从教师视角看并行招生教师资格悬崖:基于委托代理理论的定性研究

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Community College Journal of Research and Practice Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1080/10668926.2023.2219650
Mark Schneider, Lisa Snodgrass
{"title":"从教师视角看并行招生教师资格悬崖:基于委托代理理论的定性研究","authors":"Mark Schneider, Lisa Snodgrass","doi":"10.1080/10668926.2023.2219650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTA credentialing standard clarification brought forth by the Higher Learning Commission could result in the elimination of approximately half of the liberal arts concurrent enrollment instructors in Indiana, Minnesota, and other locations under HLC accreditation. Concurrent enrollment instructors who were affected by this evolution in credentialing and needed to complete additional coursework to retain their eligibility to instruct concurrent enrollment courses were interviewed for this research. Using the lens of principal-agent theory, the authors share the reasoning, factors, and commonalities behind the findings as to why concurrent enrollment instructors did or did not complete the required coursework before the upcoming credentialing deadline to maintain their eligibility as a concurrent enrollment instructor. Implications for the field and recommendations for policy changes further research are offered.PLAN LANGUAGE SUMMARYOne of the foundational blocks of concurrent enrollment (CE) programming are the high school teachers who are simultaneously college instructors, also known as CE instructors, in the classroom. However, a clarification and update to CE liberal arts credentialing standards set to come into effect in 2025, which requires many liberal arts CEinstructors to take additional graduate level coursework in their subject area, has the potential to disrupt CE programming in high schools. The loss of CE instructors and a reduction of CE programming would negatively impact students and instructors, and, even more broadly, negatively impact communities and states. We found that instructors who were not close to retirement were more likely to complete the additional coursework and maintain their CE credentials if their school administration, or a school administration who would hire them as a future CE instructor, was willing to increase CE instructor salaries compared to their teacher base pay. Increases in pay were viewed by instructors as the main avenue a school administration could recognize the additional work that goes into becoming a CE instructor by a high school teacher. Those who did not complete the additional coursework most often cited a lack of encouragement by their school district and not seeing the possibility of a return on their investment of time and energy to complete additional graduate coursework. With these findings and school administrators, higher education policymakers, and state policymakers in mind, financial incentives and policies school districts and state agencies could implement and offer to CE instructors to increase the supply of CE instructors are then discussed. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":51558,"journal":{"name":"Community College Journal of Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Concurrent Enrollment Instructor Credentialing Cliff from the Instructors’ Perspective: A Qualitative Study Utilizing Principal-Agent Theory\",\"authors\":\"Mark Schneider, Lisa Snodgrass\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10668926.2023.2219650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTA credentialing standard clarification brought forth by the Higher Learning Commission could result in the elimination of approximately half of the liberal arts concurrent enrollment instructors in Indiana, Minnesota, and other locations under HLC accreditation. Concurrent enrollment instructors who were affected by this evolution in credentialing and needed to complete additional coursework to retain their eligibility to instruct concurrent enrollment courses were interviewed for this research. Using the lens of principal-agent theory, the authors share the reasoning, factors, and commonalities behind the findings as to why concurrent enrollment instructors did or did not complete the required coursework before the upcoming credentialing deadline to maintain their eligibility as a concurrent enrollment instructor. Implications for the field and recommendations for policy changes further research are offered.PLAN LANGUAGE SUMMARYOne of the foundational blocks of concurrent enrollment (CE) programming are the high school teachers who are simultaneously college instructors, also known as CE instructors, in the classroom. However, a clarification and update to CE liberal arts credentialing standards set to come into effect in 2025, which requires many liberal arts CEinstructors to take additional graduate level coursework in their subject area, has the potential to disrupt CE programming in high schools. The loss of CE instructors and a reduction of CE programming would negatively impact students and instructors, and, even more broadly, negatively impact communities and states. We found that instructors who were not close to retirement were more likely to complete the additional coursework and maintain their CE credentials if their school administration, or a school administration who would hire them as a future CE instructor, was willing to increase CE instructor salaries compared to their teacher base pay. Increases in pay were viewed by instructors as the main avenue a school administration could recognize the additional work that goes into becoming a CE instructor by a high school teacher. Those who did not complete the additional coursework most often cited a lack of encouragement by their school district and not seeing the possibility of a return on their investment of time and energy to complete additional graduate coursework. With these findings and school administrators, higher education policymakers, and state policymakers in mind, financial incentives and policies school districts and state agencies could implement and offer to CE instructors to increase the supply of CE instructors are then discussed. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).\",\"PeriodicalId\":51558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community College Journal of Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community College Journal of Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2023.2219650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community College Journal of Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2023.2219650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育委员会提出的acta认证标准澄清可能导致印第安纳州、明尼苏达州和其他HLC认证地区大约一半的文科并行招生教师被淘汰。在这项研究中,我们采访了受这种资格演变影响的同时招生教师,他们需要完成额外的课程来保持他们指导同时招生课程的资格。使用委托-代理理论的镜头,作者分享了研究结果背后的推理、因素和共性,为什么并行招生教师在即将到来的资格认证截止日期之前完成或没有完成要求的课程,以保持其作为并行招生教师的资格。对该领域的影响以及对进一步研究的政策变化提出建议。并行招生(CE)编程的一个基本模块是高中教师,他们同时也是大学教师,也被称为CE教师。然而,将于2025年生效的对CE文科认证标准的澄清和更新,要求许多文科教师在其学科领域学习额外的研究生水平课程,这有可能破坏高中的CE课程。教育教师的流失和教育项目的减少将对学生和教师产生负面影响,甚至更广泛地对社区和州产生负面影响。我们发现,如果他们的学校管理部门或将聘请他们作为未来CE讲师的学校管理部门愿意增加CE讲师的工资,那么那些尚未接近退休的教师更有可能完成额外的课程并保持他们的CE证书。教师认为,工资的增加是学校管理部门认识到高中教师成为CE教师所做的额外工作的主要途径。那些没有完成额外课程的学生最常提到的原因是他们所在的学区缺乏鼓励,而且他们在完成额外研究生课程上投入的时间和精力没有得到回报的可能性。考虑到这些发现以及学校管理者、高等教育政策制定者和州政策制定者,我们讨论了学区和州机构可以实施和提供给教育教育教师的财政激励和政策,以增加教育教育教师的供应。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Concurrent Enrollment Instructor Credentialing Cliff from the Instructors’ Perspective: A Qualitative Study Utilizing Principal-Agent Theory
ABSTRACTA credentialing standard clarification brought forth by the Higher Learning Commission could result in the elimination of approximately half of the liberal arts concurrent enrollment instructors in Indiana, Minnesota, and other locations under HLC accreditation. Concurrent enrollment instructors who were affected by this evolution in credentialing and needed to complete additional coursework to retain their eligibility to instruct concurrent enrollment courses were interviewed for this research. Using the lens of principal-agent theory, the authors share the reasoning, factors, and commonalities behind the findings as to why concurrent enrollment instructors did or did not complete the required coursework before the upcoming credentialing deadline to maintain their eligibility as a concurrent enrollment instructor. Implications for the field and recommendations for policy changes further research are offered.PLAN LANGUAGE SUMMARYOne of the foundational blocks of concurrent enrollment (CE) programming are the high school teachers who are simultaneously college instructors, also known as CE instructors, in the classroom. However, a clarification and update to CE liberal arts credentialing standards set to come into effect in 2025, which requires many liberal arts CEinstructors to take additional graduate level coursework in their subject area, has the potential to disrupt CE programming in high schools. The loss of CE instructors and a reduction of CE programming would negatively impact students and instructors, and, even more broadly, negatively impact communities and states. We found that instructors who were not close to retirement were more likely to complete the additional coursework and maintain their CE credentials if their school administration, or a school administration who would hire them as a future CE instructor, was willing to increase CE instructor salaries compared to their teacher base pay. Increases in pay were viewed by instructors as the main avenue a school administration could recognize the additional work that goes into becoming a CE instructor by a high school teacher. Those who did not complete the additional coursework most often cited a lack of encouragement by their school district and not seeing the possibility of a return on their investment of time and energy to complete additional graduate coursework. With these findings and school administrators, higher education policymakers, and state policymakers in mind, financial incentives and policies school districts and state agencies could implement and offer to CE instructors to increase the supply of CE instructors are then discussed. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community College Journal of Research and Practice
Community College Journal of Research and Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Why Students Participate (Or Not) in Dual Enrollment: Results from an Evaluation of North Carolina’s Career and College Promise Inclusive Teaching: Strategies for Promoting Equity in the College Classroom Resilience in Technical Education Beyond COVID-19: A Case of Instructional Change and Innovation at a Midwestern Technical College Do Transfers into the Community College Sector Graduate at the Same Rate? Evidence from Ontario, Canada Rethinking College Admissions: Research-Based Practice and Policy Rethinking College Admissions: Research-Based Practice and Policy , edited by O. Poon and M. N. Bastedo, Cambridge, MA, Harvard Education Press, 2022, iv + 322 pp., $36.00 (Paperback), ISBN 9781682537770
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1