覆盖不确定性范围:一种计算医疗质量指标汇总统计不确定性的新方法

Q3 Medicine Norsk Epidemiologi Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5617
Kari Krizak Halle, Tormod Aarlott Digre, Ragna Elise Støre, Torunn Varmdal
{"title":"覆盖不确定性范围:一种计算医疗质量指标汇总统计不确定性的新方法","authors":"Kari Krizak Halle, Tormod Aarlott Digre, Ragna Elise Støre, Torunn Varmdal","doi":"10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data from clinical health registries, such as medical quality registries, are often used as basis for healthcarequality indicators (QI). To aid the interpretation of quality indicators and support decisions, it is importantto quantify the uncertainty around the QI summary statistics. In this paper we suggest a novel method forquantifying such uncertainty: the Coverage uncertainty range. The method is based on the size of thepopulation present in the register relative to the total relevant population and does not make any assumptionsabout the sampling strategy or the value of the summary statistic. Furthermore, using both simulated dataand real-life data from a Norwegian medical quality registry, we illustrate why using confidence intervalswhen presenting healthcare quality indicators may lead to erroneous conclusions.","PeriodicalId":35548,"journal":{"name":"Norsk Epidemiologi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coverage uncertainty range: A new method for calculating uncertainty around summary statistics in healthcare quality indicators\",\"authors\":\"Kari Krizak Halle, Tormod Aarlott Digre, Ragna Elise Støre, Torunn Varmdal\",\"doi\":\"10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data from clinical health registries, such as medical quality registries, are often used as basis for healthcarequality indicators (QI). To aid the interpretation of quality indicators and support decisions, it is importantto quantify the uncertainty around the QI summary statistics. In this paper we suggest a novel method forquantifying such uncertainty: the Coverage uncertainty range. The method is based on the size of thepopulation present in the register relative to the total relevant population and does not make any assumptionsabout the sampling strategy or the value of the summary statistic. Furthermore, using both simulated dataand real-life data from a Norwegian medical quality registry, we illustrate why using confidence intervalswhen presenting healthcare quality indicators may lead to erroneous conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Norsk Epidemiologi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Norsk Epidemiologi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5617\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Norsk Epidemiologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v31i1-2.5617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自临床健康登记处(如医疗质量登记处)的数据通常用作医疗保健质量指标(QI)的基础。为了帮助解释质量指标和支持决策,量化围绕QI汇总统计的不确定性是很重要的。本文提出了一种量化这种不确定性的新方法:覆盖不确定性范围。该方法基于登记簿中存在的总体相对于相关总体的规模,并且不对抽样策略或汇总统计值做出任何假设。此外,通过使用挪威医疗质量注册中心的模拟数据和真实数据,我们说明了为什么在呈现医疗质量指标时使用置信区间可能会导致错误的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coverage uncertainty range: A new method for calculating uncertainty around summary statistics in healthcare quality indicators
Data from clinical health registries, such as medical quality registries, are often used as basis for healthcarequality indicators (QI). To aid the interpretation of quality indicators and support decisions, it is importantto quantify the uncertainty around the QI summary statistics. In this paper we suggest a novel method forquantifying such uncertainty: the Coverage uncertainty range. The method is based on the size of thepopulation present in the register relative to the total relevant population and does not make any assumptionsabout the sampling strategy or the value of the summary statistic. Furthermore, using both simulated dataand real-life data from a Norwegian medical quality registry, we illustrate why using confidence intervalswhen presenting healthcare quality indicators may lead to erroneous conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Norsk Epidemiologi
Norsk Epidemiologi Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The impact of longitudinal surveillance of individuals with CP in Norway; a 20-year quality registry and follow-up program perspective Nasjonalt register for gastrokirurgi (NORGAST): noen tanker etter ti år External validation of SAPS II score reported to the Norwegian Intensive Care and Pandemic Registry (NIPaR) MS-registeret: meget viktig for MS-pasientene og enda viktigere fremover Et lederperspektiv – nytten av medisinske kvalitetsregistre og hvordan vi bruker disse i forbedringsarbeid og praksisendring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1