废物管理:1878-1950年加纳南部黄金海岸公共厕所的供应和夜土的处理

IF 0.6 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Journal of Social History Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1093/jsh/shad017
Akwasi Kwarteng Amoako-Gyampah
{"title":"废物管理:1878-1950年加纳南部黄金海岸公共厕所的供应和夜土的处理","authors":"Akwasi Kwarteng Amoako-Gyampah","doi":"10.1093/jsh/shad017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although Gold Coast Africans in the pre-colonial period believed that supernatural forces were the final causes of diseases, they were also clearly aware of the health implications of indiscriminate defecation and other environmental pollutants. Two types of latrines existed in the Gold Coast to displace excrement beyond the healthful space of the community. One existed inside the house, which European writers referred to as privy huts. The second type was communal latrines located on the outskirts of the town boundary. Irrespective of the true conditions, European adventurers and later colonial officials viewed the Gold Coast through the prism of the racial politics of the “civilizing mission.” They conceived toileting techniques and practices as well as the management of excrement among Africans as “primitive,” unhygienic, and therefore, anathema to “civilization.” This article examines the provision of latrines and the management and disposal of human excrement in the southern Gold Coast during the colonial period. It demonstrates that despite European claims to superior toileting techniques, latrines provided by the colonial administration before the twentieth century were mostly ad hoc, inadequate, very basic, and inefficient. Similarly, colonial technologies for disposing excrement proved inefficient. Thus, the management of human waste in the Gold Coast posed technocratic barriers to public health and highlighted the limits of colonial measures and technologies.","PeriodicalId":47169,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social History","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Waste: The Provisioning of Public Latrines and the Disposal of Night Soil in Southern Gold Coast (Ghana), c. 1878–1950\",\"authors\":\"Akwasi Kwarteng Amoako-Gyampah\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsh/shad017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although Gold Coast Africans in the pre-colonial period believed that supernatural forces were the final causes of diseases, they were also clearly aware of the health implications of indiscriminate defecation and other environmental pollutants. Two types of latrines existed in the Gold Coast to displace excrement beyond the healthful space of the community. One existed inside the house, which European writers referred to as privy huts. The second type was communal latrines located on the outskirts of the town boundary. Irrespective of the true conditions, European adventurers and later colonial officials viewed the Gold Coast through the prism of the racial politics of the “civilizing mission.” They conceived toileting techniques and practices as well as the management of excrement among Africans as “primitive,” unhygienic, and therefore, anathema to “civilization.” This article examines the provision of latrines and the management and disposal of human excrement in the southern Gold Coast during the colonial period. It demonstrates that despite European claims to superior toileting techniques, latrines provided by the colonial administration before the twentieth century were mostly ad hoc, inadequate, very basic, and inefficient. Similarly, colonial technologies for disposing excrement proved inefficient. Thus, the management of human waste in the Gold Coast posed technocratic barriers to public health and highlighted the limits of colonial measures and technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social History\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shad017\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shad017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然前殖民时期的黄金海岸非洲人认为超自然力量是疾病的最终原因,但他们也清楚地意识到乱排便和其他环境污染物对健康的影响。黄金海岸存在两种类型的厕所,以取代社区健康空间以外的粪便。一个存在于房子里,欧洲作家称之为私屋。第二种类型是位于城镇边界郊区的公共厕所。不管真实情况如何,欧洲冒险家和后来的殖民官员都是通过“教化使命”的种族政治棱镜来看待黄金海岸的。他们认为非洲人的如厕技术和做法以及粪便管理是“原始的”,不卫生的,因此是对“文明”的诅咒。本文考察了殖民时期南黄金海岸的厕所供应和人类排泄物的管理和处理。它表明,尽管欧洲人声称自己拥有优越的厕所技术,但在20世纪之前,殖民政府提供的厕所大多是临时的、不充分的、非常基础的、效率低下的。同样,处理粪便的殖民技术被证明效率低下。因此,黄金海岸的人类废物管理对公共卫生构成了技术障碍,并突出了殖民措施和技术的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing Waste: The Provisioning of Public Latrines and the Disposal of Night Soil in Southern Gold Coast (Ghana), c. 1878–1950
Although Gold Coast Africans in the pre-colonial period believed that supernatural forces were the final causes of diseases, they were also clearly aware of the health implications of indiscriminate defecation and other environmental pollutants. Two types of latrines existed in the Gold Coast to displace excrement beyond the healthful space of the community. One existed inside the house, which European writers referred to as privy huts. The second type was communal latrines located on the outskirts of the town boundary. Irrespective of the true conditions, European adventurers and later colonial officials viewed the Gold Coast through the prism of the racial politics of the “civilizing mission.” They conceived toileting techniques and practices as well as the management of excrement among Africans as “primitive,” unhygienic, and therefore, anathema to “civilization.” This article examines the provision of latrines and the management and disposal of human excrement in the southern Gold Coast during the colonial period. It demonstrates that despite European claims to superior toileting techniques, latrines provided by the colonial administration before the twentieth century were mostly ad hoc, inadequate, very basic, and inefficient. Similarly, colonial technologies for disposing excrement proved inefficient. Thus, the management of human waste in the Gold Coast posed technocratic barriers to public health and highlighted the limits of colonial measures and technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social History was founded over 30 years ago, and has served as one of the leading outlets for work in this growing research field since its inception. The Journal publishes articles in social history from all areas and periods, and has played an important role in integrating work in Latin American, African, Asian and Russian history with sociohistorical analysis in Western Europe and the United States.
期刊最新文献
“Longing and Hope and Sadness and Anger”: Disentangling the Social and the Human Meanings of Agency, Agency of Meaning: On Synthesis and Entanglement Agency, Politics, and the “Impossible Domestic”: A Response to Walter Johnson’s “On Agency” On the Agency of Environmental History Is Agency a Useful Historical Concept?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1