实施全校心理健康方案的促进因素和障碍

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pastoral Care in Education Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1080/02643944.2023.2214903
Alice Wignall, Cathy Atkinson, Philippa Grace
{"title":"实施全校心理健康方案的促进因素和障碍","authors":"Alice Wignall, Cathy Atkinson, Philippa Grace","doi":"10.1080/02643944.2023.2214903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTTo develop positive learning environments, it is important that supporting mental health and wellbeing is a priority. Whole-school programmes are considered an effective way of developing provision in schools; however, poor implementation can limit the impact of such programmes, and there is a lack of clarity about the key factors affecting the implementation of whole-school approaches. This small-scale study explored the implementation of a whole-school mental health and wellbeing programme, called Emotionally Friendly Settings (EFS). It aimed to consider the factors that facilitate and also act as a barrier to the effective implementation of whole-school wellbeing programmes. Individual semi-structured interviews were carried out with one member of staff in five settings: three primary schools, one secondary school, and one specialist setting. The sample included schools which reported the programme to have low impact, medium impact and high impact. Thematic analysis identified themes and sub-themes. Authentic versus tokenistic implementation was highlighted as a key factor influencing the impact of EFS. Linked to this were leadership; attitude to the programme; engagement; support; and programme characteristics. Findings are discussed in relation to existing implementation research, and implications for practice and areas for further research are highlighted together with the limitations of this study.KEYWORDS: whole-school programmemental healthwellbeingimplementation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Geolocation informationKeywords have been selected which are relevant to the article and to searches undertaken within this study. Author ORCID identifiers have been included where appropriate.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the This project was funded through England’s Department for Education (DfE) National College for Teaching and Learning (NCTL) ITEP award 2018.","PeriodicalId":45422,"journal":{"name":"Pastoral Care in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators and barriers to implementing a whole-school mental health programme\",\"authors\":\"Alice Wignall, Cathy Atkinson, Philippa Grace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02643944.2023.2214903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTTo develop positive learning environments, it is important that supporting mental health and wellbeing is a priority. Whole-school programmes are considered an effective way of developing provision in schools; however, poor implementation can limit the impact of such programmes, and there is a lack of clarity about the key factors affecting the implementation of whole-school approaches. This small-scale study explored the implementation of a whole-school mental health and wellbeing programme, called Emotionally Friendly Settings (EFS). It aimed to consider the factors that facilitate and also act as a barrier to the effective implementation of whole-school wellbeing programmes. Individual semi-structured interviews were carried out with one member of staff in five settings: three primary schools, one secondary school, and one specialist setting. The sample included schools which reported the programme to have low impact, medium impact and high impact. Thematic analysis identified themes and sub-themes. Authentic versus tokenistic implementation was highlighted as a key factor influencing the impact of EFS. Linked to this were leadership; attitude to the programme; engagement; support; and programme characteristics. Findings are discussed in relation to existing implementation research, and implications for practice and areas for further research are highlighted together with the limitations of this study.KEYWORDS: whole-school programmemental healthwellbeingimplementation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Geolocation informationKeywords have been selected which are relevant to the article and to searches undertaken within this study. Author ORCID identifiers have been included where appropriate.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the This project was funded through England’s Department for Education (DfE) National College for Teaching and Learning (NCTL) ITEP award 2018.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pastoral Care in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pastoral Care in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2023.2214903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastoral Care in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2023.2214903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要为了创造积极的学习环境,支持心理健康和幸福是重要的优先事项。整个学校计划被认为是发展学校供应的有效方法;然而,执行不力可能会限制此类计划的影响,而且影响全校方法实施的关键因素缺乏明确性。这项小规模研究探索了一项名为“情感友好环境”(EFS)的全校心理健康和福利计划的实施。它旨在考虑促进和阻碍有效实施全校福利计划的因素。在五个环境中与一名工作人员进行了个别半结构化访谈:三所小学,一所中学和一所专科学校。样本包括报告该项目具有低影响、中等影响和高影响的学校。专题分析确定了主题和分主题。可信与代币化的实现被强调为影响EFS效果的关键因素。与此相关的是领导力;对方案的态度;参与;支持;以及项目特点。讨论了与现有实施研究相关的研究结果,并强调了对实践的影响和进一步研究的领域,以及本研究的局限性。关键词:全校计划心理健康福利实施披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。地理位置信息已选择了与文章和本研究中进行的搜索相关的关键词。在适当的地方包含了作者ORCID标识符。该项目由英国教育部(DfE)国家教与学学院(NCTL) 2018年ITEP奖资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facilitators and barriers to implementing a whole-school mental health programme
ABSTRACTTo develop positive learning environments, it is important that supporting mental health and wellbeing is a priority. Whole-school programmes are considered an effective way of developing provision in schools; however, poor implementation can limit the impact of such programmes, and there is a lack of clarity about the key factors affecting the implementation of whole-school approaches. This small-scale study explored the implementation of a whole-school mental health and wellbeing programme, called Emotionally Friendly Settings (EFS). It aimed to consider the factors that facilitate and also act as a barrier to the effective implementation of whole-school wellbeing programmes. Individual semi-structured interviews were carried out with one member of staff in five settings: three primary schools, one secondary school, and one specialist setting. The sample included schools which reported the programme to have low impact, medium impact and high impact. Thematic analysis identified themes and sub-themes. Authentic versus tokenistic implementation was highlighted as a key factor influencing the impact of EFS. Linked to this were leadership; attitude to the programme; engagement; support; and programme characteristics. Findings are discussed in relation to existing implementation research, and implications for practice and areas for further research are highlighted together with the limitations of this study.KEYWORDS: whole-school programmemental healthwellbeingimplementation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Geolocation informationKeywords have been selected which are relevant to the article and to searches undertaken within this study. Author ORCID identifiers have been included where appropriate.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the This project was funded through England’s Department for Education (DfE) National College for Teaching and Learning (NCTL) ITEP award 2018.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pastoral Care in Education
Pastoral Care in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a novel primary to secondary school transition personal and social education programme Exploring the relationship between the Emotional Literacy Support Assistant (ELSA) intervention and whole-school approaches to wellbeing – a case study High schoolers and dating issues: examining the effectiveness of an app-based mindfulness intervention “If we don’t adapt, we lose some parents”. Collaborations with migrant families in the context of student wellbeing Young people as co-researchers in schools: a collaborative research methodology which benefits young people and school culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1