在接受经皮经脉介入治疗的狗身上比较人工压迫、Z 形缝合和缝合血管闭合装置技术

IF 1.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of Veterinary Cardiology Pub Date : 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jvc.2023.11.007
A. Fabella BVSc, L.E. Markovic DVM, A.E. Coleman DVM
{"title":"在接受经皮经脉介入治疗的狗身上比较人工压迫、Z 形缝合和缝合血管闭合装置技术","authors":"A. Fabella BVSc,&nbsp;L.E. Markovic DVM,&nbsp;A.E. Coleman DVM","doi":"10.1016/j.jvc.2023.11.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/objectives</h3><p><span>Manual compression has been standard of care for maintaining hemostasis after percutaneous endovascular intervention, but can be time-consuming and associated with vascular complications. Alternative closure methods include the figure-of-eight </span>suture<span><span> (Z-stitch) and vascular closure device (VCD) techniques. We hypothesized that compared to manual compression, Z-stitch and VCD would significantly reduce time-to-hemostasis after transvenous access, and the proportion of </span>dogs<span> with vascular patency would not differ significantly among treatments.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><p>Forty-six client-owned dogs undergoing percutaneous transvenous interventional procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Dogs with vessel diameter &lt;5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression or Z-stitch, while those with vessel diameter ≥5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression, Z-stitch, or VCD. Time-to-hemostasis, bleeding scores, presence of vascular patency one day and two to three months post-procedure, and complications were recorded. Data are presented as median (95% confidence interval).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all 46 dogs, the right external jugular vein was used. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the Z-stitch (2.1 [1.8–2.9] minutes) compared to VCD (8.6 [6.1–11.8] minutes; P&lt;0.001) and manual compression (10.0 [10.0–20.0] minutes; P&lt;0.001) groups. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the VCD, vs. manual compression, (P=0.027) group. Bleeding scores were significantly greater at 5 and 10 min (P&lt;0.001 and 0.013, respectively) in manual compression, compared to Z-stitch group. There was no difference in the proportion of dogs with vascular patency between groups (P=0.59).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Z-stitch and VCD are effective venous hemostasis methods after percutaneous transvenous intervention, with Z-stitch providing the most rapid time-to-hemostasis. Both Z-stitch and VCD techniques have low complication rates and effectively maintain vascular patency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Cardiology","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 124-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of manual compression, Z-stitch, and suture-mediated vascular closure device techniques in dogs undergoing percutaneous transvenous intervention\",\"authors\":\"A. Fabella BVSc,&nbsp;L.E. Markovic DVM,&nbsp;A.E. Coleman DVM\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvc.2023.11.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction/objectives</h3><p><span>Manual compression has been standard of care for maintaining hemostasis after percutaneous endovascular intervention, but can be time-consuming and associated with vascular complications. Alternative closure methods include the figure-of-eight </span>suture<span><span> (Z-stitch) and vascular closure device (VCD) techniques. We hypothesized that compared to manual compression, Z-stitch and VCD would significantly reduce time-to-hemostasis after transvenous access, and the proportion of </span>dogs<span> with vascular patency would not differ significantly among treatments.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Animals</h3><p>Forty-six client-owned dogs undergoing percutaneous transvenous interventional procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Dogs with vessel diameter &lt;5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression or Z-stitch, while those with vessel diameter ≥5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression, Z-stitch, or VCD. Time-to-hemostasis, bleeding scores, presence of vascular patency one day and two to three months post-procedure, and complications were recorded. Data are presented as median (95% confidence interval).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In all 46 dogs, the right external jugular vein was used. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the Z-stitch (2.1 [1.8–2.9] minutes) compared to VCD (8.6 [6.1–11.8] minutes; P&lt;0.001) and manual compression (10.0 [10.0–20.0] minutes; P&lt;0.001) groups. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the VCD, vs. manual compression, (P=0.027) group. Bleeding scores were significantly greater at 5 and 10 min (P&lt;0.001 and 0.013, respectively) in manual compression, compared to Z-stitch group. There was no difference in the proportion of dogs with vascular patency between groups (P=0.59).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Z-stitch and VCD are effective venous hemostasis methods after percutaneous transvenous intervention, with Z-stitch providing the most rapid time-to-hemostasis. Both Z-stitch and VCD techniques have low complication rates and effectively maintain vascular patency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 124-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1760273423000899\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1760273423000899","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言/目的手动压迫一直是经皮血管内介入术后维持止血的标准护理方法,但这种方法耗时较长,而且容易引起血管并发症。其他闭合方法包括八字形缝合(Z-stitch)和血管闭合装置(VCD)技术。我们假设,与人工压迫相比,Z-缝合和 VCD 能显著缩短经静脉通路后的止血时间,而且不同治疗方法下血管通畅的狗的比例不会有显著差异。材料和方法血管直径为 <5 mm 的狗随机接受人工压迫或 Z-缝合,而血管直径≥5 mm 的狗随机接受人工压迫、Z-缝合或 VCD。记录了止血时间、出血评分、术后一天和两到三个月的血管通畅情况以及并发症。数据以中位数(95% 置信区间)表示。与 VCD(8.6 [6.1-11.8] 分钟;P<0.001)和人工压迫(10.0 [10.0-20.0] 分钟;P<0.001)组相比,Z 缝合(2.1 [1.8-2.9] 分钟)组的止血时间明显更短。VCD 组止血时间明显短于人工按压组(P=0.027)。与 Z 形缝合组相比,人工按压组在 5 分钟和 10 分钟时的出血评分明显更高(分别为 P<0.001 和 0.013)。结论Z-缝合和 VCD 是经皮经静脉介入治疗后有效的静脉止血方法,其中 Z-缝合止血时间最短。Z-缝合和 VCD 技术的并发症发生率都很低,并能有效保持血管通畅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of manual compression, Z-stitch, and suture-mediated vascular closure device techniques in dogs undergoing percutaneous transvenous intervention

Introduction/objectives

Manual compression has been standard of care for maintaining hemostasis after percutaneous endovascular intervention, but can be time-consuming and associated with vascular complications. Alternative closure methods include the figure-of-eight suture (Z-stitch) and vascular closure device (VCD) techniques. We hypothesized that compared to manual compression, Z-stitch and VCD would significantly reduce time-to-hemostasis after transvenous access, and the proportion of dogs with vascular patency would not differ significantly among treatments.

Animals

Forty-six client-owned dogs undergoing percutaneous transvenous interventional procedures.

Materials and methods

Dogs with vessel diameter <5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression or Z-stitch, while those with vessel diameter ≥5 mm were randomized to undergo manual compression, Z-stitch, or VCD. Time-to-hemostasis, bleeding scores, presence of vascular patency one day and two to three months post-procedure, and complications were recorded. Data are presented as median (95% confidence interval).

Results

In all 46 dogs, the right external jugular vein was used. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the Z-stitch (2.1 [1.8–2.9] minutes) compared to VCD (8.6 [6.1–11.8] minutes; P<0.001) and manual compression (10.0 [10.0–20.0] minutes; P<0.001) groups. Time-to-hemostasis was significantly shorter in the VCD, vs. manual compression, (P=0.027) group. Bleeding scores were significantly greater at 5 and 10 min (P<0.001 and 0.013, respectively) in manual compression, compared to Z-stitch group. There was no difference in the proportion of dogs with vascular patency between groups (P=0.59).

Conclusions

Z-stitch and VCD are effective venous hemostasis methods after percutaneous transvenous intervention, with Z-stitch providing the most rapid time-to-hemostasis. Both Z-stitch and VCD techniques have low complication rates and effectively maintain vascular patency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Cardiology
Journal of Veterinary Cardiology VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
154 days
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Cardiology is to publish peer-reviewed reports of the highest quality that promote greater understanding of cardiovascular disease, and enhance the health and well being of animals and humans. The Journal of Veterinary Cardiology publishes original contributions involving research and clinical practice that include prospective and retrospective studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, observational studies, and advances in applied and basic research. The Journal invites submission of original manuscripts. Specific content areas of interest include heart failure, arrhythmias, congenital heart disease, cardiovascular medicine, surgery, hypertension, health outcomes research, diagnostic imaging, interventional techniques, genetics, molecular cardiology, and cardiovascular pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Echocardiographic estimates of stroke volume in healthy dogs: comparability, reference intervals, and reproducibility Efficacy and safety of different antiarrhythmic protocols used for rate control in dogs with secondary atrial fibrillation Diagnosis and hybrid interventional and surgical removal of ectopic heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis) in a dog Transjugular patent ductus arteriosus occlusion in a cat using the Vet-PDA Occluder™ device Agreement of echocardiographic and catheterization-based methods of transpulmonary pressure gradient measurement in dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1