高/中频神经肌肉电刺激方案对重症监护室患者肌肉质量的影响,一项试点研究

Christos Georgopoulos, Aikaterini Katsogianni, Eirini Patsaki, Georgios Sidiras, Ioannis Vasileiadis, Eleni Magira, Serafim Nanas, Lefteris Karatzanos
{"title":"高/中频神经肌肉电刺激方案对重症监护室患者肌肉质量的影响,一项试点研究","authors":"Christos Georgopoulos, Aikaterini Katsogianni, Eirini Patsaki, Georgios Sidiras, Ioannis Vasileiadis, Eleni Magira, Serafim Nanas, Lefteris Karatzanos","doi":"10.12681/healthresj.34252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a high-frequency (HF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) protocol could result in a smaller loss of muscle mass than a moderate-frequency (MF) protocol in ICU patients. Methods and materials: In this randomized pilot control trial, patients of the two intervention groups followed daily NMES sessions from the day of ICU admission until the tenth day. All study groups received physiotherapy in terms of usual care. Muscle layer thickness was assessed with ultrasound in the vastusintermedius (VI) and rectus femoris (RF) muscle to evaluate changes in muscle mass. Results: Totally 58 patients were allocated into three groups and 29 were finally analyzed (control: 10, MF: 12, HF: 7). Significant differences (p=0.05) between control and pooled NMES groups were observed for the right RF and VI. Significant differences in favor of HF vs MF group were observed for the left RF (3.6±15.3 vs 7.2±7.9% respectively, p=0.04). No differences were found regarding the number of sessions and presence of oedema (p>0.05), while strength of contraction during sessions tended to be somewhat higher in the HF (p=0.09). Conclusion: HF may be more effective than MF to prevent muscle mass loss in ICU patients. More studies are needed to determine the optimal NMES characteristics.","PeriodicalId":74991,"journal":{"name":"The East African health research journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-vs medium-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocols on muscle mass in Intensive Care Unit patients, a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Christos Georgopoulos, Aikaterini Katsogianni, Eirini Patsaki, Georgios Sidiras, Ioannis Vasileiadis, Eleni Magira, Serafim Nanas, Lefteris Karatzanos\",\"doi\":\"10.12681/healthresj.34252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a high-frequency (HF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) protocol could result in a smaller loss of muscle mass than a moderate-frequency (MF) protocol in ICU patients. Methods and materials: In this randomized pilot control trial, patients of the two intervention groups followed daily NMES sessions from the day of ICU admission until the tenth day. All study groups received physiotherapy in terms of usual care. Muscle layer thickness was assessed with ultrasound in the vastusintermedius (VI) and rectus femoris (RF) muscle to evaluate changes in muscle mass. Results: Totally 58 patients were allocated into three groups and 29 were finally analyzed (control: 10, MF: 12, HF: 7). Significant differences (p=0.05) between control and pooled NMES groups were observed for the right RF and VI. Significant differences in favor of HF vs MF group were observed for the left RF (3.6±15.3 vs 7.2±7.9% respectively, p=0.04). No differences were found regarding the number of sessions and presence of oedema (p>0.05), while strength of contraction during sessions tended to be somewhat higher in the HF (p=0.09). Conclusion: HF may be more effective than MF to prevent muscle mass loss in ICU patients. More studies are needed to determine the optimal NMES characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The East African health research journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The East African health research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12681/healthresj.34252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The East African health research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/healthresj.34252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是探讨高频(HF)神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)方案是否比中频(MF)方案在ICU患者中导致更小的肌肉质量损失。方法和材料:在这项随机先导对照试验中,两个干预组的患者从ICU入院之日起至第10天每天进行NMES治疗。所有研究组在常规护理方面均接受物理治疗。用超声评估股中间肌(VI)和股直肌(RF)肌肉层厚度,以评估肌肉质量的变化。结果:58例患者分为3组,最终分析29例(对照组:10例,MF组:12例,HF组:7例),右侧RF和VI在对照组与合并NMES组之间差异有统计学意义(p=0.05),左侧RF在HF组与合并NMES组之间差异有统计学意义(分别为3.6±15.3 vs 7.2±7.9%,p=0.04)。在会话次数和水肿的存在方面没有发现差异(p>0.05),而在会话期间心力衰竭的收缩强度往往略高(p=0.09)。结论:HF可能比MF更有效地预防ICU患者的肌肉质量损失。需要更多的研究来确定最佳的NMES特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-vs medium-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocols on muscle mass in Intensive Care Unit patients, a pilot study
Aim: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a high-frequency (HF) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) protocol could result in a smaller loss of muscle mass than a moderate-frequency (MF) protocol in ICU patients. Methods and materials: In this randomized pilot control trial, patients of the two intervention groups followed daily NMES sessions from the day of ICU admission until the tenth day. All study groups received physiotherapy in terms of usual care. Muscle layer thickness was assessed with ultrasound in the vastusintermedius (VI) and rectus femoris (RF) muscle to evaluate changes in muscle mass. Results: Totally 58 patients were allocated into three groups and 29 were finally analyzed (control: 10, MF: 12, HF: 7). Significant differences (p=0.05) between control and pooled NMES groups were observed for the right RF and VI. Significant differences in favor of HF vs MF group were observed for the left RF (3.6±15.3 vs 7.2±7.9% respectively, p=0.04). No differences were found regarding the number of sessions and presence of oedema (p>0.05), while strength of contraction during sessions tended to be somewhat higher in the HF (p=0.09). Conclusion: HF may be more effective than MF to prevent muscle mass loss in ICU patients. More studies are needed to determine the optimal NMES characteristics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to Lifestyle Recommendations among Adults Attending Hypertension Clinics in Selected Hospitals in Tanzania: A Cross-Sectional Study. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice on Schistosomiasis in Pujini Shehia, Pemba Island, Tanzania: A Blueprint for Planning Community-based Interventions. Community Perceptions on Health Conditions Related to Indoor Air Pollution Among Adults Living in Urban Informal Settlements in Mwanza City, Tanzania. Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Among Health Workers and General Public in Tanzania. Experiences and Challenges of Mothers in Caring for Infants with Delayed Developmental Milestones: A Case of Dodoma Region, Tanzania.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1