环塑环是否为婴儿男性包皮环切术提供了标准塑料铃环的安全替代品?

Muhammad Moazzam, Aibak Khwaja
{"title":"环塑环是否为婴儿男性包皮环切术提供了标准塑料铃环的安全替代品?","authors":"Muhammad Moazzam, Aibak Khwaja","doi":"10.2174/011874303x257072231002120604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study evaluated the early postoperative complications in Circumplast ® and Plastibell ® techniques for infant male circumcision in two community clinics. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of infant male circumcision (n=649) over 1 year (Jan 2021 to Feb 2022) performed under local anaesthesia by a single urologist. The technique was non-randomly selected. Data were collected retrospectively, and early postoperative complications were compared between Circumplast ® and Plastibell ® circumcisions. Both parents consented to the procedure. The 24-telephone support and follow-up were provided if required. Results: All records of infants were reviewed with Circumplast ® circumcision (CC) n=302 and Plastibell ® circumcision (PC) n=347 during this period. The mean age was 52.33 +/- 44.16 days in CC and 38.64 ± SD 30.39 days in PC. Three infants were excluded. There was no major complication and minor complications were lower in CC (0.99% n=3/302) versus PC (2.9% n=10/347). Delayed ring separation happened in PC (2.3% n=8/347), which was separated by a bone cutter in the clinic and no ring impaction occurred in CC. One infant in CC had bleeding after 24 hours, which was managed by removal of the ring and revision of circumcision. Two infants required separation of coronal adhesions in CC and two required revisions of circumcision in PC. Discussion: This is the first study to report the results of early experience involving the use of Circumplast ® ring to perform pediatric circumcision. Our findings reflect the use of this device as a safe alternative to Plastibell ® . A randomised controlled trial (RCT) would be required to document the relative superiority of either device. The reduced number of ring impactions among CC may be attributed to its unique design. Conclusion: Infant male circumcision by the Circumplast ® device has a lower risk of early postoperative minor complications especially migration/impaction and may offer a safe alternative.","PeriodicalId":38952,"journal":{"name":"Open Urology and Nephrology Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Circumplast Ring Offer Safe Alternative to Standard Plastibell Ring for Infant Male Circumcision?\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Moazzam, Aibak Khwaja\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/011874303x257072231002120604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study evaluated the early postoperative complications in Circumplast ® and Plastibell ® techniques for infant male circumcision in two community clinics. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of infant male circumcision (n=649) over 1 year (Jan 2021 to Feb 2022) performed under local anaesthesia by a single urologist. The technique was non-randomly selected. Data were collected retrospectively, and early postoperative complications were compared between Circumplast ® and Plastibell ® circumcisions. Both parents consented to the procedure. The 24-telephone support and follow-up were provided if required. Results: All records of infants were reviewed with Circumplast ® circumcision (CC) n=302 and Plastibell ® circumcision (PC) n=347 during this period. The mean age was 52.33 +/- 44.16 days in CC and 38.64 ± SD 30.39 days in PC. Three infants were excluded. There was no major complication and minor complications were lower in CC (0.99% n=3/302) versus PC (2.9% n=10/347). Delayed ring separation happened in PC (2.3% n=8/347), which was separated by a bone cutter in the clinic and no ring impaction occurred in CC. One infant in CC had bleeding after 24 hours, which was managed by removal of the ring and revision of circumcision. Two infants required separation of coronal adhesions in CC and two required revisions of circumcision in PC. Discussion: This is the first study to report the results of early experience involving the use of Circumplast ® ring to perform pediatric circumcision. Our findings reflect the use of this device as a safe alternative to Plastibell ® . A randomised controlled trial (RCT) would be required to document the relative superiority of either device. The reduced number of ring impactions among CC may be attributed to its unique design. Conclusion: Infant male circumcision by the Circumplast ® device has a lower risk of early postoperative minor complications especially migration/impaction and may offer a safe alternative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Urology and Nephrology Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Urology and Nephrology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/011874303x257072231002120604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Urology and Nephrology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011874303x257072231002120604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估两家社区诊所使用Circumplast®和Plastibell®技术进行男婴包皮环切术后早期并发症。材料和方法:我们回顾性回顾了由一名泌尿科医生在局部麻醉下进行的1年内(2021年1月至2022年2月)婴儿男性包皮环切术(n=649)的结果。该技术是非随机选择的。回顾性收集资料,比较Circumplast®和Plastibell®环切术的早期术后并发症。父母双方都同意这个手术。如有需要,提供24个电话支助和后续行动。结果:回顾了这段时间内使用Circumplast®包皮环切术(CC) 302例和Plastibell®包皮环切术(PC) 347例婴儿的所有记录。CC的平均年龄为52.33±44.16天,PC的平均年龄为38.64±30.39天。3名婴儿被排除在外。CC组无重大并发症,轻微并发症发生率(0.99% n=3/302)低于PC组(2.9% n=10/347)。PC发生迟发性环分离(2.3% n=8/347),临床用骨切割器分离,CC未发生环嵌塞。1例CC患儿24小时后出血,经取环和包皮环切术修复处理。两个婴儿需要分离冠状粘连在CC和两个需要修改包皮环切在PC。讨论:这是第一个报道使用环塑环环进行小儿包皮环切术的早期经验的研究。我们的研究结果反映了该设备作为Plastibell®的安全替代品的使用。需要随机对照试验(RCT)来证明两种设备的相对优势。CC之间的环碰撞数量减少可能归因于其独特的设计。结论:婴儿男性包皮环切术使用Circumplast®设备具有较低的术后早期轻微并发症风险,特别是迁移/嵌塞,可能是一种安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Circumplast Ring Offer Safe Alternative to Standard Plastibell Ring for Infant Male Circumcision?
Purpose: This study evaluated the early postoperative complications in Circumplast ® and Plastibell ® techniques for infant male circumcision in two community clinics. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the outcome of infant male circumcision (n=649) over 1 year (Jan 2021 to Feb 2022) performed under local anaesthesia by a single urologist. The technique was non-randomly selected. Data were collected retrospectively, and early postoperative complications were compared between Circumplast ® and Plastibell ® circumcisions. Both parents consented to the procedure. The 24-telephone support and follow-up were provided if required. Results: All records of infants were reviewed with Circumplast ® circumcision (CC) n=302 and Plastibell ® circumcision (PC) n=347 during this period. The mean age was 52.33 +/- 44.16 days in CC and 38.64 ± SD 30.39 days in PC. Three infants were excluded. There was no major complication and minor complications were lower in CC (0.99% n=3/302) versus PC (2.9% n=10/347). Delayed ring separation happened in PC (2.3% n=8/347), which was separated by a bone cutter in the clinic and no ring impaction occurred in CC. One infant in CC had bleeding after 24 hours, which was managed by removal of the ring and revision of circumcision. Two infants required separation of coronal adhesions in CC and two required revisions of circumcision in PC. Discussion: This is the first study to report the results of early experience involving the use of Circumplast ® ring to perform pediatric circumcision. Our findings reflect the use of this device as a safe alternative to Plastibell ® . A randomised controlled trial (RCT) would be required to document the relative superiority of either device. The reduced number of ring impactions among CC may be attributed to its unique design. Conclusion: Infant male circumcision by the Circumplast ® device has a lower risk of early postoperative minor complications especially migration/impaction and may offer a safe alternative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Does Circumplast Ring Offer Safe Alternative to Standard Plastibell Ring for Infant Male Circumcision? Survival and Analysis of Predictors of Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis in a Rural Hospital in Puducherry, India: A Retrospective Cohort Study Parameters of Chronic Kidney Disease to Identify Outpatients at Increased Risk for COVID-19 Mortality: A Cohort Study of UK Biobank Participants Accuracy of Bioimpedance Modalities for Fluid Assessment in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Observational Study Treatment of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Children Post-Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center’s Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1