possible producers. Continued examination of these trace fossils will highlight when and where similar interactions between trophic levels had occurred.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55116,"journal":{"name":"Geobios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shelly coprolites record durophagous predation in the Late Ordovician Bohdalec Formation (Katian; Prague Basin, Czech Republic)\",\"authors\":\"Russell D.C. Bicknell ,&nbsp;Jana Bruthansová ,&nbsp;Julien Kimmig\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geobios.2023.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Trace fossils<span> can illustrate important palaeobiological interactions within a fossil assemblage that body fossils do not record. A group of trace fossils that showcase feeding ecology, and evidence of predation, are </span></span>coprolites. Shelly coprolites are useful for documenting records of durophagous predators or scavengers within a substrate. To expand the record of these traces from the lower Paleozoic, here we present 12 shelly coprolites from the </span>Late Ordovician (Katian) Bohdalec Formation of the Czech Republic. These coprolites contain abundant </span><em>Onnia superba</em> (<span>Bancroft, 1929</span><span>) fragments with marked breakages across exoskeletal sections. Rarer evidence for gastropods, bivalves, crinoid debris, and another indeterminate shelly material are also observed within the coprolites. While the producer cannot be irrevocably determined, possible options are explored. We propose that larger, co-occurring trilobites and predatory cephalopods likely made the majority of coprolites. Furthermore, large unbiomineralised arthropods, such as phyllocarids and eurypterids are highlighted as possible producers. Continued examination of these trace fossils will highlight when and where similar interactions between trophic levels had occurred.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geobios\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geobios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016699523001067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PALEONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geobios","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016699523001067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

痕量化石可以说明化石群中重要的古生物学相互作用,而身体化石却无法记录这些相互作用。桡骨化石是一类可以展示摄食生态学和捕食证据的痕迹化石。鞘状桡足石有助于记录基质中的食肉动物或食腐动物。为了扩大下古生界对这些痕迹的记录,我们在此展示了来自捷克共和国晚奥陶世(卡蒂安)Bohdalec地层的12块壳状桡足石。这些桡骨岩含有大量的超级翁牛(Onnia superba)(班克罗夫特,1929 年)碎片,外骨骼部分有明显的断裂。在这些桡骨岩中还发现了腹足类、双壳类、皱皮类碎屑和另一种不确定的壳质材料。虽然无法确定生产者,但我们探讨了可能的选择。我们认为,大部分桡裂石很可能是大型三叶虫和捕食性头足类动物共同制造的。此外,我们还强调了大型非矿物化节肢动物,如侏罗纪动物和极龙类,也是可能的制造者。对这些痕量化石的继续研究将凸显出营养级之间发生类似互动的时间和地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shelly coprolites record durophagous predation in the Late Ordovician Bohdalec Formation (Katian; Prague Basin, Czech Republic)

Trace fossils can illustrate important palaeobiological interactions within a fossil assemblage that body fossils do not record. A group of trace fossils that showcase feeding ecology, and evidence of predation, are coprolites. Shelly coprolites are useful for documenting records of durophagous predators or scavengers within a substrate. To expand the record of these traces from the lower Paleozoic, here we present 12 shelly coprolites from the Late Ordovician (Katian) Bohdalec Formation of the Czech Republic. These coprolites contain abundant Onnia superba (Bancroft, 1929) fragments with marked breakages across exoskeletal sections. Rarer evidence for gastropods, bivalves, crinoid debris, and another indeterminate shelly material are also observed within the coprolites. While the producer cannot be irrevocably determined, possible options are explored. We propose that larger, co-occurring trilobites and predatory cephalopods likely made the majority of coprolites. Furthermore, large unbiomineralised arthropods, such as phyllocarids and eurypterids are highlighted as possible producers. Continued examination of these trace fossils will highlight when and where similar interactions between trophic levels had occurred.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geobios
Geobios 地学-古生物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geobios publishes bimonthly in English original peer-reviewed articles of international interest in any area of paleontology, paleobiology, paleoecology, paleobiogeography, (bio)stratigraphy and biogeochemistry. All taxonomic groups are treated, including microfossils, invertebrates, plants, vertebrates and ichnofossils. Geobios welcomes descriptive papers based on original material (e.g. large Systematic Paleontology works), as well as more analytically and/or methodologically oriented papers, provided they offer strong and significant biochronological/biostratigraphical, paleobiogeographical, paleobiological and/or phylogenetic new insights and perspectices. A high priority level is given to synchronic and/or diachronic studies based on multi- or inter-disciplinary approaches mixing various fields of Earth and Life Sciences. Works based on extant data are also considered, provided they offer significant insights into geological-time studies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Biostratigraphic, palaeoenvironmental and palaeobiogeographic implications of bryozoan fauna from the Upper Devonian sequences of Armenia Biogeographical patterns of the porcelaneous larger foraminifer Alveolinella quoyi through the integration of fossil data Conifer fossil woods from the Upper Cretaceous (Neuquén Group) of Mendoza Province, Argentina Updating the fauna and age of the Neogene-Quaternary large mammal sites of Greece
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1