国际人工智能治理机制的形成:主要趋势和主要参与者

Dmitry P. Vasilyev
{"title":"国际人工智能治理机制的形成:主要趋势和主要参与者","authors":"Dmitry P. Vasilyev","doi":"10.24158/pep.2023.8.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, international artificial intelligence (AI) governance regimes are taking shape. In this article, the author identifies key trends and characterizes the activities of the main actors of this process at the global, regional and bilateral levels. The existence of two approaches to AI governance is proved. At the global level, “soft law” norms are being created. However, an approach has emerged in Europe that involves the development of le-gally binding rules. It is emphasized that Western countries predominantly conduct activities on AI not under the auspices of the UN, but within less inclusive organizations, making global governance of the technology inef-fective. It is also revealed that in the field of artificial intelligence regulation, states prefer to work in a multilat-eral format and there are no bilateral agreements. At the same time, despite the fact that most of the initiatives are being developed by existing organizations, there is a tendency to create new international bodies. In addi-tion, it is revealed that various regional organizations have started to work on AI regulation, and this may lead to the formation of several international regimes and the fragmentation of AI global governance.","PeriodicalId":499954,"journal":{"name":"Obŝestvo: politika, èkonomika, pravo","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formation of International Artificial Intelligence Governance Regimes: Key Trends and Main Actors\",\"authors\":\"Dmitry P. Vasilyev\",\"doi\":\"10.24158/pep.2023.8.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, international artificial intelligence (AI) governance regimes are taking shape. In this article, the author identifies key trends and characterizes the activities of the main actors of this process at the global, regional and bilateral levels. The existence of two approaches to AI governance is proved. At the global level, “soft law” norms are being created. However, an approach has emerged in Europe that involves the development of le-gally binding rules. It is emphasized that Western countries predominantly conduct activities on AI not under the auspices of the UN, but within less inclusive organizations, making global governance of the technology inef-fective. It is also revealed that in the field of artificial intelligence regulation, states prefer to work in a multilat-eral format and there are no bilateral agreements. At the same time, despite the fact that most of the initiatives are being developed by existing organizations, there is a tendency to create new international bodies. In addi-tion, it is revealed that various regional organizations have started to work on AI regulation, and this may lead to the formation of several international regimes and the fragmentation of AI global governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":499954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obŝestvo: politika, èkonomika, pravo\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obŝestvo: politika, èkonomika, pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2023.8.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obŝestvo: politika, èkonomika, pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24158/pep.2023.8.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前,国际人工智能治理机制正在形成。在本文中,作者指出了主要趋势,并描述了这一进程的主要行动者在全球、区域和双边各级的活动特点。证明了两种人工智能治理方法的存在。在全球层面,“软法律”规范正在形成。然而,欧洲已经出现了一种涉及制定具有法律约束力的规则的方法。它强调,西方国家主要在人工智能方面开展活动,而不是在联合国的主持下,而是在包容性较低的组织内,使得该技术的全球治理无效。报告还显示,在人工智能监管领域,各国倾向于以多边形式开展工作,没有双边协议。与此同时,尽管大多数倡议都是由现有组织拟订的,但有一种建立新的国际机构的趋势。此外,据透露,各区域组织已开始就人工智能监管开展工作,这可能导致几个国际制度的形成,并导致人工智能全球治理的碎片化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formation of International Artificial Intelligence Governance Regimes: Key Trends and Main Actors
Currently, international artificial intelligence (AI) governance regimes are taking shape. In this article, the author identifies key trends and characterizes the activities of the main actors of this process at the global, regional and bilateral levels. The existence of two approaches to AI governance is proved. At the global level, “soft law” norms are being created. However, an approach has emerged in Europe that involves the development of le-gally binding rules. It is emphasized that Western countries predominantly conduct activities on AI not under the auspices of the UN, but within less inclusive organizations, making global governance of the technology inef-fective. It is also revealed that in the field of artificial intelligence regulation, states prefer to work in a multilat-eral format and there are no bilateral agreements. At the same time, despite the fact that most of the initiatives are being developed by existing organizations, there is a tendency to create new international bodies. In addi-tion, it is revealed that various regional organizations have started to work on AI regulation, and this may lead to the formation of several international regimes and the fragmentation of AI global governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of Approaches to the Creation of Flexible Small-Batch Microelectronic Production in Russia Риски использования цифровых финансовых активов промышленными предприятиями: эмпирический анализ Resource Centers as a Tool of State Support for Socially Oriented Non-Profit Organizations (On the Example of the City of Moscow) Prospects for the Development of the Global Wine Market Interaction of Government and Society in the Formation of the State Scientific and Technical Policy of the Russian Federation in Modern Conditions: System-Dynamic Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1