快乐的素养:回应公共教育研究与实践中的认知不公

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Studies Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1080/00131946.2023.2266537
Jessica E. Masterson, Amir A. Gilmore, Roxanne E. Moore
{"title":"快乐的素养:回应公共教育研究与实践中的认知不公","authors":"Jessica E. Masterson, Amir A. Gilmore, Roxanne E. Moore","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2266537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this article, the authors utilize Miranda Fricker’s conception of epistemic injustice to reexamine racial inequities in public education through the lens of testimonial and hermeneutical injustices experienced by minoritized youth. Drawing on their lived experiences as BIPOC researchers and teacher educators, the authors delineate the concept of literacies of joy as a means to describe, document, and affirm minoritized youths’ creative resistance to the epistemic injustices inherent within oppressive educational systems and structures. These literacies of joy are defined as ways of being and knowing that enable BIPOC students and educators alike to reap, enact, and embody joy amid oppressive circumstances. By centering joy, we overtly link this work to expressions of mattering and survivance. By centering literacies, we call attention to the systematicity and grammar of these ways of mattering. Literacies of joy affirm and honor the profound creativity and ingenuity with which oppressed communities have carved out spaces of joy since time immemorial. To this end, this concept addresses a hermeneutical injustice of its own. The implications of these literacies of joy are discussed as means of anti-oppressive pathways to educational research and teaching. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We employ this acronym as an adjective to denote the many racially minoritized communities described therein. While others may use related acronyms (e.g., BISOC to describe students or BITOC to describe teachers belonging to these groups), we exclusively use BIPOC throughout this piece for the sake of clarity.","PeriodicalId":47443,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literacies of Joy: Responding to Epistemic Injustice in Public Education Research and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Jessica E. Masterson, Amir A. Gilmore, Roxanne E. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131946.2023.2266537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractIn this article, the authors utilize Miranda Fricker’s conception of epistemic injustice to reexamine racial inequities in public education through the lens of testimonial and hermeneutical injustices experienced by minoritized youth. Drawing on their lived experiences as BIPOC researchers and teacher educators, the authors delineate the concept of literacies of joy as a means to describe, document, and affirm minoritized youths’ creative resistance to the epistemic injustices inherent within oppressive educational systems and structures. These literacies of joy are defined as ways of being and knowing that enable BIPOC students and educators alike to reap, enact, and embody joy amid oppressive circumstances. By centering joy, we overtly link this work to expressions of mattering and survivance. By centering literacies, we call attention to the systematicity and grammar of these ways of mattering. Literacies of joy affirm and honor the profound creativity and ingenuity with which oppressed communities have carved out spaces of joy since time immemorial. To this end, this concept addresses a hermeneutical injustice of its own. The implications of these literacies of joy are discussed as means of anti-oppressive pathways to educational research and teaching. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We employ this acronym as an adjective to denote the many racially minoritized communities described therein. While others may use related acronyms (e.g., BISOC to describe students or BITOC to describe teachers belonging to these groups), we exclusively use BIPOC throughout this piece for the sake of clarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2266537\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2266537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在本文中,作者利用米兰达·弗里克(Miranda Fricker)的认知不公正概念,通过少数族裔青年经历的证词和解释性不公正的镜头,重新审视公共教育中的种族不平等。根据他们作为BIPOC研究人员和教师教育者的生活经验,作者描绘了快乐素养的概念,作为一种描述、记录和肯定少数民族青年对压迫性教育系统和结构中固有的认知不公正的创造性抵抗的手段。这些快乐的素养被定义为存在和认识的方式,使BIPOC的学生和教育工作者都能在压抑的环境中收获、制定和体现快乐。通过以喜悦为中心,我们公开地将这项工作与重要和生存的表达联系起来。通过以识字为中心,我们呼吁人们注意这些方式的系统性和语法性。关于快乐的文字肯定并尊重自古以来受压迫的社区创造快乐空间的深刻创造力和独创性。为此,这个概念解决了它自己的解释学上的不公正。这些快乐素养的含义被讨论为教育研究和教学的反压迫途径的手段。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1:我们用这个首字母缩略词作为形容词来表示其中描述的许多少数民族社区。虽然其他人可能会使用相关的缩写词(例如,BISOC来描述学生或BITOC来描述属于这些群体的教师),但为了清晰起见,我们在本文中只使用BIPOC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literacies of Joy: Responding to Epistemic Injustice in Public Education Research and Practice
AbstractIn this article, the authors utilize Miranda Fricker’s conception of epistemic injustice to reexamine racial inequities in public education through the lens of testimonial and hermeneutical injustices experienced by minoritized youth. Drawing on their lived experiences as BIPOC researchers and teacher educators, the authors delineate the concept of literacies of joy as a means to describe, document, and affirm minoritized youths’ creative resistance to the epistemic injustices inherent within oppressive educational systems and structures. These literacies of joy are defined as ways of being and knowing that enable BIPOC students and educators alike to reap, enact, and embody joy amid oppressive circumstances. By centering joy, we overtly link this work to expressions of mattering and survivance. By centering literacies, we call attention to the systematicity and grammar of these ways of mattering. Literacies of joy affirm and honor the profound creativity and ingenuity with which oppressed communities have carved out spaces of joy since time immemorial. To this end, this concept addresses a hermeneutical injustice of its own. The implications of these literacies of joy are discussed as means of anti-oppressive pathways to educational research and teaching. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 We employ this acronym as an adjective to denote the many racially minoritized communities described therein. While others may use related acronyms (e.g., BISOC to describe students or BITOC to describe teachers belonging to these groups), we exclusively use BIPOC throughout this piece for the sake of clarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Studies
Educational Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Educational Studies aims to provide a forum for original investigations and theoretical studies in education. The journal publishes fully refereed papers which cover applied and theoretical approaches to the study of education. Papers should constitute original research, and should be methodologically sound, theoretically informed, and of relevance to an international audience. The journal is particularly interested in research that aims to inform educational practice(s) within and/or across sectors. Whilst the journal is principally concerned with the social sciences, contributions from a wider field are also encouraged. Empirically-based papers are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Conceptualisation and empirical verification of the affective role of the teacher Transgender Solidarity and Gender Out of Place The nexus between research methodology, classroom data and instructional policy: insights from enacting the Zimbabwe curriculum framework 2015–2022 reforms Why We Need a Long View of Abolition to End the School-to-Prison Pipeline A meta-analytical investigation on the relationship between emotional labour and teacher efficacy in the Chinese context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1